At the time, I did not mind that I had to cycle five miles across town to work at a country house in the outskirts of Oxford that did not have heating during the winter. Not the kind of job expectation one may have when you have graduated from a so-called good university.
But five years later, I have traveled a million miles, visited more than 50 countries across five continents, negotiated contracts to build a portfolio of hundreds of carbon-abatement projects and spent an enormous amount of time learning about other cultures. What a ride!
After that fantastic experience, I thought that the next frontier for climate change is the sleeping giant of the United States and I found myself buying a one-way ticket to JFK to "try to figure out how to make it here" as the new U.S. country director for that same firm I joined five years ago (and which now has nearly 300 employees, plus heating).
In my first three months, it already feels like going back to that small cold country house in Oxford when it comes to the debates about the science of climate change or the rationale of a carbon market that I hear in N.Y., D.C. and Sacramento, but with a twist — I have to Facebook people the information about my company — something people in the developing world prefer to do over a beer, rice wine or green tea!
Four years ago, our work really picked up when the Kyoto Protocol was finally ratified by Russia, after years of back and forth. It was almost an anti-climax when they finally decided to go ahead after so much playing around. I guess Putin has always like intrigue games from his days at KGB. It was at that point when the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) -- a project-based mechanism to generate offsets regulated by the United Nations and part of the Kyoto Protocol -- found itself flooded with real demand.
Most of my work these five years has been in building a portfolio of CDM projects worldwide ranging from landfills in Latin America and biomass-to-energy projects in India to industrial energy efficiency in South Africa and China, to name a few.
During that time, my relationship with CDM has been of love and hate. There have been days that I thought it was the most fantastic mechanism of the world, that allows people to align themselves to do good, channels foreign investment to clean projects in the developing world and truly promotes sustainable development. Other days I'm convinced that the bureaucracy that the U.N. has built around the system will make it collapse under its own weight, and I put my hands up in desperation and think, "We will never go anywhere!"
But to be fair, even though the process to get an offset certified through the U.N. system can be onerous, it is also true that the mechanism does preserve environmental integrity, has helped built enormous awareness around the issue of climate change across continents, has created a pipeline of more than 4,000 projects across five continents, and has issued over 250 million of high-quality offsets in the last three years. These are accomplishments other carbon standards cannot even dream of.
Knowing the good and the bad on the CDM, it is quite shocking that policy-makers and industry groups in the U.S. totally ignore the work done and lessons learned from this incredible period of growth. It's especially ironic when funnily enough, the CDM was actually created by the Clinton Administration back in 1997 when negotiating Kyoto.
It is important that knowledge builds rapidly because there is no time to reinvent the wheel. When the Obama administration enacts a cap-and-trade bill, industry groups know very well that environmentally sound offsets are a key price control mechanism.
The U.S. could do a double-service to the world and to itself by fixing the procedural issues of the CDM and adopting an already-created, high-quality pipeline of projects seeking to make real emission reductions.
Sonia Medina is the U.S. Country Manager at EcoSecurities. This article originally appeared at the Cleantech Blog.
"Windmills booming" -- CC licensed by Flickr user myuibe.


Browse
Engage
Research










Response to Carbon creation vs Abatement
Hello Anonymous, thank you for your question. It's a good question. EcoSecurities started measuring and verifying by a third-party its carbon footprint in January 2006, following our Public Offering in December 2005. Our carbon footprint covers air travel, paper, electricity and gas usage for each one of our offices and employees. In 2006, our total emissions were 1,397 tons of CO2, this amount was verified by DNV. In 2007, our total emissions were 4,298 tons of CO2, verified by SGS. In 2008, we travelled slightly less and our total emissions were 3,152 tons of CO2, this amount is in the verification stage right now. Prior to 2006, our emissions were much smaller because our team was much smaller. To be conservative, I would estimate our 2004 and 2005 emissions as 500 tons of CO2 each year. This means, that in the last five years, the total footprint of EcoSecurities has been approximately 9,847 tons of CO2. During that time, EcoSecurities has managed to secure on the north of 400 projects worldwide and the portfolio has already delivered around 2,000,000 carbon offsets, with the potential to generate over 100 million by the end of 2012. Thus, answering your question the ratio as of today is approximately 1/200 and it may achieve to be 1/less than 10,000 by 2012. My take is that it has been worth it. Thanks again for your comment.
Sonia Medina, US Country Director EcoSecurities
carbon creation vs abatement
Question:
Have you ever compared the carbon footprint created by your extensive business travel ("I have traveled a million miles") to the carbon footprint reduction resulting from your carbon-abatement project portfolio?
Something simple like:
The footprint of my work is X% of the footprint reduction resulting from my work.
That would be an interesting ratio.
It seems like professionals in the field of managing carbon-abatement projects could/should show off that ratio.
It could be a means by which the best in the industry are recognized for their great work.