There's been a lot of coverage in recent days about the companies defecting from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce over disagreements with the organization's stand on climate change. At Shelton we haven't been privy to the behind-the-scenes conversations on this or all the stated (and not stated) reasons for both sides of the argument, but here's what we do know from a consumer perspective:
To the U.S. Chamber's point:
• Roughly 40 percent of the population is not on board the global warming train. In all of our quarterly studies for the past six quarters we've seen that about 25 percent of the population is definitely opposed to the idea that global warming is happening and caused by man, and another 15 percent are not sure what they believe.
• The economy is driving consumer thinking right now. Even among the greenest consumers in our Green Living Pulse study, the economy was the number one issue way ahead of the environment (60 percent of green consumers chose the economy first, while only 8 percent chose the environment). Further, about 80 percent of the population thinks it costs more money to be green. So if the Chamber's stance is that climate change legislation will cost consumers more money, it's definitely a concern consumers share.
• Our upcoming Energy Pulse study reveals that only 23 percent of the population think cap and trade regulations for CO2 emissions should be enacted for utilities and manufacturers. The Chamber's stance seems to support that thinking.
To the point of the companies who've resigned their memberships:
• 93 percent of consumers think companies only go down the green path as a marketing ploy or because they're made to do so by some regulatory body. This is frustrating to consumers. They'd like to have brands they can believe in, brands who "do the right thing." The bold move made by Nike, Apple, PNM, Exelon and PG&E will likely be seen by consumers as honest, committed and as a major proof point behind their sustainability claims. Consumers may reward this "putting our actions where our mouths are" move with loyalty (read: sales).
• The climate change legislation issue is VERY complicated and most consumers don't have their brains wrapped around it. In fact, most consumers think global warming is caused by cars and trucks, not power plants or manufacturing plants, so they don't actually understand the point behind a cap and trade system. The fact that several major brands, a couple of which are considered pretty hip, are walking away from an organization that does not support legislation for climate change could sway consumers to think this way as well, regardless of whether consumers really ever understand the issue.
The moral of the story: this is a very divisive issue and the consumers who were already in the "hell no global warming isn't happening" camp will be intensely supportive of the U.S. Chamber, which could result in some new memberships from companies led by Americans in this camp. Those who were already in the "yes it is and we should do something about it" camp will be loyal to the brands who've taken this stand, which could result in more sales for those brands. The interesting group to watch will be those consumers who've been on the fence.
Suzanne C. Shelton is founder, president and CEO of Shelton Group, an advertising agency focused exclusively on motivating mainstream consumers to make sustainable choices.
Forest photo CC-licensed by Flickr user josef.steufer.

Browse
Engage
Research










US Chamber: It's Time You Step Up!
Although the data is the data, there are times when an organization should really take an educated position on a divisive issue such as this.
As we've seen, the US Chamber of Commerce doesn't really seem to be representing the largest membership: small businesses. Instead they focus on special interests and revenue-generating activities.
As a result they are starting to become an obsolete entity. Unless they serious revamp and restructure their policies and tatics, they are in for a rocky ride.
For example, the White House is now taking them on. See today's Politico article, "White House plan: Neuter the Chamber": http://bit.ly/yxSnc.
Or the growing groups of businesses leaving the Chamber, larger ones including the likes of PE&G, Nike (left their Board) or the list you already mentioned.
More Congressional Representatives are joining the bandwagon as well, in part because their constituents do not see the Chamber's value and therefore they don't see their value.
“They are totally disconnected from the local chambers in my district,” said California Democratic Rep. Brad Sherman. “They’re blissfully unaware of any position taken by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.” according to Politico.
So, Chamber, it is time to step up and join mainstream and responsible business practices. If not, you'll continue to erode your membership and effectiveness.
Mine included. I am withdrawing my membership to the Manhattan Chamber of Commerce effective immediately!
Stefan Doering
http://www.bestcoachesinc.com
What about the science?
Decisions on serious issues like climate change should be made based on science, and input from scientists and other experts who actually understand the issues and the ramifications of various actions. The general population is underinformed and misinformed. "Insights" from the general population are worth little in this debate. The science alone should be enough to mode the Chamber in the right direction. If they fail to support real action, they will put their own businesses at greater risk from the social, environmental and economic impacts of climate change.
So many excuses for
So many excuses for complacency...so little time.
Support for cap-and-trade has evaporated
Daily I read editorials, comments and letters-to-the-editor from all over the nation. When the House passed the cap-and-trade bill it was maybe 2-to-1 against cap-and-trade, opinion now is off the charts against it.
Frankly, I don't see Americans supporting cap-and-trade or any CO2 regulation until we have our own 'Climate Truth Commission.' ...and no longer rely upon the climate opinions of the United Nations'. ...a biased political organization whose climate forecasts haven't proven prescient. The United States needs our own objective, transparent climate commission to think-through global warming.
-- Robert Moen, www.energyplanUSA
I believe you are misreading
I believe you are misreading the polls. The 15 percent who say they don't know what they believe are more likely leaners / low-information respondents. Lumping them in with the deniers and claiming that 40 percent of the public stands with the Chamber of Commerce is really quite outlandish. If leaners were pushed in that poll, it would probably be closer to 30 percent of the public which doubts that global warming is happening, which is just about the number of people who still approved of George Bush when he was leaving office.
Furthermore, what the Chamber is doing is well beyond a simple matter of opposing the legislation. It's intentionally trying to muddy the debate and it distorts science; in short it's a bad-faith actor in the public debate. A group which purports to represent all businesses in the US - including many businesses which would benefit directly and immediately from ACES! - should not be behaving this way. The Chamber's actions are highly irresponsible and are not at all in keeping with its stated mission.