But in terms of wine, does "sustainable" connote a commitment to greener growing practices or is it a marketing gimmick? After a cursory perusal of winegrowers' websites, I reminded myself that a slick marketing strategy does not always equal sustainability.
What I really wanted to know was, "Are sustainable wines better than their conventional counterparts?" What better way to get to the bottom of this quandary than by approaching it as a consumer?
![]() |
My husband and I love wine, but we are by no means connoisseurs. Even after buying Wine for Dummies, I still ask questions like "How do you recognize a good wine?" and "Which matters more -- varietal or region?" Compounding my confusion, I now have green questions, too: "How do organic grapes improve a wine?" and "What makes a vineyard sustainable?" I was due for trip to California's wine country for a little re-education from the experts.
Michael Honig is one of these experts. Honig, who sits on the board of directors for The Wine Institute, is taking the Institute's Sustainable Winegrowing Program to the next level by establishing a certification to offer over 1,100 wineries and related businesses a roadmap for going green. The Sustainable Winegrowing Program helps wine producers establish eco-friendly practices from ground to glass by developing guidelines and training to promote alternative energy, ecosystem management, composting, recycling, water conservation, and corporate citizenship. Through this effort, Honig is helping elevate the prestige of the entire region in the global wine market.
Honig begins the tour of Honig Vineyard & Winery by showing us his solar array. Installed in August 2006, the winery's photovoltaic system -- "our electricity farm," is how he describes it -- consists of 819 Sanyo 200-watt modules mounted on the ground, which generates plenty of power for the winery, including cooling and bottling, he explains. Over the next thirty years, Honig's solar system will prevent the emission of over 7.5 million pounds of carbon dioxide -- the equivalent of planting more than 34 acres of carbon dioxide-absorbing trees.
How much does it cost to do this much good? "The costs we incur now are more like investments. We are applying the same money we spend on electricity to paying off the bank loan to pay for the solar panels. After ten years we will own our system, enabling us to save over $42,000 a year in electric bills," says Michael. "We used to rent our power. Now we're on our way to owning it."
The solar panels and infrastructure cost $1.2 million, but Honig only had to pay for about one third of that. As part of Schwarzenegger's Million Solar Roofs Initiative, California's Public Utilities Commission has mandated that PG&E give credits to customers who feed solar power back into the grid.
These credits, combined with state and federal tax credits, make solar affordable enough for widespread use. "We'll pay this off within 10 years, less if the cost of energy goes up," says Honig. "The warranty on these panels is 25 years, so our vineyard should enjoy 100% cost-free solar-powered energy for at least 15 years." Honig's support of clean power also extends to his choice of fuel. He uses biodiesel in all of his trucks.
Continuing the tour, he points out sustainable features like a tributary restored by native vegetation and ground cover plants such as mustard seed, clover, and barley, which act as a natural blanket covering the soil with organic matter. Honig also uses trained golden retrievers known as "sniffer dogs" to detect the mealybug, an invasive species that first appeared in Southern California a decade ago. Sniffer dogs allow the wine grower to zero in on individual vines for removal, alleviating any broad use of pesticides.
Honig stops at a box that looks like a birdhouse. "One of the ways we keep from using pesticides is by using bird boxes. Blue birds eat an enormous amount of insects. To keep the insect and rodent population in check, we use hawk perches, barn owl boxes, blue bird boxes, and bat boxes," explains Honig.
Using nature's resources to address the problem of insects sounds like a stroke of genius until I remind myself that this is not an innovation, but simply the way it was meant to be.
The difference between sustainable vintners and others is they see a tangible benefit to their bottom line by working in concert with nature. Since vineyards are farms, land is their natural capital; to preserve the health of the land is a long-term investment. "Is conservation the right thing to do? Absolutely," says Honig. "But sustainability also means 'sustaining your business.' Green practices are integral to our business because they help us run a more efficient operation and produce a better product,'" he adds. Honig's critically acclaimed wines are a testament to this fact.
