Aptera, an auto company startup, aims to change that. In just three years, the Carlsbad, Calif.-based firm has designed and built a remarkably sleek and snazzy three-wheeled, two-seat electric car.
"If a plane looked like an SUV, it wouldn’t take off," says entrepreneur Bill Gross, who is a founder and board member of Aptera. "Dolphins don't look like SUVS for a reason. Cars need to look like dolphins, not SUVs."
Here are a couple of videos showing the car, one from ABC News and another from Popular Mechanics.
The Aptera is "the most aerodynamically efficient vehicle ever," says Gross. By contrast, according to the company, an average car traveling at 55 mph uses half of its energy just to push air out of the way.
![]() |
If you pay attention to business, you’ve heard of Bill Gross. He’s a lifelong entrepreneur and the CEO of Idealab, the incubator for new businesses in Pasadena, CA. Gross has birthed spectacular successes and big flops, among them Knowledge Adventures (educational software, now part of Vivendi), Picasa (photo sharing software, acquired by Google), eToys (an online toy store that overextended itself and failed) and CitySearch (local directories.) Idealab’s GoTo.com introduced the idea of paid search to the Internet, and as such is the underpinning of the $20-billion search market now dominated by Google.
So it's fitting that Gross is currently doing lots of business with Google. Google is an investor in eSolar, a utility-scale solar thermal firm that recently announced big projects in India and in the Southwest. (You can listen to an interview that I did with Gross about the solar projects and about Aptera at GreenBiz Radio by clicking here.) Google has invested in Aptera, too, and it turns out that the company’s beginnings go back to a Google search.
As Gross tells the story, he was doing some casual research on the Stirling Engine a few years ago when he stumbled across a web page created by Steve Fambro, the founder and now chief technology officer of Aptera. Fambro, an electrical engineer, had posted a design for a vehicle that would be safe, comfortable and fuel-efficient; his initial idea was to make kits so people could build the car themselves. Gross was impressed by the idea of a super-efficient car. "Your dream is my dream," he recalls saying. "Let's get together and start a company." They joined forces with Chris Anthony, who is CEO of a company called Epic Boats (they build wake boats) and an expert in composite materials.
Using computer-assisted design, Aptera's engineers went on to design a car that weighs just 1,700 pounds with a body made from an impact-resistant material that is lighter than steel but three times as strong. The car will run 100 miles on a single charge and it's got some nifty features, including butterfly-styled doors that pop open and a solar-assisted climate control system. Its top speed is 90 mph and it goes from zero to 60 in less than 10 seconds.
"The car is very unusual looking," Gross says. "It looks like a futuristic Jetson vehicle. But we feel that that’s what it takes to actually make an impact on our energy use and transportation."
Aptera, which is based in Vista, CA., began taking orders for the cars from California residents at the end of 2007. "Very quickly, we got 4,000 pre-orders," Gross says. Buyers put down a $500 deposit. The entry-level price for the car is expected to be about $25,000.
![]() |
Last summer, Google.org announced that it had invested a total of $2.75 million Aptera and a company called ActaCell that makes lithium ion batteries for plug-in hybrids and electric cars. Google didn't say how much money went into each company but it's not a lot of dough in any event. Aptera has also raised money from Idealab, Esenjay Petroleum, The Quercus Trust and from Donald R. Beal, the retired chairman and CEO of Rockwell, about $30 million in total. But the company obviously needs a lot more to go into production. Last year, Paul Wilbur, a career automotive executive who worked for 26 years at Ford, Chrysler and a sunroof maker called ASC, was brought in as president and CEO.
Only five of the cars have been built, so far.
Gross tells me he expects to raise the cash in a few months. "Most people would not want to invest in a new car company at a time like this," he says, "but investors are quite warm to this." We’ll see.
The U.S. government is a potential source of funding for electric car and battery companies, through the Department of Energy's advanced technology loan fund. But Aptera has run into a brick wall in Washington. Apparently the government has classified the Aptera’s vehicles as motorcycles, and they aren’t eligible for loans.
I'm delighted that Gross will be at FORTUNE’s Brainstorm Green conference about business and the environment in April, to talk about both eSolar and Aptera. Here's a chart comparing Aptera’s aerodynamic drag to other vehicles. It's hard to see, I know, but the company says Aptera is more aerodynamic than a 10-speed bike and 2.86 times more aerodynamic than a Prius.

Browse
Engage
Research












Safety Continued
Very interesting commentary on composite materials. I heard the Aptera 2e has a roll cage built around it, like Formula 1 racing car. In addition, I heard the Aptera company is offering $100 to anyone who can put a dent in a 2e with a sledge hammer. I would not try to attempt that with my Jeep Liberty!
Do you know physics?
To the first Anonymous poster.
To expand upon a concept one must know what they are talking about.
What I mean is...the Aptera is manufactured using a composite intensive design (using fiberglass or carbonfiber & an epoxy resin matrix).
