In the interests of full disclosure, I am a member of the International Code Council's team crafting a Green Building Code.
After LEED, Green Globes, BREEM, Energy Star, NAHB Green and the prospective ASHRAE 189, why on earth do we need another green building standard? Is it simply to give people like me something to do in their spare time? (I had thought about taking up knitting.) The answer is definitely not.
According to the ICC:
The objective of this new project is to develop a Green Building Code for traditional and high-performance buildings that is consistent and coordinated with the ICC family of Codes and Standards.
As articulated above, the point of the ICC Green Building Code is to be consistent with the other I-codes which most jurisdictions have adopted (or tweaked) as the basis of their building codes. Thus, builders building green buildings must adhere to two standards at least -- the conventional I-Code based building code, and the green building standard. This has caused many issues, including the waterless urinal fiasco, in which waterless urinals were prohibited under conventional code provisions. By integrating a green building standard with the building code, these types of headaches can be minimized.
In addition, code officials and politicians are comfortable with adopting and utilizing I-Codes as the basis for building regulations. Thus, municipalities do not have to reinvent the code wheel when looking to implement green building practices.
Finally, a solid compromise green building code can advance green building as the default standard. In California, which has adopted a green building code, various interest groups, including the California Building Industry Association, have come on board with the code.
There will always be a place for aspirational green building standards. LEED, for example, should provide new and innovative and more challenging ways to reduce GHG emissions, materials usage, enhance energy efficiency, etc.
The goal of a code, however, should be to raise the floor of all buildings to a greener baseline. ICC's Green Building Code effort is a step towards making that happen. So, for me, knitting will have to wait.
Shari Shapiro, J.D., LEED AP, is an associate with Obermayer Rebmann Maxwell & Hippel LLP in Philadelphia. Shari heads the company's green building initiative. She also writes about green building and the law on her blog at http://www.greenbuildinglawblog.com, where this post originally appeared.
Images CC licensed by Flickr user OiMax.
I’M A ECO CODE WONK AND HERE TO HELP
Oh the poetry of the benevolent regulator descending down to touch the earth and bestow hallowed wisdom to all us bumpkins, guiding our thirst for knowledge of our place on earth. …after all, California did it! In case your knowledge of the green movement does not match your awareness of the real world, California’s economy is in a tailspin with $60,000,000,000 (billion) in debt and a state government is in ciaos. California is a model for nothing other then arrogant, grid locked bureaucrats and the economic disaster they cause.
“…The objective of this new project is to develop a Green Building Code for traditional and high-performance buildings that is consistent and coordinated with the ICC family of Codes and Standards….”
The only goal of codes is to protect our health, safety and welfare. There is certainly nothing wrong with coordinating codes with sustainable practices that many firms design around every day. Problems arise when the true attentions of bureaucrats remain concealed as they attempt to subvert normal business decisions of building owners, remove the notion of choice and dictate environmental activism at the expense of others.
The notion of benevolent coordination leveraged into institutionalized activism is what you’re really peddling. Certainly “sustainable standards” contained in LEED offer elements of benefit that a client can support depending on his business model. Those standards are nothing like a mandated code as you suggest.
”….The goal of a code, however, should be to raise the floor of all buildings to a greener baseline. ICC's Green Building Code effort is a step towards making that happen……”
What!? The goal of an environmentally crazed Al Gore groupie is to ignore reality and inflict naïve notions of wishful engineering on an industry that depends on the economy, judgment and innovation for its existence. The new building construction market certainly does not depend on government mandated fads. Quite the opposite, the ideas you are so proud of join with other government mandated disasters to continue the erosion of the nation’s economy for justifications that range from obscure to ridiculous. I invite you to go back to knitting – I’m sure you can find federal funding for your yarn.