All Recent Posts on GreenBiz.com
> Read More News
Sponsored Links

PET Project: Coke's Big Recycling Plant

  • Email
  • Print
  • RSS
  • Read Comments
Roughly 75 percent of plastic soda and water bottles end up in landfills, by some estimates. What a waste. We could argue about whether to blame lazy consumers, governments that fail to promote recycling, or the beverage industry. We could debate whether bottle bills will solve the problem. (They won't, by themselves.) We could try to persuade people to give up bottled water. (They won't.) Or we could look for market-based solutions, and see if they have the potential to scale.

That's what the The Coca-Cola Co. is doing. This week, Coke stages a grand opening for the world's largest bottle-to-bottle recycling plant in Spartanburg, S.C. (The plant's been running at less than full capacity for months.) The facility is a $60 million joint venture of Coke and the United Resource Recovery Corp. (URRC), which calls itself the world leader in transforming waste bottles into new ones. URRC has a patented process for recyling food and beverage containers made of polyethylene terephthalate, or PET.

The plant will have the capacity, when fully operational, to produce 100 million pounds of recycled PET plastic chips—enough to produce 2 billion 20-ounce bottles of Coke or Dasani or whatever.

It's a small step toward the goal of sustainable consumption—the idea the we can buy and consume stuff in a ways that don't degrade the environment or create waste. Coke has said that it ultimately wants to recycle or reuse all of its plastic bottles and cans.

I spoke earlier today with Scott Vitters, the director of sustainable packaging for Coke. Scott is passionate about the environment, albeit in a geeky way, and he's proud of the plant, which has been in the works for years.

"It's an important milestone for us," he said.

The best thing about the plant is that it is intended to make money for Coke and URRC. That means that the project can be duplicated elsewhere.

Here's how it will work, as explained by Scott: A separate recycling company, led by Coca-Cola Enteprises, the world's biggest Coke bottler (don't ask me to explain the interconnected Coke system), will recover PET from a geographic area stretching from the northeast to Florida. The used PET bottles will come from its own manufacturing system, from government recycling centers and from high-profile venues like NASCAR events, college football stadiums and the House of Representatives. As the "official recycler" at the Democratic national convention in Denver, Coca Cola Recycling even collected waste from the arena known as the Pepsi Center. "All that material went back into our bottles—gleefully," Scott says.

Another source for feedstock is a Coke-backed startup called RecycleBank, which rewards consumers who recycle more and throw away less. VC firm Kleiner Perkins is also an investor in Recycle Bank.

Getting enough feedstock into the plant is crucial to its success. "That traditionally has been a major hurdle to recycling," Scott said.

The plant will produce a plastic chip, which will be sold to yet another Coke-backed company. Most of the chips will be refashioned into plastic bottles. Coke also makes T-shirts, tote bags, fleeces and other stuff from recycled PET, mostly as a way to encourage consumers to recycle and burnish its own image.

How will the new plant make money? "Explaining the economics around recycling is always an adventure," Scott said. "You have to keep in mind different things. One is the evolution of the technology. This is about the fourth generation of recycling technology, and earlier generations were costly and environmentally ineffective. Second is the question of feedstocks, and how much they cost. Third is the cost of virgin PET. Today, that's dropping."

In other words, it's hard to know today whether the investment will pay off. "The driver for this program was environmental," Scott said. "It's not going to make anyone wildly wealthy. But we're looking to turn a profit, long term."

That's good news, for obvious reasons. If the Spartanburg plant makes money, more will be built. Right now, there's a need for a similar plant in the Midwest. Plastic bottles that are recycled near the west coast wind up in China, of all places, since it's cheap to send them over there on container ships that have delivered Chinese imports to west coast ports.

None of this is truly sustainable. Not even close. Think of the trucks, powered by gasoline, moving all of those bottles around. I didn't think to ask Scott how the plant is is powered, but chances are it's operated by electricity made by burning coal.

But Coca-Cola, to its credit, is doing its part to solve a big and needless waste problem. Now we need governments to do more to promote curbside recycling–maybe with "pay as you throw" programs, that charge wasteful people more money. And, of course, we need consumers to think twice before throwing a bottle in the trash or, worse, by the side of the road.
All Posts
 
Comments
Thu, 01/15/2009 - 01:17 - Anonymous

"Wasteful People" = cockroaches

The problem with this entire article, and with this whole movement, is the ad hominem approach.