Michael's strategic and pragmatic brand of sustainability has appeal for executives from other industries, too. Honig has appeared in the Wall Street Journal, and Michael now finds himself inspiring companies in other industries to consider sustainability by giving speeches around the country. "The wine industry has broad appeal. My position as the owner of a vineyard gives me a bully pulpit for talking about the benefits of sustainability," says Honig. "We believe in leading by example," he continues. "Our goal is to become one of the 'greenest' wineries in the world."
Boisset's 70 Percent Rule
Another green leader is DeLoach Vineyards, a certified organic winery known for its biodynamic farming practices and high quality yet affordable wines. The vineyard is located in nearby Sonoma County in the Russian River Valley, which wine experts consider "America's Burgundy" for producing the best Pinot Noir in the country.
![]() |
Wine Enthusiast magazine named owner Jean-Charles Boisset "Innovator of the Year" for 2008. [Also see our 2008 interview with Jean-Charles Boisset, " Turning the Wine World on its (Rabbit) Ear .] I ask General Manager Lisa Heisinger to explain why. "Well, Boisset has a long history with sustainable viticulture," explains Heisinger, "but I think the area in which we've provided leadership as a company is in sustainable packaging."
Boisset won the award for his groundbreaking applications of Tetrapak, PET, aluminum, and screw caps in wine packaging. His bold decision to put Premier Cru and Grand Cru Burgundies under screw cap makes wines "greener" by eliminating cork failure, which ruins 1 to 3 percent of wine produced. "Considering everything that goes in to making, transporting, and selling a bottle of wine, losing 3 percent can add up environmentally and financially," Heisinger explains.
The decision to put wines with centuries of prestige under screw cap was met by a split reaction. "Some people thought it was great and would reinvigorate French wines," she said. "Of course, others were flabbergasted. Disdain is not too strong a word."
![]() |
Ultimately, the screw-cap wines were very well received and sold out, so it was a bold move that paid off, though not for all wines and not in all markets. "We've installed a screw cap machine at DeLoach, and the screw caps wines are popular with our international buyers. But here in America, there is still a luxury connotation to wine. We want the romance of the cork. We want the glass bottle. Anytime you change the packaging to anything that is not glass, whether it's Tetrapak, or screw cap, or PET, or anything without a cork, you are liable to have some people in the audience who are wary."
![]() |
Americans may still be wary of screw cap wines, but those are just the tip of the iceberg in terms of green packaging. Heisinger presents Boisset's greenest innovations: wine in a plastic bottle embossed with a geometric design; wine in a lightweight aluminum bottle that chills rapidly; and a half-liter of wine in a recyclable cardboard container. These packaging alternatives are less energy-intensive than heavy glass bottles. They also require far less transportation. As Heisinger explains, "It takes 28 more trucks to deliver the same volume of bottled wine as it does wine packaged in Tetrapak."
This attentiveness to green packaging is not a marketing initiative but it's a company policy called The Boisset 70 Percent Rule. "More than 31.2 billion bottles of wine are consumed on earth each year," says owner Jean Charles Boisset. "Seventy percent of that wine retails for less than $10 per bottle. Within that 70 percent, at least 70 percent is consumed between 28 minutes and 3 hours of purchase. Seventy percent of the cost of that wine is the packaging (bottles, corks, capsules, and all other dry goods), shipping, and other related supply chain costs.
"The vast majority of the environmental impact of wine comes from the production and disposal of the packaging and from shipping the heavy merchandise around the world. We know that wine meant to be enjoyed young can be kept fresh and flavorful in a variety of packaging formats. Why then not offer this wine in lighter, more environmentally-friendly packaging that will reduce its carbon footprint and cost less to ship, yet still provide the high quality that customers demand?" Boisset asks. "By lightening the packaging and reducing its carbon footprint, the wine world can make a dramatic difference in the health of our environment … and invest in better quality wines!"
