Last week I was interviewed for a Fox Small Business Center article, the topic of which was sustainability management practices for small business owners. As we got into the heart of our conversation, it struck me that the approach small business owners should use for sustainability management isn't dissimilar to the approach larger businesses use.
Indeed, my research into the practices of Global Fortune 500 companies revealed a common set of activities companies use to tie sustainability to the creation of business value.
I have had the privilege of interviewing over 100 sustainability, strategy, and finance managers at these companies for my forthcoming book, The Future of Value. These interviews suggest the trick to excellence in sustainability management is a commitment to continuously renew your company's approach. After all, the assumptions companies use to plan their sustainability strategies constantly change.
This much-needed commitment to continual improvement was underscored on July 10 when Australia's Prime Minister announced carbon emissions would be taxed at about US$25 per tonne starting next year.
The approach starts with an effort to craft a sustainability strategy and "ends" with an effort to renew the company's sustainability strategy. In between are steps to nurture a robust sustainability governance structure, execute the strategy, and analyze the results of your efforts. These five steps are the core of the CLEAR Model:
Craft; Lead; Embed; Analyze; Renew.

Craft Sustainability Strategy
Regardless of a company's size, a vision of what sustainability means to it is necessary to craft a plan to get there. My advice to companies small and large alike is to start with a clear definition of what "sustainability" means and then ask two follow-up questions:
1. Who are the stakeholders most impacted by my company and its operations (e.g., employees, local communities, etc.).
2. What does sustainability mean to these stakeholders?
Only with both sides of this puzzle can small business owners truly see the changes their operations require to become sustainable and effect positive change for their stakeholders.
Lead Strategy and Management Efforts
The best sustainability strategy left to its own devices won't be executed unless at least one person is given responsibility for carrying out this sustainability strategy as part of his or her day job. The most effective sustainability programs engage the entire enterprise at every level, including the Board. Sustainable Market Leaders understand the importance of leadership and governance. That is why they install robust governance structures to guide their sustainability efforts. The most effective structures consist of four components:
- Central sustainability team
- Cross-department committee(s)
- Stakeholder advisory panel
- Board level sustainability oversight
Embed Sustainability into Value Chain Activities
Execution is truly where the rubber meets the road for companies' sustainability efforts. Sustainability doesn't always require large, disruptive change. Nor does it require significant amounts of cash. Often execution requires taking tasks and activities companies already do to a new level of efficacy.

Browse
Engage
Research










I am looking for these
I am looking for these subjects. Thank you for this wonderful information. Keep sharing us helpful details!
Today, sustainability has
Today, sustainability has become a top priority for government, business and the general public. Thank you for this wonderful posts!
None of that is new
None of that is new technology, and these are standard options from both Boeing, Airbus, various aircraft interior refurbishers, corporate aircraft manufacturers, etc.
Genie Bra
We need to set a higher
We need to set a higher standard for sustainability. All I saw was bla bla BS-acronym bla bla bla... If this approach to sustainability works then why is the world continuing to fall apart? The fact is that much like full employment, zero inflation, & zero poverty, environmental sustainability is one of those things pretty much fundamentally ruled out by the mechanics of our limited supply currency based economics, and all we are doing here is ducking around plugging a handful of holes while the pressure behind the dam continues to mount.
If in your definition of sustainability it's ok for millions of people to remain in poverty, or to be 2nd class citizens in any way, then it's NOT sustainable.
For the system to be sustainable, it is not enough that some of it's parts (using a fairly low bar of attainment) can dub themselves with the title "sustainable". I really think we should be holding ourselves to a MUCH higher standard.
A new socio-economic paradigm is required, and that's one of the many things I've been working on.