By most measures, wind energy has been a great business lately.
The U.S. wind energy industry shattered previous records in 2008 by installing 8,358 megawatts (MW) of new generating capacity, and did even better in 2009, building out another 9,922 MW. That's enough wind power to deliver electricity to 4.4 million homes, according to the American Wind Energy Association.
But if you think it's easy -- or cheap -- to get wind-powered electricity to places where it's needed, talk to Tom King.
As the executive in charge of the U.S. business of National Grid, a global utility company with extensive operations in the Northeast, King would like to see wind turbines built off the coast of New England, as well as along a wind belt that stretches across the northern border of New York and runs east through Vermont, New Hampshire and Maine.
"When you look at the Northeast," King says, " it's bracketed by some very significant wind resources."
The trouble is, the wind blows offshore and up north, and the demand is in cities like New York, Boston and Providence. Connecting the supply with the demand is one problem. Cost is another.
King and I met this week in Washington to discuss wind. National Grid, the biggest utility company that most people don't know, is a London-based firm that dates back to 1990, when the U.K. privatized its electricity system. Since then, it has become, through acquisitions, one of the largest utility companies in the U.S., with about 8 million customers, nearly all in regulated markets. National Grid serves all of Rhode Island, nearly half of Massachusetts, roughly 20 percent of New York and a smaller number of customers in New Hampshire. Revenues topped $24 billion last year and it has about 27,500 employees, nearly two-thirds in the U.S.
National Grid has taken strong policy positions backing climate change legislation in the U.K. and the U.S. It has also promised to reduce its own greenhouse gas emissions by 80 percent by 2050. And the company supports renewable energy, says King.
"It's a key element of reducing carbon emissions," he says. "It's a matter of national security. It creates jobs and economic development."
Which all sounds great. But National Grid's efforts to support the offshore wind projects in New England reflect some of the challenges facing wind power. While the company doesn't develop projects, as the local regulated utility, its willingness to buy electricity from the projects is key to their viability. So National Grid has been negotiating deals–known as Power Purchase Agreements, or PPAs, with Deepwater Wind in Rhode Island and Cape Wind in Massachusetts.


Browse
Engage
Research










More about wind from Mary Gentry
The windpower bandwagon is accompanied by cynicism, and I for one have turned a bit cynical myself. There are glaring safety issues regarding the installation of wind turbines, and maintenance of the same.
The industry, as a whole, needs to regard safety of employees first, and foremost. One can look at the OSHA track record of the largest windpower company, Siemans, and see just how poorly safety is monitored.
I could get specific, for my husband has been home with a non union shattered femur for the better part of seven months. An injury sustained working in windpower. What's more, he is intelligent, promotes safety first, and did his best to ensure the employees were properly rested and monitored.
Unfortunately, the mad rush to install turbines and compete for monies pushed aside the single most important factor: safety. Digging deeply one will find that there are not specific regulations dealing with wind turbines. General Construction and Confined Space Entry OSHA regulations are not enough to ensure employees are safe on these sites.
The main problem is the fact that wind technicians travel all over the states installing and maintaining turbines. They arrive exhausted; go to the jobsite exhausted; and return exhausted. It is a shocking situation, and really should be examined by those to continue to push windpower.
In the end, this type of green means a great deal of unnoticed sacrifice by men, women and families. Funny how this side of the story is never mentioned.
Mary Gentry
China could have told you this years ago
They knew a long time ago that they need to redouble or triple their wind farms because all the studies written to build them in the first place were wrong. Only like 2% of their wind farms could meet their projected output. All the rest of them were way behind.