| Sustainable Wines and Vineyards* |
| (Solar-powered, organic, and/or biodynamic) Napa Valley, California Araujo Estate Wines -- http://www.araujoestatewines.com Frog's Leap -- http://www.frogsleap.com Grgich Hills Estate -- http://www.grgich.com Honig Vineyard and Winery - http://www.honigwine.com Joseph Phelps Vineyards -- http://www.jpvwines.com Miner Family Vineyards -- http://www.minerwines.com Robert Sinskey Vineyards -- http://www.robertsinskey.com Shafer -- http://www.shafervineyards.com Sonoma County, California Benziger Winergy -- http://www.benziger.com Cline Cellars -- http://www.clinecellars.com De Loach Vineyards -- http://www.deloachvineyards.com Ferrari-Carrano - http://www.ferrari-carrano.com Medlock Ames -- http://www.medlockames.com Red Truck Wines -- http://www.redtruckwine.com Ridge Vineyards -- http://www.ridge.com Mendocino County, California Parducci (1st Carbon Neutral Winery in U.S.) -- http://www.mendocinowinecompany.com Other Resources California Certified Organic Farmers -- http://www.ccof.org California Sustainable Winegrowing Alliance -- http://www.sustainablewinegrowing.org Sonoma County Winegrape Commission -- http://www.sonomawinegrape.org Wine Institute -- http://www.wineinstitute.org * Contact vineyards to find distributors of their wines to stores and restaurants in your area. |
Boisset's bold approach to greener packaging and the favorable response among consumers in the international market demonstrates the significance of leadership. Such leadership in the greener packaging arena is helping shift demand in favor of greener packaging by exposing more consumers in different markets to these alternatives.
"The wine market in America may well change because of the millennial generation," continues Heisinger. "They are used to choices and adventure. We call it the Starbucks effect. Our grandparents just ordered coffee; today we choose from 30 different menu items at the coffee shop."
As consumers develop a taste for more "playfulness" in wines -- something Boisset excels at, notably with its "French Rabbit" wine in rabbit-eared cardboard boxes -- a willingness to accept eco-friendly packaging may be next.
Old (and Green) Methods Become New Again
Sustainable winemaking isn't new to Napa, but what was once considered a trend seems poised to become an industry standard, albeit a flexible one. The term "sustainable" spans everything from agricultural practices and energy use to packaging and transportation of the finished product.
Still, sustainable is not to be confused with "organic." The term "organic" applies to grapes grown without chemicals and pesticides. The finished product cannot be labeled "organic" because wine by its very nature contains sulfites. So, when you see "made with organically grown grapes," the wine can be considered as close to organic as possible.
Winemaking is a complex undertaking, part science, part art and all business. Winemakers striving to be greener must balance a number of interests. Although demand for sustainable wine is increasing, green practices wouldn't take root in the industry if they were to compromise quality, and from my amateur perspective, there was quality aplenty in the sustainably grown wines we tasted.The more you learn about wine, the more you'll learn what you don't know. But one needn't overcomplicate something so enjoyable. When in doubt, take the advice of American wine legend Robert Mondavi, "Instead of relying totally on critics, drink what you like and like what you drink." I'll raise my glass to that.
Anna Clark is president of EarthPeople, a full-service consulting firm that helps companies of all sizes create and execute profitable green strategies to save money and bolster their brands.
















































Loved the article
Lots of anonymous critics here, some of whom actually provided some statistics that fit their own personal agenda, but 100% of whom completely missed the point of this article, as is usual for the tittering critic culture of ours.
The point of the article is simply to point out, in a fun way, some sustainability features and trends in the winemaking industry. Pretty simple, really. It was NOT to provide an in-depth discussion or study of all possible sustainability features and options in the wine business; or to profile all the wineries in the world; or to debate the relative merits of corks vs. screw caps or glass vs. plastic recycling. Any intelligent person realizes that for every agenda, there is a statistic, somewhere, that supports it. The anonymous critics (as cowardly critics always prefer to be, so as to eliminate accountability) here simply haven't conducted a study or any research of the relative merits of these issues and sustainability features as the apply to the making and transporting of wine. They don't have the facts, only assumptions and raw numbers. Of course, they have nothing at stake, either, so it's easy for them. The winemakers, however, have a great deal at stake. Frankly, I prefer to listen to the people in the world who actually do something, or have something at stake, over those who simply sit back, anonymously behind their little keyboards, and criticize them.
Nice job, Anna. Thanks for the great read and the information. Keep up the good work.
