I've joined the laundry-detergent revolution. Well, revolution may be stretching it -- but changes unfolding (sorry!) in laundry rooms across America show how innovation can move us closer to a sustainable economy.
The revolution metaphor is useful because it's a reminder that real innovation is more likely to be driven by upstarts, insurgents and rebels -- like Method, one of my favorite companies -- than by powerful incumbents who want to preserve the status quo.
Take a look:
Over the last several years, big, wasteful jugs of laundry detergent like this one from Procter & Gamble's Tide have all but disappeared from grocery store shelves. These jugs were good for marketing people who plastered messages on the package but they weren't good for anyone else.
Today, the new normal is concentrated 2x (meaning half the liquid in every load) detergents like Unilever's Small and Mighty All, which use less packaging and water, saving money on shipping costs and waste. Tide sells lots of 2x as well.. The 2x packages are convenient, easy to store and pour. 
But the greenest, smartest and most innovative detergent is an 8x concentrate from Method, which uses less water in a smaller package and should save consumers money. This is good for everyone except news P&G or Unilever, which have profited from the overdosing of laundry, as we'll explain.
Method is a privately-held company that was started in 2000 by Adam Lowry, a former climate scientist, and his friend Eric Ryan in their San Francisco bachelor pad. It has grown into a company with more than $100 million in revenues, and an impact bigger than its size. Method introduced the first concentrated laundry detergent -- a 3x concentrate -- to the mass market back in 2004 through Target. A year or so later, amidst much fanfare, Unilever and Wal-Mart followed with a 2x Small and Mighty All. By most accounts P&G, the king of the detergent shelf with such brands as Tide, Gain and Era, came along later, under pressure from Wal-Mart.
Adam, who is 35, spoke about Method, innovation and green marketing earlier this month at FORTUNE's Brainstorm Green conference. We caught up the other day by phone to talk about how and why Method has become a sustainability leader.
There's a tension, Adam argues, between size and innovation. "When you think about companies that dominate our economy, these are not organizations that welcome change and they are not usually nimble organizations," he says. "The general model, for big companies, is to design something, build a patent fortress around it, and then extract as much profit as you can until the product runs its course."
"Market leaders thrive when markets are static," he adds.
Pushing towards sustainable models requires just the opposite -- persistent innovation. "We need to be willing to take what makes us money today and throw it out the window and replace it with something that's better, greener and a lot less certain," he says.
This restless desire to improve led to the path-breaking 8x product, which packs enough detergent to do 50 loads of wash into a 20 fluid oz bottle that sells for $15 at Method's website, at Amazon or at major retailers including Costco, Target and Wal-Mart. There's a $2 off coupon, as I write this, at the Method site.)














A part of the solution but
A part of the solution but not the least !
In France -and Canada- we found some green products like L'Arbre vert (Green Tree) : http://www.arbrevert.fr
For the companie, you win when you product it; because you don't need to clean every time the tanks,
you don't spend so much water, and win time to produce.
You win energy / save CO2 and money
you reduce the number of bottles
you save water in the bottles from the river where is the companie : you don't spend the water only in 1 site but in all over the country
you save oil and trucks on the road, to reduce pollution + CO2
the final buyer save money and time -he don't need to buy futher time the bottles-
It's good the the sellers -like WALLMART- zho see a good turnover for this kind of products.
EASELY !?
Jérôme
green marketing
I don't agree that it is a mistake to market products as green. As a business your main goal is to make money. Thanks to green washing consumers will be more likely to buy the product if it is marketed as green. Also i dont think that methods detergent will be very popular at such a steep price.
how do you save on water?
correct me if i misunderstood the concept of 2x or 8x concentration.
the product itself uses less water in the container right?
but the user will need to water when he uses it to "de-concentrate" the soap mixture right?
so it is just shifting the water usage from manufacturer to user right?
You don't have to ship the water, package and sell it
The product saves on fossil fuel consumption by avoiding need to ship water in the soap product over long distances to the stores and homes of consumers.
The real model put forth by Interface would be to sell the cleaning properties itself-- if we could get that far with product stewardship in this regard somehow.
I'd rather not buy a new pump every time. I hope Method has a way to reduce that waste too.
I'm still using a bucket of high-efficiency powdered detergent from Sears that I bought 9 years ago for about $25, it does about 300 loads. They sell refills in cardboard cartons and I just keep refilling the bucket.
RE: how do you save on water?
No because the washing machine doesn't use any more water because you change detergents. It uses the same amount of water for each load. But the manufacturer would use less water in making something 8x concentrated than 2x concentrated.
??
There is something wrong with your math.
8x concentrated maybe it means that the manufacturer uses 7x less water right?
But the user needs to add 7x water at home. the washing machine only holds a fix
amount of water. therefore the amount of water needed for de-concentration of the
soap will lessen the amount of clothes that will go into the tub?
soap+clothes+water=z. z is the amount of water,soap & clothes that the machine can hold and
will always be the same.
also the user will more often than not use more of the concentrated soap than is really
needed. people tend to want to see more suds because this relate to cleaning power.
more suds then equate to more water that will be needed to remove the suds. thence
8x concentration will mean more water usage on the home front. i would want the manufacturer
to give the correct blend.
as to transportation and fuel, that is a wrong way at looking at it. a cargo truck will
always fill its bay to maximum capacity. whether it is 7x more water or 2x more water.
so fuel consumption will be the same which way you want to look at it. the truck will
not be using 7x less fuel because it carries a 8x concentrated soap product.