When designed properly composites offer many benefits that steel or aluminum can't when experiencing an impact. Such as absorbing energy instead of transmitting. The Aptera has crash zones designed into the car that exceed a typical cars design. Aptera will be conducting crash test just like any other car company so the idea that they are putting out an enclosed motorcycle and by doing so they can for go the crash testing is not their intent.
Physics tells us that a lighter object traveling at any speed will come to rest in a shorter distance than a heavier object. This means that the Aptera when impacted by any other moving object will come to rest over a shorter distance.
If you have been paying attention to what is happening in the automotive industry you would know that composites/plastics are replacing steel/aluminum on a large scale and they are doing this not only to gain efficiencies but also to improve safety for the driver.
If a vehicle is designed properly using composites as it's main materials, it can be hit by a Hummer and have a much better chance of it's driver surviving when compared to driving a steel constructed car. Look at F1 racing...do they use steel? No they don't. They us composites and the drivers survive 200 mph crashes.
I hope this gives you a better understanding of how plastics offer safer, more fuel efficient cars when compared to steel.
Aptera is Important Because It Spurs a Culture of Innovation
I admit the Aptera may not be for everyone. However, the important thing here is that it will be for some. I personally love the styling and I believe many others do too.
Yes, we should all drive less but most of us do drive quite a lot for various reasons. For those times when we do drive, the Aptera would get us from point A to point B very efficiently.
More importantly, it furthers the increasingly popular idea that we should be more efficient in our everyday lives. For we Americans, it's important to begin to realize that we are consume far too much. We have dual-income families working 50+ hours a week to live in supersized McMansions, drive supersized 6000 lb vehicles (usually with 1 occupant), and buy cheap plastic Chinese goods that end up either in a landfill or gathering dust in the increasing number of rental storage facilities. For an innovation that bucks this trend I say, "Make it a reality Aptera! I'm fully behind you!"
I must be uninformed....
The Aptera doesn't have to pass car safety tests because it's classified a motorcycle (do you see a five-mile-an-hour bumper in the picture above?).
A much more realistic solution is telecommuting. I see more office workers working from home, instead of taking their beast-cars to dibert-esque office buildings with endless rows of cubes.
I also see kids spending more time with their parents being educated at home, or perhaps walking to shared home-schooling arrangements, instead of being sent off to "Fast Times at Ridgemont High" education factories where kids are set in rows of desks so that they can pretend to be interested in their stressed out union-worker teachers.
So feel free to buy an aerodynamic, enclosed motorcycle. I'll be sitting in front of my computer screen earning dollars from home, occasionally taking a break to play with my lovely dog who watches me adoringly while I work.
Perhaps I'll see you running your three wheeled motorcycle whizzing by my house and I will marvel at your sustainable purchase.
Not bad, but...
It's a motorcycle that you can't fit into motorcycle parking (the thing is between 8-10 feet wide). But yet you can only fit 2.5 people in it. Most of the time motorcycle parking is significantly cheaper...
It's not approved for use outside of california (ie, no snow). Bummer.
Regarding abilities to survive a crash, simple physics teaches smaller/lighter vehicle loses -- SUV's lose to Buses, buses to trains, etc.
A better argument is to not get hit in the first place (motorcycler's arguement). So you reduce your risks by traveling on roads maniac drivers don't like... stick to windy sub-division roads and back-country roads... easier to stay at lower speeds without pissing other drivers off, which is both safer AND more efficient.
This comes from driving a Twike for going on two years (www.illinois.edu/goto/twike). It'll do almost 60 mph, but that doesn't mean you should. Day-in, day-out in town I rarely go over 35-40mph, typically 30mph or less. Oh yes, Twike 433 is ten years old this year, and I put about 4,000 miles on it last year, driving through two quite nasty Illinois winters ;-)
Anonymous posters should inform themselves before they post
You obviously don't know anything about this car and it's ability to survive a crash. Not only is it extremely rigid meaning it won't get crushed in an accident, but it has crumple zones and airbags including side airbags.
On top of that, saying that we should forgo lighter and more fuel efficient cars on the basis of their ability to survive accidents means that we're going to get no where in terms of weening ourselves off of foreign oil.
Changes have to start somewhere and the more people adopt smaller, more fuel efficient cars, the less chance you'll have of getting crushed by an H3 barreling through a red light.
Love your optimistic mentality, though.
Video and Interior here
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2009/03/aptera-200-mpg-car-motorcycle
Google should stick to search engines
The problem I see with the Aptera is it may cut through the air like a dolphin, but if you were hit by another car inan intersection, you'd probably come out of the accident resembling a smashed can of tuna.
Google has a nasty habit of moving beyond their strengths. For instance, they are very good at search engines, but poor at open source software (Google Apps - ugg!!).
So I don't necessarily believe that having Google back a products is a good sign - except Google has more money that brains to throw at these projects.