In the fall of 2000, a small but visionary group of environmental entrepreneurs bet big on our clean energy future. We believed we could create jobs and spur growth by investing in secure and renewable sources of power, new ways to recycle, and the next generation of energy and resource efficient cars, homes and workplaces.
A decade later, we're no longer small -- and we're no longer going on faith. The group we founded -- Environmental Entrepreneurs, or E2 -- represents business leaders who've founded 1,100 companies that have created 500,000 jobs in 41 states.
Putting half a million Americans to work is a monumental accomplishment at any time. It's near miraculous, though, to do so during the worst recession since World War II, when nearly one worker in 10 can't find a job.
The clean energy sector is just getting started. While traditional industries shed jobs, in fact, we're leading our economy into a future ripe with promise.
Just a few years ago, the wind energy sector barely existed. Now it employs 85,000 Americans, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
These are good jobs. They typically pay anywhere between $41,500 a year for a machinist to $95,000 a year for a top engineer. And they're not just in states like Texas, Iowa and California, the leaders in wind energy production.
Americans are making wind turbines in South Carolina, blades in South Dakota, steel for towers in Indiana, electrical components in Ohio. Workers in other states across the country produce the concrete, aluminum, fiberglass, rubber, generators, gears and other materials and equipment that go into making wind turbines.
Other examples abound:
- Just outside of Pittsburgh, 150 laid-off workers at a once-shuttered factory have gone back to work, making energy-efficient windows for offices and homes.
- In Caledonia, Wisc., contractors have refitted an old radiator factory to produce bricks that require one-tenth the energy to produce as conventional bricks.
- Brightsource Energy, an Oakland, Calif., solar energy company, is creating thousands of construction jobs in the Southwest to build a series of state of the art solar farms that will supply neighboring states with clean energy.
The clean energy sector has created entire professions that didn't exist just five years ago. Chief sustainability officers are in demand at Fortune 500 companies. Production managers are being hired to oversee biofuels production, cogeneration operations and energy efficiency accounting.

Browse
Engage
Research










Yes, it’s true. Green jobs
Yes, it’s true. Green jobs are no longer a myth. But, is it realistic to expect jobs from an investment in new ways of recycling? The article touts the growth of green jobs in the manufacturing and construction sectors triggered by solar and wind projects. Success occurs here because the pay out is obvious—after the infrastructure is in place, consumers will continually pay for power and energy. So, investors are willing to support the required large-scale, transformational change (which includes hiring and training the right people) for the promise of future pay out.
However, this is not the case for recycling. Most recycling programs today are subsidized and unprofitable. Sorting recyclable materials is enormously expensive. In fact, most programs are only feasible when using free labor from prisons to reduce costs. Without the promise of future pay out, investment in this sector will remain low, recycling technology will develop slowly and it will not be a source of green jobs. I hope I’m wrong. Am I missing something? Is there a potential pay out from an investment in recycling?
Once again we receive proof
Once again we receive proof that there is such a thing as a green economy.