The paradox about sustainable business, say some, is that there are too many standards and not enough metrics. There's truth to that, though it's misleading. For all of the hundreds of eco-labels and certifications, there remain huge gaps -- product categories where there are few or no labels or certifications, from cars to clothing to cosmetics.
Many of the existing standards and certifications are limited in scope, focusing on, say, energy consumption or greenhouse gas emissions, but not necessarily on any of several other impacts a given product may impose on the environment.
A number of organizations are stepping in to fill the gaps. Underwriters Laboratories is one example: Its UL Environment division began issuing a range of standards in 2010, such as one for cell phones that takes into account their entire lifecycle, from raw material extraction to customer use to disposal. (UL Environment is also partnering with GreenBiz to create a company-level sustainability standard, ULE 880, intended for manufacturing firms.) Green Seal expanded its scope with a new pilot standard that seeks to certify the sustainability of an entire company. The group's new GS-C1 certification is aimed at consumer goods manufacturers.
Some standards are coming from companies themselves. UPS launched a green standard for responsible packaging, which allows customers to ship their goods with a label attesting to that fact. Its Eco Responsible Packaging Program evaluates a customer's shipment packaging in three key areas -- damage prevention, rightsizing and packaging materials. The goal is to use the least packaging that offers the greatest protection. A group of apparel and footwear companies, including Levi's, Patagonia, and Timberland, banded together to launch the Eco Index, a set of guidelines, indicators and metrics for measuring the lifecycle impacts of their products. Meanwhile, Nike created a one-screen Environmental Apparel Design Tool, in which designers plug in what materials they're using, how much recycled or organic content they have, and other details. The tool gives the design an environmental score. Nike made the tool available for other companies to use. And Timberland announced that its Green Index, which rates the environmental footprint of about one in seven pairs of shoes it sells, will be applied to all of its footwear by the end of 2012.

Browse
Engage
Research











. . . . . more with you. .
. . . . . more with you. .
Just in case there was any ambiguity resulting from the unfortunate truncation of my opening sentence in the post above.
Hi Joel, I couldn't agree
Hi Joel,
I couldn't agree with you more. Having worked in sustainable metrics for a decade and more, I've seen organisations and industries shift from a position in which it was assumed that 'the answer' would be miraculously born from the morass of numbers which were obsessively collected about their operations, to one in which the question is first properly articulated and numbers are then used sparingly to give the answer.
However, there are still too few intelligent measures that give clear and unambiguous answers to key questions. And there continue to be gaps in consumer sustainability understanding of some of the key items that they interact with every day. Mobile phones are an excellent example, which is why we're pleased to be feeding in to the development of the ULE mobile phone standard, and to ensure that it sits comfortably alongside the sustainability rating scheme which Telefonica O2 launched last year.
This looks at the total sustainability of a device across its entire lifecyle, including the sustainability services that it can deliver to users, and displays the result as a single, easy-to understand metric. It was developed with the major handset manufacturers over the course of a year, and has a stakeholder panel of manufacturers and other key stakeholders to develop it into the future.
Which is all well and good, but really wouldn't matter if it wasn't succeeding in delivering the answers and the outcomes needed. Thankfully, however, it is. Whilst there is growing consumer interest & awareness of the impacts (good and bad) of a mobile phone as a result of it, what is even more interesting is the impact it has with the manufacturers - who are using it to improve the sustainability of their devices & strive for the top spots.
More info and details of the methodology can be found here:
http://www.forumforthefuture.org/projects/eco-ratings
James