I spend a lot of time counseling legislators on how to get legislation -- often far less comprehensive -- enacted, so I wanted to speak to the team behind the Washington legislation to find out what was working and what was not, and how it all got legislated in the first place. Alan Heymann, public information officer for the District Department of the Environment (DDOE), set up a conference with Brendan Shane, director of the Office of Policy and Sustainability, Shane Farthing, development coordinator, and Stella Tarnay, green building coordinator, for an inside look at the state of sustainability in the nation's capital.
According to the DDOE representatives, "In general, the D.C. area is very proactive on green buildings. We have per capita largest number of green buildings. The climate for green buildings has been very good. We have gotten a lot of cooperation with industry on these measures."
That cooperation was apparently critical to passing the green building act. The District government involved the private sector in the discussions that led to the green building act as early as 2004, and most of Washington's 300 registered LEED projects are private.
The private sector and the federal government acted as "pull" factors driving the green building act. "We have the benefit in the District of the federal government demanding LEED silver or higher, and the city government is demanding LEED certified or silver for any space it rents," the DDOE team said. "So the government, both federal and city, is helping the demand."
The green building act then came along as an additional push to build green.
"A specific set of developers really went out in front of the green building movement, but through the Green Building Act, the private sector saw that it was a regional and local priority," the DDOE representatives said. "The act had an educational component, as well. Once you become educated about green buildings as a developer, you are going to see the benefits."
Green building advocates and politicians were also a part of the equation.
"In terms of the inspiration for the green building act, it came from outside of government from a group of outside advocates to the Council of the District of Columbia to move green building discussion along," said the DDOE team.
Councilman Jim Graham and others were proactive in getting the green measures passed; the Green Building Act was approved unanimously. New Mayor Adrian Fenty and City Administrator Dan Tangherlini also have been highly supportive of the green efforts.
The establishment of the DDOE was another important piece to moving forward with Washington's larger ambition to make the nation's capital the greenest city in the country.


Browse
Engage
Research










Washington DC Green Building Act
This is an insightful and informative article by Shari Shapiro that gives an excellent look at how much the Washington, DC city government has supported green buildings. Kudos to Shari for sharing Washington's success with others.
I was a member of the Washington, DC Green Building Task Force, the body that advised the city on the development of the 2006 green building legislation. The Task Force was extremely inclusive-- it included architects, engineers, developers and real estate investment specialists, housing, green schools and community advocates, and real estate attorneys. City officials acted as observers and questioned Task Force members to more fully understand diverse recommendations for the legislation.
A number of people, in addition to the legislators directly involved, deserve kudos for working tirelessly on the early versions of the Act and helping to coalesce the Task Force that advised the City Council. This list is necessarily short and incomplete (there were many outstanding contributors), but names some of the players behind the scenes:
--Mary Vogel of Plan Green (www.plangreen.net), for initiating the earliest version of Green Building Act at the request of Council Member Sharon Ambrose and Ambrose legislative assistant Esther Bushman. Esther Bushman helped to develop the earliest version of the bill, later switching to a Planning Department role with the DC government after Council Member Ambrose's retirement.
--Patty Rose of GreenHOME (www.greenhome.org) and Stella Tarnay, then a green real estate consultant and now, as noted in Shari Shapiro's column, a senior green real estate policymaker for Washington, DC, for organizing the Green Building Task Force and creating a collegial, respectful and open environment to discuss various approaches to creating the law.
--Barry Weise, legislative assistant to Council Member Jim Graham, who served as liaison between the Task Force and the Council and did a wonderful job in working with Council Member Graham to craft the bill that was adopted by the Council.
--The facilitator who expertly led the Task Force sessions.
--Tove Anderson (architect), Charles Bergen (architect), Cliff Majersik (energy and building policy expert), Anja Caldwell (green schools expert), Dan Winters (along with me, a green real estate investment expert and green building advisor), and Sean Cahill (developer) were among the many who shaped the final bill by providing excellent advice over the course of the Task Force's deliberations. The Task Force was comprised of a broad array of exceptionally committed and talented people, and this is only a sampling of the people present.
--Corey Buffo of the DC Department of the Environment and Zach Dobelbower of the DC Planning Department were among the many city officials who worked carefully and thoughtfully to absorb the Task Force's ideas and, eventually, to implement the legislation.
The Task Force completed its work over approximately 6 months, and the final bill was passed approximately 2 months thereafter. The process was characterized by inclusion, diversity, openness and mutual respect. Our group had many different opinions on how the final legislation should look, but we were united in our desire to craft a bill and gained trust in the process because it was exceptionally well-organized, facilitated and led. Everyone was heard and the final legislation offered a good compromise that satisfied the needs of many constituencies.
It was an honor to be associated with such an exceptional group and such a collegial, open and well-run process. I hope that other local and state governments emulate some of the processes that were utilized to create the DC legislation-- it was an excellent experience.
Again, thanks to Shari Shapiro for this excellent column highlighting the progress that has been made in DC on the green building front.
Leanne Tobias
Principal
Malachite LLC
www.malachitellc.com