Michael K. Johnston
Biloxi, Mississippi
Corks are (Far) More Sustainable than Screw Caps
Anna, your suggestions that screw cap is more eco-friendly than natural cork is simply false and misleading.
Fact: Real cork is 100% natural, renewable, biodegradable, recyclable, forested in a ecologically, economically and socially sustainably manner, and has been shown by every study performed to have by far the lowest carbon footprint of any wine closure. Google it yourself, but EVERY study on closure sustainability agrees on this point. Here is just one example:
Natural Cork - 8 gram CO2 eq
Nomacorc synthetic closure - 16 gram CO2 eq
Screw Cap (70% recycled Aluminum) - 36 gram CO2 eq
Screw Cap (35% recycled Aluminum) - 52 gram CO2 eq
Source: Nomacorc Carbon Footprint Study, Apr 08
Fact: Screw Caps are made from a combination of aluminum and plastic (liner), i.e. on non-renewable, unsustainable materials of metal and oil dug from the earth. Like grapes from vines, cork is literally grown on trees (in protected forests that further act as major carbon sinks and provide eco-critical services.
Fact: While today's major cork suppliers use innovative technology and practices that greatly reduce if not eliminate the risk of TCA taint by cork, it's equally well documented that screw caps may cause 'reduction' in wine which can result in waste and possibly lost customers who don't like wine that smells like rotten-eggs.
Fact: While screw caps certainly DO have some advantages over cork (the two greatest being convenience for consumer and lower cost for producer), eco-friendliness and sustainability are NOT among them. Screw caps are actually the LEAST eco-friendly type of wine closure.
Anna I enjoyed your article but encourage your to PLEASE check your facts and provide your readers a more accurate and helpful accounting.
False claims regarding organic...
Nice article, but to say that wine made with organic grapes cannot be labeled "organic" is simply false. Frey Vineyards and La Roccas and others have long made wine without added sulfites and most of their wines have no detectable sulfites in them. They can, and do, label their wines "organic." So true, organic wines do exist, under current standards. Most winemakers who make wine from organic grapes would love to get rid of the requirement that sulfite levels must be below 10ppm in order for the wine to be called "organic wine," and not merely "made from organically grown grapes." But since organic food standards do not allow sulfites to be added to the product, the same standared was set to apply to wine.
So that second-to-last paragraph contains many false statements in an otherwise good article!
Renewable Technologies for Wineries other than Solar
I enjoyed your article but couldn't help but notice you never mentioned geothermal, wind, or hydrogen fuel cell as available renewable technologies for wines.
Also, while solar is a great technology, it still costs A LOT of upfront money for a company, winery or otherwise.
As a sustainability researcher with BlueMap Inc., we are seeing our clients ask us for renewable energy technologies with a payback of 3 years or less. Many companies simply cannot afford to wait 6-8 years or more for solar to pay back.
I wish you went a bit deeper into renewable technologies and included ones with a shorter payback period which would be much more feasible for the average winery.
Meaningless numbers
Anna Clarke should know better than to include meaningless statements such as "It takes 28 more trucks to deliver the same volume of bottled wine as it does wine packaged in Tetrapak". Without knowing the volume of wine transported, it is impossible to know how significant that is.
Furthermore, any savings from lightweighting can often be wiped out by greater embodied energy in the packaging itself. Tetrapaks emit about 1.8 kgCO2 per kg, PET bottles 4.1 kgCO2 per kg, whilst glass is only about 0.8 kgCO2 per kg (100% virgin) and about 0.5kgCO2 per kg (100% recycled). An holistic view needs to be taken as to the best packaging material.
nice work!
Anna,
As usual your article is well researched, well written, interesting and informative. Thanks for the time you put into this one.
Paul Diamond,
Web Editor, Vistage
http://www.vistage.com/
tetrapak & plastic vs glass bottles
It sounds as though DeLoach vineyards and Boisset have not accounted for the limited recycling potential of tetrapak and plastic bottles compared to the infinite recyclability of glass. When this is added to the equation, transport would be a much less significant element in the overall impact of wine production.
Green Wineries
I'm curious as to why you failed to mention Frey Organic Wines (Mendocino County). As I understand it, they are the first organic winery in the US.