CES, the massive trade show for the consumer electronics industry, kicks off tomorrow in Las Vegas. This year's event continues a trend we've highlighted for the past three years -- here, here and here -- of an ever-more-prominent focus on sustainability and green IT.
Although CES is unlikely to ever be known primarily as a green technology conference, the Consumer Electronics Association (the trade group that puts on CES every year) has made strides in greening both the materials on offer and the event itself. There's an extensive list of the ways CES is reducing its environmental impacts on the CES website, including cutting paper printing by 50 percent, recycling nearly two-thirds of the waste from the show and choosing venues that have worked to cut water and energy use.
But by its very nature, the trade show is still going to have a huge carbon footprint, and be responsible for thousands of tons of waste. ON24, a vendor of virtual meeting solutions, has estimated the impacts of this year's CES based on Conservation International's Carbon Calculator, and come up with a carbon footprint of 179,000 tons of CO2 emissions for the four-day event.
ON24 of course has a vested interest in promoting virtual meetings instead of or in addition to physical gatherings, and CES, with a reliance on hands-on experiences with the latest in technology, would be perhaps the least likely candidate for an all-virtual gathering. (As a wide digression, perhaps the most likely candidate would be the annual Adult Entertainment Expo sideshow at CES, but that's another story entirely.)
But in an interview yesterday, ON24's Chief Marketing Officer, Denise Persson, said that even events that rely on in-person experiences can benefit from what she called a "hybrid event" -- part physical, and part virtual.
"The green benefits of virtual events are becoming more and more relevant to our customers," Persson said, "and hybrid events let companies reach an even larger audience than they can in a physical event."
She added that there are a number of reasons why people are cutting back on their business travel: "For environmental, safety reasons, cost reasons, for personal productivity reasons -- people don't want to travel as much as they wanted to before. If they can gain the same knowledge and insights without traveling, then so much the better."

Browse
Engage
Research









The big question is, can you
The big question is, can you "gain the same insights and learnings" through just virtual events, or even hybrid events? In some cases you likely can. When you look at a large technology conference like CES or Oracle OpenWorld (thanks for the shout out Midori), then there is a good likelihood that your experience will be diminished by lack of both hands on experiences with the technology and the face to face networking opportunities that are just inherently different in a physical environment over an emulated physical environment like a virtual event.
The bigger challenge we see (and I'll make the same disclaimers as Midori, also being a GMIC Board Member), is whether the event industry will take seriously the impacts it does have and begin to change behavior, from both a planning perspective as well as an attendee perspective to make their events more sustainable.
I'm glad to see CES taking steps to reduce the overall impact of their event, but sustainability does go well beyond simple green practices, as Midori points out, and involves some serious steps to look across the entire cycle of an event. For CES this is likely further complicated by the very process of manufacturing, transporting to market and disposal of the mass of electronics materials that are produced, not only for the show, but for the broader market.
None of this is to say though that events such as CES or Oracle OpenWorld or any other large conference/tradeshow should not exist or should only be done virtually. We just need to start being smarter about how we plan, how we reduce impact and how we bring in the right technologies for virtual participation when it adds to our business goals.
Hybrid meetings blend
Hybrid meetings blend technology and face-to-face meetings so it is not an either/or decision. The ability to gather as a group--close to home--and work virtually with other "pods" around the world is a solution being readily adopted by the meeting industry. It is our next step in the evolution of meetings.
Technology Industry companies were the early adopters of the green meetings movement. Using their creative expertise, they developed really cool tools to help meeting managers save the environment and save money. We look forward to a continued partnership as we imagine the future of meetings together.
Nancy J. Zavada
MeetGreen
There is an extensive amount
There is an extensive amount of work being done to ensure our face to face meetings are executed with minimal impact to the environment, beyond just paper reduction and reduction of water bottles.
You might take a moment to visit the Green Meeting Industry Council's website:
http://www.greenmeetings.info
--Fine Print: I am a Board Member of the Green Meeting Industry Council, but have no financial stake in promoting the organization :)
Another great way to look at green meetings is Oracle Open World, the world's largest information technology gathering.
See the report here:
http://www.oracle.com/ocom/groups/public/@ocom/documents/webcontent/1937...
At the end of the day, we all need to continue our quest to reduce our environmental impact, but these meetings really must continue. There are an abundant number of studies to counter all of the virtual vendor "studies" showing the reasons to meet virtually. It is important to consider all of the aspects, and I'm impressed that you included the quote from Alcorn which briefly covers this point.
It's a fuzzy area when it
It's a fuzzy area when it comes to travel and the environment. Yes there are all of the environmental impacts of the travel, but travel is and always will be necessary. If it weren't for travel we wouldn't be here right now.
I'd like to think that the technologies that they are promoting will help to at least negate some of that impact and not just a PR ploy.