Many kids these days are getting fed up with the presuppositions that "green" is the good religion.

How about instead of assuming the things that we are trying to convince "wasteful people" of we actually do the hard work of reporting *facts*?

The article starts with an assertion that 75% of bottles being thrown out is "a waste" and ends with a recommendation that more governments tax "wasteful people."

But where are the facts to prove that this is really the best way to use energy -- i.e. to drive around a fleet of trucks collecting used bottles?

Perhaps it isn't "a waste" and it's cheaper and safer for the environment to throw out water bottles? Is there reporting going on that shows that is better for the environment to actually re-process these things one at a time?

The simplest thing to do to win over an audience is demean those you disagree with by calling them names. No one has called anyone sub-human or "a cockroach", granted. But instead of labeling those whose behavior we dislike as "wasteful people" why not demonstrate, a least a little, that they are wasteful.

Many are not convinced that those promoting city recycling programs are actually the "wasteful people" because of the amount of energy currently required to recycle these things.

Thu, 01/15/2009 - 08:15 - Anonymous

Re: "Wasteful People" - Cockroaches

I spent the Christmas holiday in Belize on Ambergris Caye. This was my third visit in as many years. You can't even walk on the beaches anymore due to all the plastic waste that has washed ashore. Snorkeling / Diving on the barrier reef is akin to swimming in a trashcan. There was some trash the first time I went, this time it was horrible. We (people) are a blight on the planet. Our selfishness knows no bounds when it comes to the destruction we sow.

I wish I had taken pictures, but in my own selfishness, I made sure to frame my shots so that the trash wasn't visible.

Thu, 01/15/2009 - 12:02 - Anonymous

clarification?

"100 million pounds of recycled PET plastic chips".

Per year?
Per minute?
Per decade?

It's a meaningless statistic when no context is given.

Thu, 01/15/2009 - 16:51 - Anonymous

Kudo's to Coke

These are much needed efforts and people are free to downplay the importance, but instead of poking holes in the process, why not offer up some constructive ideas.

We are making an effort to get Coke to invest in solar power to run this facility, which would make the program more "green" than its current structure.

http://www.greensceneems.com

http://www.mygreenscene.com/thesolarmaidcompany/index.html

Thu, 01/15/2009 - 18:26 - Anonymous

Why can't we just do like other countries do

And recycle the same glass Coke bottles? Seems absolutely ridiculous that we put energy into melting down and recreating the same thing over and over again - WASH IT!

Fri, 01/16/2009 - 11:41 - Anonymous

Some Facts about Plastic Recycling

We should support and promote the Coke’s bottle-to-bottle

plastic recycling plant
to achieve our goal of sustainable consumption and
try our best to promote the awareness to recycle plastic bottles and cans we use
daily. I’m mentioning some

facts about recycling plastic
bottles and cans their usage and consumption.
 
A used aluminum can is recycled and back on the grocery shelf as a new can, in
as little as 60 days. That's closed loop recycling at its finest!
 
We use over 80,000,000,000 aluminum soda cans every year. Americans use
2,500,000 plastic bottles every hour! Most of them are thrown away.

The energy saved from recycling one glass bottle can run a 100-watt light bulb
for four hours. It also causes 20% less air pollution and 50% less water
pollution than when a new bottle is made from raw material.

The U.S. is the #1 trash-producing country in the world at 1,609 pounds per
person per year. This means that 5% of the world's people generate 40% of the
world's waste.

http://recyclewastematerial.com

Mon, 01/19/2009 - 15:27 - Anonymous

This is good, but we need to move toward less use of PET

This is definitely a step in the right direction, but we need to transition away from this. Bottle bills combined with re-usable bottles (like much of the world uses) would dramatically reduce waste. Giving up bottled water would also help dramatically like you mentioned, but people are giving it up, with smaller government agencies and companies leading the way. With the recession, people will be asking themselves if paying $2 for a liter of water really makes sense when water from the tap is just as good. There already are re-evaluations and I think there will be a lot more to come.

Post new comment

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
Are you human? Thanks for helping us block auto-spammers.
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.

Integrated Facilities Management Sponsor

Design Sponsor

Certification Sponsor

Innovation Sponsor

Work Environment Sponsor

Environmental Services Sponsor

Technology Sponsor

Energy Management Sponsor

See GreenerBuildings.com

Public Relations Sponsor