The first time I heard about the conservative, red-baiting crusade against Van Jones, I thought, this is ridiculous, even funny. “Will a ‘red’ help blacks go green? White House appoints ‘radical communist’ who sees environment as racial issue,” was the headline on an influential far-right website known as World Net Daily. What is this, 1952?
I’m not laughing anymore.
There’s a lot to say about the way Van Jones was hounded out of Washington by Fox News opinator Glenn Beck and his allies. Much of it has been said in the last couple of days. Because others have done a good job digging into the back-and-forth about Jones, I don’t want go there. Nor do I want to defend everything that he has said or done. He clearly made mistakes, most notably and recently signing a so-called Truther petition in 2001, an act for which he has since apologized.
But I’ve covered Jones on a handful of occasions in the last few years, and I’ve really been impressed. So I want to add a few observations about him, about the controversy and about where this is leading:
1. The charge that Van Jones is a communist is laughable. Van was a political radical and a prison reform activist after he graduated from Yale Law School during the 1990s, but so what? Like many of us, he evolved. I first heard him speak about social justice to a conference of Business for Social Responsibility, a liberal business group, a few years ago and he wowed the audience. He then became a leading advocate for green jobs and environmental justice. He told me in a column in 2007 that the environmental movement has “to start talking the language of work, wealth and health, which is the language of everyday Americans.” he says. (”Work, wealth and health” could be a Republican slogan.) He spoke last year at FORTUNE’s Brainstorm Green conference, along with the likes of Bill Ford and Bill Clinton, and he wowed the crowd of well-to-do business people. He’s a progressive, like millions who voted for Obama. A communist? Give me a break.
2. Glenn Beck has identified his next targets. In a message to his followers on Twitter last week, Beck wrote: “Watch Dogs: FIND EVERYTHING YOU CAN ON CASS SUNSTEIN, MARK LLOYD AND CAROL BROWNER. Do not link before burning to disc.” Sunstein has been nominated to head the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Lloyd is associate general counsel and chief diversity officer of the FCC, and Browner is the White House climate change czar. I don’t know Lloyd, but Sunstein is a brilliant and iconoclastic economist who will bring fresh ideas to Washington and Browner, while hard-edged, ran EPA during the Clinton administration. Who’s going to want to serve the government in a climate as poisonous as this?
3. The mainstream media blew this story. You’d think that a drumbeat of irresponsible attacks on a charismatic black White House official would get the attention of The Times or The Washington Post, but no. I don’t think The Times had a word about this until Jones quit, by which time it was too late. Worse, the press has yet to hold Glenn Beck and his allies to account. To follow the story as it unfolded, you had to be reading David Roberts on Grist (who has tracked it for weeks) or Alternet (this story challenges Beck’s lies) or this Gawker post digging into the factsr or David Weigel’s tenacious reporting in The Washington Independent.
4. What about Rupert? Now that he owns The Wall Street Journal, Rupert Murdoch would like to be treated with respect. But Fox News doesn’t even try to live up to its standard of “fair and balanced.” While strong opinions are fine, Beck is a smear artist who, at one point, said of Jones: “This is a convicted felon, a guy who spent, I think, six months in prison after the Rodney King beating.” Uh, no–never convicted, no time in prison. In fact, Jones was arrested while serving as a volunteer legal monitor of a march protesting the Rodney King verdict and the charges were subsequently dropped. Here are the facts from someone who was there at the time. That Murdoch permits (encourages?) distortions on his network is shameful. I’d love to see the WSJ tackle Fox News, but I won’t hold my breath.
5. What about Obama? The White House didn’t exactly cover itself in glory by standing behind Jones.
GreenBiz.com Senior Writer Marc Gunther blogs at www.marcgunther.com.
Photo credit: Eclectek via Wikimedia Commons





![Ending the alphabet soup in the [insert word here] field Ending the alphabet soup in the [insert word here] field](http://www.greenbiz.com/sites/default/files/imagecache/wide_small/130516-voien1-w.jpg)








Question
Mark,
I have a question. If it was all a smear campaign from Fox News and Glenn Beck. If Fox News and Glenn Beck are only watched by the right-wing frenge. And if the conservative movement is dead.....
