A new liability is coming onto the collective balance sheet of companies around the world: Carbon.
In the context of increasing awareness of the business and societal risks of climate change, corporate carbon emissions (and the energy consumption that creates them) are becoming a crucial indicator of business performance. And a new type of software platform, enterprise carbon and energy management (ECEM), is emerging to enable companies to monitor, manage, and report corporate carbon emissions, as well as the energy consumption which is their principal source.
Companies have long used software systems to track and manage the movement of assets around the company -- people, money, parts and finished goods, and other hard assets like IT systems or furniture. Enterprises buy and maintain sophisticated systems to manage employees (human capital management [HCM]), customers (customer relationship management [CRM]), financial accounting and auditing, materials and finished goods (enterprise resource planning [ERP]), and IT systems and network management.
Now, ECEM systems are poised to join this list of backbone enterprise software systems. Adoption is driven by managers' desire to:
- Improve operational efficiency. Reducing energy consumption and related emissions requires running company operations more efficiently. Very simply, lower energy consumption means lower energy bills either per unit of output (relative terms) or in total (absolute terms).
- Communicate business metrics to stakeholders. A company's carbon footprint, reduction targets, and progress toward those targets are becoming standard business metrics that the firm must regularly communicate to constituencies including customers, shareholders, employees, and regulators.
- Differentiate operations, product, and brand. Progressive companies have seized on carbon management and aggressive reductions in emissions as a central element of their brand positioning with consumers.
- Comply with regulatory mandates. Governments around the world are stepping in to regulate where business and customer pressure is not sufficient to encourage corporations to act on carbon emissions. So large companies -- especially heavy-emitters -- are facing implementation in 2010 and 2011 of regimes like the UK's Carbon Reduction Commitment (CRC) and regulation from the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under the aegis of the Clean Air Act.
- Mitigate the business risks of climate change. Companies are increasingly cognizant of the material business risks that a changing climate will cause (for example, disruption of raw materials supply) and incorporating such risk assessments into their planning and investment plans. In the U.S., for example, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) now requires companies to include assessment of climate change risks in their financial reporting.
To meet these goals, companies need systematic processes that are instantiated in software systems. Retracing the evolution of other process-management software systems, companies are finding that ad hoc activities documented in spreadsheets no longer meet their requirements.
They need a true system of record that cuts across operational or functional silos, taps into multiple asset classes and data sources, creates structured databases of auditable information, analyzes and displays information in a role-sensitive manner, and provides return paths to the assets to enable action and management (see Figure 1 for a high-level sketch of ECEM system architecture).















As with any major application
As with any major application systems there are always risks. Not only from a security (logical access) standpoint but also from an application controls perspective. If proper controls such as segregation of duties relating to account setup, user functionality restriction as per their duties, and account activity monitoring.
The nature of these types of software is that they are providing an accounting of carbon usage and credits. This area is ripe for fraud.
The Association of Certified Green Technology Auditors (TheACGTA.org)has a Certification Program for individuals that will be reviewing these application systems. It is their Certified Green Technology Auditor (CGTA)designation. It is currently offered on a grandfathering basis to qualified professionals. However, at some point, it will be available only by sitting for a comprehensive professional examination.
While I think this an
While I think this an important corporate function, I don't see it becoming a new, major application area. Read my rationale here: http://nearwalden.com/blog/2010/10/two-reasons-why-carbon-management-sof...
Nice blog these business
Nice blog these business management software are really the best for managing the business.
You make mention of the
You make mention of the burgeoning number of suppliers in the ECEM market. Our company has been hesitant to move forward with a system because 1) ECEMs commonly require (or strongly suggest) expensive program set-up services, which are vital to an ECEM's success or ability to produce reliable and valuable information 2) there are too many to choose from--why pay a $50k/yr license for one, when there are others (typically beta versions) offered for free--how do we know which service offers the best value, if we don't know what types of results/information constitute value in the carbon market? 3) measuring carbon emissions is not a business imperative for us at this point--the science behind measuring carbon emissions is inconsistent at best, and because of that our ability to compare companies and products is compromised. So what's the point in allocating valuable resources to something that's going to potentially produce meaningless/unuseful results?
I'm not as skeptical about ECEMs as might be perceived from this comment--just cautious about picking the right one. Looking forward to what this market has to offer as the technology develops. Seems like we need to nail down a more solid set of GHG calculation standards (beyond ISO and GRI) that software systems can work around. Can you recommend any ECEMs by name in this setting? Thanks for posting.
(wrote this in about 5 mins before leaving the office, so excuse anything I may have read over in your article)
Will, I see where you're
Will,
I see where you're coming from when you talk about the need for consistent, accurate data.
Check out Summit Energy's ECEM product, dashboarDView. It's a managed solution for collecting and reporting emissions and usage data. Summit Energy coordinates the collection, organization and verification of all of an organization's sustainability and carbon data.
A traditional software approach can't assure reliable results or solid calculation standards because they leave it up to the 'software-user' to enter all the data correctly, etc. Check out the website www.summitenergygps.com to dig in a little more.