Google "why brands fail" and you'll be rewarded with upwards of 18 million matches.
Given this abundance of expertise on the subject, you'd think creating bulletproof brands would be as easy as tying your laces. And yet, brands are crashing and burning as much as they always have. Probably more so.
Why? Well, the 5 or 6 articles I read on the subject (I didn't manage the full 18 million) certainly don't help.
Almost all focused on predicting what had already happened -- why brands had succumbed in the past. A bit like predicting someone's death after they'd died.
Truth is, it's much more difficult to point out predictors of future success. Especially in a world rocked by massive cultural migration, climate change, economic upheaval and revolutionary new forms of communication.
Having spent some time building brands at the intersection of sustainability, innovation, insight and design, I believe I've gathered some useful battle wisdom. I'd like to share it by describing five pillars I believe will help brands survive, and thrive in our brave new world.
1. Sustainability
I founded a green brand agency in the heady Al Gore days. At that time, I believed sustainability would become the brand megatrend of the 21st century.
I was right. And very wrong.
Sustainability does make business sense. In a world of diminishing resources, heightened environmental legislation and vigilant NGO's, it is a smart brand insurance policy.
But sustainability is also a political wedge. Mention green, and 50 percent of Americans run away, while the other 50 percent cringe and wonder how much more it will cost.
Smart brands like Nike believe the solution is to incorporate sustainability into their brands, but not use sustainability as a selling feature. If brands were an onion, you'd have to peel back a few layers to discover the green technology in Nike shoes.
This is smart for two reasons.
First, it prevents sustainability from upstaging the brand's key attributes. Nike's are about technology that enable athletic performance. Period.
Second, sustainability becomes a hidden reward for brand mavens to discover. They can unearth the sustainability story with a few clicks, then spread the news themselves. On the other hand, those wanting to lambast Nike for environmental omissions will be pleasantly surprised to peel back layer after layer of sustainability initiatives, culminating in the company's comprehensive Corporate Responsibility report.
2. Innovation
My green brand agency was acquired by one of North America's premier innovation agencies, which allowed me to work in a field that defines progress for business.
What I learned was that far too many companies are ill-equipped to produce a steady stream of innovation. Most approached it haphazardly ... there were a few pet projects in the pipeline, and little to no methodology for producing a steady stream of new products, services and business models.

Browse
Engage
Research









I am in the "cringe" category
I am in the "cringe" category you describe above. We really do need to be striving for sustainability to be integrated into a brand, and have those brands keep quiet about it.
Brands that are saying they are "green" are really saying that they are behind the times by about five years. Brands that are talking about their sustainability challenges, goals, and trajectory are nailing it.
I would also add "Personality" to this list. The nameless, faceless logo approach that reigned supreme in branding for the past fifty years is now dead. People want to connect with other people - and businesses that have an authentic personality and share that personality with the world are more likely to stick around and thrive.
Some good information here
Some good information here but I also would add "Walking the Talk."
Because we do operate in a world of transparency, "Green" brands must live up to the principles they espouse.
I work with SME organizations many of whom operate as sustainably-driven organizations yet they lack what I would consider proof points for such an organization.
Do they measure their carbon and have a plan for reduction?
Do they offset their carbon?
What framework for sustainability are they using to measure progress?
Do they issue a public report to stakeholders about their progress?
Are they a B-Corporation?
Have they benchmarked themselves using B-Lab's public tool?