Why did Van Jones quit?
Jones Vs. Jones
What don't YOU people get? Van Jones is by his own definition, a communist. He is further more a racist by claiming white people are poisoning "People of color". More blame storming by White haters like Van Jones.
Why do you think Osama, I mean Obama isn't standing behind him? Are YOU people that stupid? He screwed himself, no one made him say what he said, like being a communist. This creep could never get an FBI clearance. He never even filled out an application, just Osama waving his magic wand.
It's finally catching up with Osama, and he too will be gone within a year by his own lies.
Double Standard
I love how when it's the Right calling the president of the President of The United States a racist, communist and comparing him to Hitler, that's ok and just the first amendment in action, but as soon as a Democrat dips one toe in the same waters, it's a scandal.
And as outlandish as Truthers are, they're not nearly as ridiculous and as stupid as Birthers, one of whom holds a seat in the U.S. Senate for God's sake.
Conservative America, we're sick of your overt and flagrant hypocrisy; that's why you're not in power any more. Get over it. Look in the mirror next time before you start judging and making allegations about people who quite frankly often pale in comparison to the people and/or party pointing fingers.
THUG-OCRACY.
FINALLY someone is able to expose these weird 'czars' that Obama is putting into place (usually done with little fanfare). Van Jones puts a face to all of these secretive appointees. What's great is that someone like Glenn Beck actually gives 'THE PEOPLE' a chance to understand these weird czar buddies of Obama's - for the pasts they have, and the views they hold... Obama has been trying to create a 'Thugocracy' and people who enlighten the public to the resumes of these thugs are actually being VERY patriotic!
Not a communist?
How can you say the idea that Jones is/was a communist is "laughable" when he says so in this article (which clearly was not a smear piece):
http://www.eastbayexpress.com/gyrobase/the_new_face_of_environmentalism/...
We should be cautious
The biggest problem I have in discussing environmental issues and even renewable energy issues (my work) always boils down to politics. I'm an engineer by habit, a business person by experience, husband, father, etc. Way way down the list comes politics for me. However, we have to be honest, as is often the case, political energy follows the money. "Green business" has evolved to be huge and is growing, and the political sides are fully charged. For one side to say all the issues are totally bunk defies reason. For the other side to say that science is fully resolved and there is a catastrophe at our doorstep is equally unreasonable. Scientific proof always comes with the caveat, "to the best of our knowledge...". So, the person who will be the most visible voice in the White House, regardless of title, has to be able to bridge the divide to a degree get things done. Anyone who has a relatively long history of using revolutionary language and rhetoric has an uphill battle even if they were to denounce and apologize, or whatever ideologues may want.
Many have commented about how intelligent this guy is. Perhaps. However, what would be better for progressing the topics would be someone with more accomplishements beyond a book in the green business industry and perhaps a more neutral outlook. Just one man's opinion based on lot's of chat on the topic.
Van Jones Smeared Himself
Regarding environmental community efforts, Van Jones said the following:
"The environmental justice community that said, 'Hey, wait a minute, you know, you're regulating, but you're not regulating equally.' And the white polluters and the white environmentalists are essentially steering poison into the people-of-color communities, because they don't have a racial justice frame."
Plain and simple, this is an EGREGIOUS racist comment. If one were to reverse the words "white" and "people-of-color" in that comment, all environmentalists, progressives, media, etc. would be screaming through the rafters to take this person down immediately.
This isn't progressive environmentalism, it is regressive ideology-backed drivel.
Grow up. One of our environmental colleagues was just enough off his rocker that he didn't deserve a direct seat of power within our government.
The Smearing?
Okay, so what was the smear? As a Libertarian I thoroughly enjoy this back and forth between you on the left with those on the right. Now it's the rights turn -- something you on the left have done for 8-years. What did the right say that wasn't true? Jones apologized for everything didn't he? What about this awesome vetting process in the White House? The leftist in the WH are as bad as those who lived there last administration. How can you even consider blaming the mainstream media? Go back and see when the story was covered for the first time? It was Fox and CNN who covered it pretty much since day one. The NY Times didn't touch on it till the other day. Now if you really want to clean up government how about saying a few words about Charlies Rangel from NY. There is none more crooked in Congress and there is little said in the news about him.