When does 9 miles a gallon sound just dandy -- environmentally and businesswise -- to a longtime sustainability stalwart like me?
No, it's not because I've sold out and traded my Camry hybrid for a fire-sale Escalade.
We're talking trucks here -- those big, hulking semis filling your rearview mirror on the interstate plus their smaller cousins, right on down to delivery vans.
Here's the deal: The Environmental Protection Agency and National Highway Traffic Safety Administration are considering new mileage standards for that fleet -- which burns up 20 percent of America's transportation fuel and emits the same share of the country's carbon pollution.
Right now heavy-duty trucks -- a huge part of the way we move products around in this country -- are clocking just 6 miles per gallon. And the technology is there -- the Union of Concerned Scientists describes it as "existing and near term" -- to move that number by a lot. Maybe even to 9 mpg.
And if the entire fleet right down to delivery vans could move to just a 9.7 mpg average, UCS says that would save 100 billion gallons of diesel over the next two decades, topping out at 11 billion gallons in 2030 alone.
Still hung up on that single-digit number? Let me put it this way: Wouldn't you gladly embrace a 50 percent increase in fuel efficiency, with its commensurately smaller carbon footprint, in any other sector of the economy?
I would, in a heartbeat.
So it's time -- during the official public comment period going on right now -- to send the EPA and NHTSA a message: Go for that high-end single digit.
And not just because it's good for the environment -- it also makes all kinds of good business, economic and competitiveness sense.
Let's start with the pure business argument, and it's simple: Does free sound attractive?
Because that's what a conversion to higher-mileage trucks would cost -- exactly nothing over a typical ownership period. In fact you'd actually make money. The thousands of gallons in per-truck fuel savings will more than pay for the higher costs of a more efficient engine, according to a CALSTART study.
Now let's move to the macro-economic. UCS and CALSTART say those benefits will also accrue to the wider economy, since as truck operating costs come down business owners and consumers reap savings they can invest in more goods and services -- most all of them in America, as opposed to where our fuel money goes.
Competitiveness? Here's news worth knowing: The U.S. is a global leader in efficient truck engine development and manufacturing. So stricter standards will expand the global market for that domestic product while providing the certainty that catalyzes investment in those technologies. According to CALSTART, the 15,000 U.S. jobs now directly tied to hybrid and high-efficiency truck technology can grow, in just the coming decade, to more than 55,000 with appropriate policies.














The two comments before me
The two comments before me are from people who obviously have no clue how the transportation sector and freight handling (and its vehicles) work or should work.
First, assuming a truck can be compared to a car in shape or economy is just ludicrous. To make a fair comparison (apples to apples), you'd have to compare TON MILES per gallon, not just miles per gallon. If you do that, you'll see that your Prius gets about 1.8 ton miles per gallon. Try putting more stuff in your car and delivering it somewhere the next time you drive..
As for moving things by train, that's a suggestion by someone who knows nothing about the rail system. Try shipping something by train. Go ahead. See how fast it gets there. Good luck with that. Know what the problem is? It's not the rails or the way they handle freight. It's the unions who've managed to screw up every aspect of the rails and make them logistically impossible. So even at $4/gallon, trucking has become the better alternative.
Exactly. And don't give me
Exactly. And don't give me this bull about 9MPGS. We can can do waaaaay better. Have you seen the shape of a truck? Its a wall moving through space.... Like WTF?? Not an iota of aeronautical ingenuity in the last mmmhhh...ever since there were trucks! We have the technology to do this. Electric motors have massive torque which is exactly what trucks rely on-this is common knowledge. The underside of each trailer could be a battery pack. It would hold enough juice to do a lot of traveling. Combine a massive quick charging battery pack with the cab of the truck in the shape of a bullet, and we all will be laughing. Making battery packs that large would justify further expanding mass production of batteries, which would drastically bring down the price. Fossil fuels are subsidized more than 12 times more than renewable technologies. Cut those by 90%, fossil fuel companies make billions of dollars anyways which are barely taxed since it is all sent offshore, and send the subsidies to new green technologies that need it now especially considering the state of the planet. Its going to happen, you will see. If you come across this post, don't except the bull you read concerning thing like "ne ne naa increase mileage to 9mgs, or blah blah blah the volt is such an amazing car, weh weh wehhh, it will effect other industries' jobs. I SAY BULLS**T, WE ARE SICK OF OBSOLETE TECHNOLOGIES, AND SICK OR HEARING HOW IT WILL TAKE AWAY JOBS AND COST TOO MUCH. SUBSIDIES WILL CREATE MORE JOBS, REDUCE THE POWER OF SO CALLED "AMERICAN" COMPANIES AND INCREASE GROWTH OF NEW COMPANIES AS WELL AS INDUSTRY, AND INCREASE THE QUALITY OF LIFE EVERYWHERE!!!!!!! WAAAAAKKKKEEEE UUUUPPPPP WE HAVE THE TECHNOLOGY.
Here's a better idea: if it
Here's a better idea: if it has to move more than 500 miles it goes by train. OTR trucking needs to END.