"If you do just one thing -- make one conscious choice -- that can change the world, go organic.... No other single choice you can make to improve the health of your family and the planet will have greater positive repercussions for our future."
That's a bold statement. Is eating organic more important than avoiding meat, stopping coal plants, biking instead of driving or donating to worthy causes?
Yes, declares Maria Rodale, the CEO of the Rodale Inc. publishing empire (Mens Health, Prevention, Runners World) and author of the aptly named Organic Manifesto: How Organic Food Can Heal Our Planet, Feed the World and Keep Us Safe (Rodale Books), from which the quote is drawn.
"There's so many benefits that come from that one choice," Maria explains. "You've removed a bajillion pounds of dangerous, synthetic, disease-causing environment-destroying chemicals from the soil, the water our bodies. We would all immediately be healthier. Our children would be healthier."
Farmers and their families and farm workers would be better off, too, she goes on: "And our kids would be smarter. There are actually studies that show that a lot of these chemicals do reduce intelligence."
I arranged a phone interview with Maria after meeting her last spring during Cooking for Solutions, a great conference and food fest on sustainable agriculture and fishing organized by the Monterey Bay Aquarium. I'd read her book and wanted to delve deeper into the issues surrounding organics. Tomorrow, I'll offer a dissenting view from Steve Savage, an agricultural consultant who is dubious about many of Maria's claims.
Maria, who is 49, is the scion of America's first family of organics. Her grandfather, J.I. Rodale, started Organic Farming and Gardening magazine, which is now known as Organic Gardening, in 1942. He put his ideas into practice on a 60-acre farm near Emmaus, Pa. She was raised nearby. "I grew, I weeded, I picked, I cooked," she said. "I was very aware that we were a little different from everyone else, at least once I started going to school." The family farm became a tourist destination. "For many people, it was like a pilgrimage," she remembers. Those were the days when organic food could be purchased only in health or natural food stores.
Today, while the acreage farmed organically remains small -- less than 1 percent of U.S. farmland -- organics are a big business. U.S. sales of organic food and beverages have grown from $1 billion in 1990 to $26.7 billion in 2010, according to the Organic Trade Association. Organic fruits and vegetables represent more than 10 percent of all sales of fruits and vegetable, the group says.
Conventional foods are worse for us than we realize, Maria argues. The government responds to problems after the fact and is overly influenced by big agricultural firms, which also shape university research. In her book, she writes:
There is enough evidence to know now that synthetic chemicals are destroying our health and our ability to reproduce and, thus, our ability to survive as a species. Agricultural chemicals have statistically and significantly been implicated in causing all sorts of cancers, behavioral problems, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, autism, Parkinson's disease, reduced intelligence, infertility, miscarriage, diabetes, infant deformities and low birth weight.
No specific studies are cited in the book, so I asked Maria for a couple of references. She sent me a link to Beyond Pesticides, website, where a blog with headlines like Low Doses of Pesticides Put Honey Bees at Risk. Mount Sinai Medical Center in New York provides a fact-sheet about pesticides here which says, among other things, that
Pesticides have been shown to cause a wide range of adverse effects on human health including acute and chronic injury to the nervous system, lung damage, injury to the reproductive organs, dysfunction of the immune and endocrine systems, birth defects, and cancer; these effects can manifest as acutely toxic effects, delayed effects, or chronic effects.
For its part, the agricultural industry says pesticide residues on food are harmless and regulated by the government.

Browse
Engage
Research










It would appear the movement
It would appear the movement to organic is 'on' and as such, needs to be dealt with swiftly and harshly. Through the efforts of Monsanto, et.al., entities who would receive a negative economic impact with the propagation of such ideas, our Congressmen have been purchased through lobbyists and have floated a trial balloon piece of rancid legislation aimed at making home gardening illegal. Yes, you read that right. http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h875/text This is the opening salvo toward complete gov't control of what the citizens are permitted to consume. Likely anyone who still has a home garden will be subject to inspection, fines, threats and all the normal intimidation borne of this new American tyranny. I'm thrilled that "it's a free country" otherwise we'd really be in trouble.
