In the internet age, are the yellow pages still relevant? In fact, do phone books contribute anything more than massive amounts of waste?
That's a question that San Francisco thinks it has an answer to. (Hint: It's pretty much "no." To both questions.)
The city will continue its environmental initiatives by passing a law that will ban the distribution of phone books unless phone book publishers obtain prior consent from individuals and businesses to drop the books off.
San Francisco Board of Supervisors president David L. Chiu is expected to introduce the legislation today at City Hall. San Francisco Chronicle staff writer Rachel Gordon has a good look at the proposed law in today's paper (another increasingly obsolete technology...).
Gordon writes:
Under the proposal, phone companies and other distributors and publishers of Yellow Pages phone books would be barred from leaving them on doorsteps and in lobbies without receiving advance permission.
The Yellow Page companies could contact consumers by e-mail, direct mail, phone solicitations or in person, asking if they would like the directory. If the response is positive, the phone book could be delivered. Consumers also would be able to pick them up at a distribution center.
Unsolicited deliveries, however, could result in fines of up to $500 for each violation. The law would be enforced by the city's Department of the Environment.
The white pages -- whose general distribution is mandated by state law -- would not be affected. Dual white and Yellow Pages phone books would have to abide by the new restrictions, if they are approved.
The publishers of yellow pages and white pages alike are obviously concerned about the law. When Seattle suggested a similar ban last year, publishers sued the city, citing free speech issues.
Phone books are of course big business for the publishers, which fill the yellow pages with ads for services. But the big books are also responsible for even bigger amounts of waste: The Chronicle's Rachel Gordon cites the Product Stewardship Institute's estimates that local governments spend about $54 million every year to dispose of unwanted phone books, and another $9 million per year to recycle them.
Read the full article in the Chronicle and let us know in the comments below: In the age of Google (or Bing, or Ask, or whatever), when was the last time you used the Yellow Pages?
Photo CC-licensed by How Can I Recycle This?














I'd love to be
I'd love to be recycling.
Waste Management rolled out recycle bins. I was just getting the hang of recycling. Two weeks later, sorry, made error, wrong company picking up trash, was switched to Republic Services, no recycling. Have a nice recycle bin left over to keep my motorcycle parts in.
I thought phone books were
I thought phone books were recycled??
I work for a local phonebook
I work for a local phonebook in the central valley. The phone is made of recycle paper. It takes no trees to publish a phonebook.
This is only a good idea if
This is only a good idea if people will have access to the information via computer at locations where the phone book would have been, I.E. pay phone or library or mall. This could be more costly because of vandalism.
Show me a single pay phone in
Show me a single pay phone in San Francisco. kthxbai
I use the yellow pages all
I use the yellow pages all the time. Why not ban library books and all things made of paper. How about your purchase receipts. Birth certificates napkins and diapers after all they can only be used once unless you use the other side . The paper cups at star bucks? That way you can drink out of your Macchiato out of hands and all the trees are safe. The yellow pages are used over and over and are already 100%
I use the yellow pages all
I use the yellow pages all the time. Why not ban library books and all things made of paper. How about your purchase receipts. Birth certificates napkins and diapers after all they can only be used once unless you use the other side . The paper cups at star bucks? That way you can drink out of your Macchiato out of hands and all the trees are safe. The yellow pages are used over and over and are already 100%
Did you not read the article
Did you not read the article at all?
If people want the yellow pages, they will be delivered. They're not banning it from the city completely. They're just trying to cut back on unwanted waste. Why is this so evil in your opinion?
This is wonderful news! I
This is wonderful news! I launched an environmental initiative called Yellow Page Mountain to stop the wasteful mass printing of the Yellow Pages. Find us on Facebook, Twitter #yellowpagemountain and YouTube (/yellowpagemountain). Watch the video and find out how to opt out until they ban the printing!
If you are rich enough to
If you are rich enough to have a computer. If not, screw you. You don't deserver to know about this, or to have access to phone numbers.
This is wonderful news! I
This is wonderful news! I launched an environmental initiative called Yellow Page Mountain to stop the wasteful mass printing of the Yellow Pages. Find us on Facebook, Twitter #yellowpagemountain and YouTube (/yellowpagemountain). Watch the video here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GYTwMV7ZISo and find out how to opt out until they ban the printing!
This is wonderful news! I
This is wonderful news! I launched an environmental initiative called Yellow Page Mountain to stop the wasteful mass printing of the Yellow Pages. Find us on Facebook, Twitter #yellowpagemountain and YouTube (/yellowpagemountain). Watch the video here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GYTwMV7ZISo and find out how to opt out until they ban the printing!
Why not got farther and allow
Why not got farther and allow us to opt out of receiving fliers addressed to "resident" in our mailbox or junk mail in general. At least allow us to opt out of getting fliers pasted to our house or tossed in our yards. Thieves can always tell I've left town for a couple weeks when I have 5 or 6 fliers rubber-banded to my doorknob and front porch pillars.
This certainly makes sense.
This certainly makes sense. What is the point in giving someone a phone book if no one really wants it. You have everything available over the internet any way.
Those people who still want one can always opt to receive it.
Genius. Now all we need is a
Genius. Now all we need is a ban on junk mail.
SF is asking for a lawsuit if
SF is asking for a lawsuit if they try to ban the books. The industry already has an opt out process if someone has their knickers so twisted that they don't want a book
There isn't an opt-out for
There isn't an opt-out for this. I've tried. I've contacted phone book companies and have even quoted Mitch Hedberg stating that giving me a phonebook is just asking me to throw away their trash, to no avail. The only way I know to not get a phonebook is catching the person delivering them and putting it back onto their truck, which my quick-thinking wife did a few months ago.
The opt-out is available to
The opt-out is available to everyone, and for almost every book published. A simple phone call to use the opt-out is the best way to save redwoods from being chopped down for books. I believe San Francisco is under the impression that 1 book = 1 dead 400-year-old redwood. So opt-out and save a redwood!
NO trees are cutdown to make
NO trees are cutdown to make a phonebook. They are on recycled paper.
My husband phoned the company
My husband phoned the company who issued the phone book. Pointed out that we have no business relationship to that business. Requested that they remove their "litter" from our front porch. Was persistent enough that they did, indeed, send someone out to remove the "litter". Unfortunately, the next year they did the same littering.
I agree ... it's much easier to catch them dropping off the books, open the door, and say politely but firmly, "Excuse me, we do not want this" while handing back their litter.
I can't believe you are
I can't believe you are typing into a computer and wasting precious bytes of memory! Oh wait...computer memory is renewable just like trees, so I guess you're ok.
So you're saying that because
So you're saying that because trees can grow back eventually if replanted that we should go ahead with clearcutting?
Forests are only a renewable resource if managed intelligently. Computer memory returns as soon as you delete something else; forests take decades or, in the case of old-growth forests, centuries to renew.
technically fossil fuels are also renewable resources. They just take millions of years to renew.
We are losing our forests - sure they're renewable, but not nearly renewable enough to justify cutting them down willy-nilly.
If you don't want a phone book, it should be easy to opt out.
That said, I find a sign (even just a piece of paper) saying "please, do not leave newspapers/phone books/junk mail helps to reduce waste by quite a bit. Although the Junk mail one doesn't work nearly as well as the other two criteria.