The question of ethics for environmental employers is a landmine issue that few people explore. In Wendy Jedlicka's recent article, she suggests that getting a job at a firm with "eco-ethics" is both difficult and desirable. Though true, this misses the more pressing questions about how ethics apply to environmental organizations.
Finding employment with any employer right now -- green or otherwise -- is difficult. However, this insight doesn't cut to the core of the question of ethics. Ethics aren't constrained to "eco" companies alone. As business schools teach the world over, ethics are universal -- both in business and in life.
What's interesting in the domain of environmental companies is that these companies rely on their "ethical business models" to attract employees more than do traditional "brown" employers. The dirty little secret is that employers -- from solar companies to sustainability consultancies and the like -- rely on jobseekers' assumption that they are ethical more than other firms because of their "eco" business models.
Having worked with employers worldwide to find and secure the top green talent, its become clear that not everyone embraces the same level of business ethics. Indeed, many businesses fail to highlight their ethics at all when we ask them what separates them from other employers.
Ethics in the environmental business are -- at present -- largely taken for granted. Yes, most employees at these firms believe they have a more ethical occupation, but the business practices themselves often don't exude ethics. Quite to the contrary, many of these businesses fail to push their ethical practices as far as their products or services.
At a time when the very value of long-standing business models has been called into question (read: investment banking, insurance, etc), it strikes me that more employers should be focusing on their ethics.
More importantly, both employees and jobseekers of green companies should be challenging these firms to "walk the walk" and create a truly triple bottom line enterprise that embraces sound ethical practices, sound environmental practices and sound business practices.
Jedlicka's article is right to raise the question about ethics, but readers should examine a company's purpose/service to determine who's ethical and who's not.
Use the interview itself as a place to ask questions about how an employer's environmental practices translate into more ethical business practices. Questions like these leave little room for maneuvering, but if a jobseeker's goal is to find an ethical employer, those that are truly ethical will jump at the chance to respond to such a question. If they don't, you may have found a case where an organization doesn't truly "walk the walk."
Continually pushing employers to keep ethics at the center of their businesses -- green or otherwise -- is the best way to ensure that your values align with your employers'.
As a managing partner at Bright Green Talent,
Nick Ellis combines his passions for the environment, social enterprise
and people into a daily commitment to green the U.S. workforce.
Image by woodsy.

Browse
Engage
Research










Defining ethics
A comment from Wendy Jedlicka, CPP
Re: " 'getting a job at a firm with "eco-ethics" is both difficult and desirable.' Though true, this misses the more pressing questions about how ethics apply to environmental organizations...Jedlicka's article is right to raise the question about ethics, but readers should examine a company's purpose/service to determine who's ethical and who's not."
I couldn't agree more. And I'm HUGE fan of third party certification (for companies) and licensing (for practitioners). Designers and their clients all have huge impacts on the health and well-being of our planet and economies, and yet there is no mechanism to certify they actually know what they're doing on the same level as there is for Doctors. Can you imagine how things would change if designers had to swear "First do no harm" -- and then were legally held accountable for their design decisions?
I would like to note though, you're calling me out for an omission that was outside of the scope of my original post. The idea was to look at how to be an eco-advocate no matter where you are on your personal eco-journey -- and -- get a job. Plus to get people to take-on getting eco-training proactively -- not how to recognize a totally eco-company or not. Plus by necessity the post uses the currently super loose language we use for "green/eco/sustainable," because the FTC's Environmental Marketing Claims Guidelines has no clear definition for these terms yet (they're working on that). Tackling that issue of definition, plus the -- is a company really eco or "ethical" -- would require several books worth of posts. I know plenty of "green" companies who aren't "ethical" (worker issues) and plenty of "ethical" companies who aren't particularly "green" (great on social issues, bad on resource issues).
Speaking of which: if anyone would like an overview of Codes of Ethics for business, the entire first chapter of our books "Packaging Sustainability," and "Sustainable Graphic Design" are devoted to this very question. (http://PackagingSustainability.info) The premise of both books is a systemic one -- you can't really have an "eco-product," if your company doesn't embrace even the generalized definition of "green/eco/sustainable" down to the roots. We start with helping people create a "green/eco/sustainable" Code of Ethics for their company addressing both social and environmental issues, by providing a variety of principle sets already in use as examples, then look at how to leverage stakeholder actions for positive change all along the creative and production process.
"Continually pushing employers to keep ethics at the center of their businesses -- green or otherwise -- is the best way to ensure that your values align with your employers'."
Exactly the point in my original article: The only way things will change is by everyone being willing to take it on themselves to keep pushing for change -- an outward, and tangible, expression of personal ethics -- and not waiting to work for an "eco" company before trying to do that. Working to bring a set of "green/eco/sustainable" ethics into any company that had no code before (other than to maximize shareholder return at any cost), is a huge step in the right direction we all benefit from.
Thanks for taking the discussion further. But I'm not sure how much of a "dirty little secret" it is that "green," is not the beat-all end-all indicator of "absolute good on every conceivable level." Though I can't argue we'd all like it to be. Like anything of man though, there will be the good, and those that just look good. What we're in the process of doing right now as a global-society is defining what is good, and what is good enough for our crisis at hand. What is REALLY good though (restorative economics) is a goal we'll be striving for, for generations. So even though that goal won't be perfectly realized in my lifetime, I'm pretty stoked to be part of the process of remaking everything we do -- and hopefully getting it right this time -- no matter how we ultimately define it.
-- Wendy Jedlicka, CPP