Is it possible to sustain 6
Is it possible to sustain 6 Billion + people using organic methods?
yes..the data and
yes..the data and demonstration sites are already out there... all around the world.. especially in the parts of the world not fully contolled by american business..
Yes it is possible, we can
Yes it is possible, we can use powdered rocks and seaweeds also wastes from animals very cheap and so healthy. Actually they are not recycling all those, and only pushing for carbon taxes....But carbon is good for plants, imagine long before carbon in air was as much as 30% now it is 0.4....Dinosaurs haD to feed on huge amount of matter, I can see HUGE forests...Huge amount of carbon released by diplodocus ;)
So many people not working, why not create centers where kids from poor area can learn about countryside and nature, invite Beyonce to give price for best cheaply made organic food.... They can make Xplant factor.
Instead we have kids totally into gangsters, whore RAP :(
Imagine they say too many people, in fact we need every one to refertilise land. If we don't we will grow weak and poor because so dependant on chemicals to heal damage, but eventually water and land will be totally wasted...And by association so will we.
YET MORE BENEFITS TO
YET MORE BENEFITS TO ORGANICS
This interview w/Maria only begins to scratch the surface of the benefits of organic farming. We at Equal Exchange know a little bit about this as we've been importing - and working directly with - organic coffee farmers for more than 20 years and currently work with organic tea, cacao, sugar, banana and almond farmers, too, all around the world.
Here are just two more benefits:
1 - risk management for farmers, and for society. Organic farms have much healthier soil that absorbs water better, and is less prone to erosion, during heavy rains (which is increasing in frequency and severity due to climate change). This soil also is much better at retaining moisture for long periods during dry spells (which are also increasing in frequency and severity due to climate change). Hence organic farms consistently out-perform chemically-dependent farms when rainfall drops.
These and other "resilience" characteristics mean organic farmers are minimizing their risk exposure. By extension by expanding organic farming society can help minimize our collective risks to wild swings (especially downward) in food production.
2 – Organic farming sequesters carbon, potentially lots of it. Chemical farming adds carbon to the atmosphere, often lots of it. So regardless of your position on humanity’s role in climate change, it is irrefutable that there is too much carbon in the air, and that it’s a good thing to adopt practices that put that carbon back in the soil.
One can see just some examples of the many studies on these benefits at http://www.fao.org/docs/eims/upload/275960/al185e.pdf
&
http://www.organiccenter.org/science.environment.php
&
http://www.rodaleinstitute.org/global_warming
+1 for the benefits of
+1 for the benefits of organics but the 'climate change' references are simply wrong.
CO2 in the atmosphere benefits plant growth as is readily demonstrated by foods grown in greenhouses with added CO2 and increasing growth rates particularly of forests in the last few decades.
We should be concerned about chemicals and GMOs being distributed in the environment (including toxins from energy production) but CO2 is comparatively simple to remove from the atmosphere should there ever be the need, simply grow fast growing plants (elephant grass, hemp), harvest and bury.
Promoting raw friendly foods saves energy too, the energy used in cooking and other preparation. Too many varieties selected for tough skins to withstand rough mechanical handling and transportation and so less able to be eaten raw are now prevalent.
Let's subsidize local,
Let's subsidize local, sustainable farming at first, just so they can compete with Big AG and then pull all subsidies and let the market decide. Maybe though, an administrative nightmare to subsidize millions of small farms.
We dont need subsidizes if
We dont need subsidizes if real people all got together and pooled resources. Lets leave the crooked government out of it, because you know they only look for corporate profits not your well being.
I couldn't agree more with
I couldn't agree more with the article. This is why we are very excited about an amazing company called Beyond Organic. Beginning this November, they will ship some amazing products from their farm to your front door. Check out our website and let us know if this is something you may be interested in.
To Your Health!