It was with particular interest that I took in a Board of Trade presentation on the state of British Columbia's green economy. After all, Vancouver is vying for the Greenest City In The World title. Green business is a big deal out here.
The presentation, by Paul Shorthouse of the Globe Foundation, was a convincing and positive one. There was plenty of evidence we were moving in the right direction.
But my fellow Board members were less than resounding in their endorsement. Time after time, the presentation got bogged down in debate.
The biggest bone of contention turned out to be language. There was no shared perception of what 'Green Economy' even meant -- or should mean.
I spoke with Shorthouse after his presentation. Turns out our reaction wasn't unique. Green is a loaded word. Tie it to "economy," and you have the makings of a perfect storm.
There's the specter that green business sacrifices return on the altar of values. Even if you get past this, you're stuck with the conundrum of how to weight green inputs and outputs. As Shorthouse said, "Is it green infrastructure if it creates lower emissions, but requires high resource use for construction? Is it green energy if it means burning waste for power?"
Green has become a political hornet's nest in our province. Even bike lanes are a powder keg. And this is the left coast we're talking about.
Shorthouse believes it comes down to green by choice vs. green by necessity. "We haven't seen enough shock to force us to fast-track change. Vancouver isn't faced with nuclear reactors melting down after a tsunami. Instead, we're trying to push forward without a stick, and only a very distant carrot. People don't like that."
The Brand Is Broken
As a creative director with a passion for green innovation, I've seen brand after brand, company after company, institution after institution, struggle with the thorniness of 'green.'
I believe it all comes down to how to brand sustainability -- if you brand it at all.
From my own experience, I believe the brand of sustainability is broken. If we're to build a green future, it won't be by waving the green flag.
So what if, instead of talking about Vancouver's green economy, we just spoke of our innovation economy?
As Ram Nidumolu, CK Prahalad and MR Rangaswami pointed out in their Harvard Business Review article, "Why Sustainability Is Now The Key Driver Of Innovation," the "key to progress, particularly in times of economic crisis, is innovation." And winning in an economy of dwindling resources and punitive environmental regulation means creating green innovation.
Green innovation is already rampant in business. Eco-efficiency, supply chain transparency, green IT -- all lead to products, services and business models that can thrive in our new world.
Take away the green moniker and the innovations remain. In fact, progressive companies like Nike seldom trot out the G word -- they prefer to brand themselves performance and technology innovators.

Browse
Engage
Research









What a great article. I get
What a great article. I get odd looks when I suggest that companies should not be yelling about their charitable givings, but really - who among us as individuals sends out a mass email every time we donate to a charity? Why can't they just do the right thing? Same idea with environmentalism. The "myth of sustainablitiy" is an important one. Even FSC certified wood requires logging roads that, especially in Sumatra and other tropical areas, leaves wildlife populations vulnerable to poaching, and deprives the forest of important biomass and nutrients.
Why on earth should bike lanes and rail systems leave people incensed? We're just going back to a more practical way of life, which is charming and truly good for the ecosystem. In this economy, companies had better watch out. Consumers are mistrustful of pretty much everyone and are finding ways (swap meets, growing their own food, reclaiming wood, etc) to get stuff for free.
And sorry, but Branson is in the doghouse with Biologists and he has lost any credibility in "green" circles because of his lemur stunt.
http://emmiscafe.wordpress.com/2011/04/16/i-suppose-the-wealthy-are-immu...
Excellent post here, looking forward to reading more.
Terminology is always tricky,
Terminology is always tricky, words rarely mean only one thing. Innovation is not a synonym for sustainability, but it can embody environmental principles. It's a good thing if we're at a point where innovation implicitly conveys that something will be greener. But there are also a lot of personal or household moves toward sustainability that I don't think count as innovation, and which I'm sure Vancouver is aiming for too.