In the midst of the madness of black Friday, and this weekend of American consumerism run amok, come a few wise words from the outdoor retailer Patagonia.
In a full-page ad in the New York Times, the privately held company asks shoppers to think more carefully about what they purchase, and the real cost of all the things we buy.
The headline: Don't Buy This Jacket
"We ask you to buy less and to reflect before you spend a dime on this jacket or anything else," the company says.
The rest of the ad is worth reading, and thinking about, so I'll copy the text here:
It's Black Friday, the day in the year retail turns from red to black and starts to make real money. But Black Friday, and the culture of consumption it reflects, puts the economy of natural systems that support all life firmly in the red. We're now using the resources of one-and-a-half planets on our one and only planet.
Because Patagonia wants to be in business for a good long time -- and leave a world inhabitable for our kids -- we want to do the opposite of every other business today. We ask you to buy less and to reflect before you spend a dime on this jacket or anything else.
Environmental bankruptcy, as with corporate bankruptcy, can happen very slowly, then all of a sudden. This is what we face unless we slow down, then reverse the damage. We're running short on fresh water, topsoil, fisheries, wetlands -- all our planet's natural systems and resources that support business, and life, including our own.
The environmental cost of everything we make is astonishing. Consider the R2 Jacket shown, one of our best sellers. To make it required 135 liters of water, enough to meet the daily needs (three glasses a day) of 45 people. Its journey from its origin as 60 percent recycled polyester to our Reno warehouse generated nearly 20 pounds of carbon dioxide, 24 times the weight of the finished product. This jacket left behind, on its way to Reno, two-thirds its weight in waste.
And this is a 60 percent recycled polyester jacket, knit and sewn to a high standard; it is exceptionally durable, so you won't have to replace it as often. And when it comes to the end of its useful life we'll take it back to recycle into a product of equal value. But, as is true of all the things we can make and you can buy, this jacket comes with an environmental cost higher than its price.
There is much to be done and plenty for us all to do. Don't buy what you don't need. Think twice before you buy anything. Go to patagonia.com/CommonThreads or scan the QR code below. Take the Common Threads Initiative pledge, and join us in the fifth "R," to reimagine a world where we take only what nature can replace.
That's good environmental messaging. But is it good business for a company to urge people to buy less? Moreover, is there a disconnect between this ad and Patagonia's own plans for grow, open new stores and mail out more catalogs?
Patagonia responds in a blogpost about the ad:
The test of our sincerity (or our hypocrisy) will be if everything we sell is useful, multifunctional where possible, long-lasting, beautiful but not in thrall to fashion. We're not yet entirely there. Not every product meets all these criteria. Our Common Threads Initiative will serve as a framework to advance us toward these goals.
Patagonia, to its credit, is pushing us (and its own people) to think about what sustainable consumption might look like.













I saw the ad in the NY Times,
I saw the ad in the NY Times, doesn't seem a paper likely read by those who go shopping @ 10 p.m. on Thanksgiving.
You've got to be kidding me.
You've got to be kidding me. This is a clever advertisement for the company. The ad directs you to a link where you can sign a pledge, a pledge sponsored by the company? True, they may be concerned about sustainability, more so than other companies, but it's an ad for their products nonetheless. Don't talk about fight club Mr. Gunther.
I live in Argentina, and I
I live in Argentina, and I just found out that there is a company called Patagonia which sells junk to eco nerds using the name of our land in vain ... the ad is crap, to actually sell more ... consume, obey, marry and replicate ...**
Vivo en Argentina, y me acabo de enterar que hay una empresa que se llama Patagonia que vende porquerias a eco nerds usando el nombre de nuestra tierra en vano... el anuncio es una mierda, para en realidad vender mas ... consuma, obedezca, casate y reproducete...
Are you aware that on of the
Are you aware that on of the heads of the Patagonia company is Kris Tompkins, who is working diligently to re-invest all of the money she made over the years into wildlife rehabilitation projects in Argentinean and Chilean Patagonia? She and her husband Doug Tompkins have successfully restored more land than any other humans on the planet. After investing incredible amounts of time and energy into rehabilitation of the land and what lives there, they have turned the possession of the land back the Chilean government, who has promised to keep is as a National Park (Pumalin Park).
Originally, Patagonia, Doug Tompkins' North Face company, and others worked without a great eco-centric view of their companies the their impacts, but this couple has done incredibly selfless work throughout Patagonia to help prevent damage and restore impacted land. Yvonne Chouinard, founder of Patagonia, has a great SeventhGeneration youtube video available that chronicles the change of his thinking from capitalism to ecocentrism (google it!) It is hard to trust foreigners who come into a country to buy up land for any reason, but having worked on the Future Patagonia National Park program and getting to know this duo well, I changed my view of them and believe 100% in their mission. Sure, the Patagonia ad might not have been 100% selfless, but it's at least a step in the right direction. Let's hope others follow suit!
I live in Argentina, close to
I live in Argentina, close to the real Patagonia. This crappy company does not even have a representative here. Im pretty outraged at them using the name of our soil to sell their crappy products to eco-nerds...
Argentino, why do you keep
Argentino,
why do you keep using harsh words vs. Patagonia? It is one of the most environmental and social companies on the planet, and they don't make crappy products. They make products that last, and take them back at the end of their long life. As some other people have mentioned here, they also do a lot to restore nature in Patagonia, an area of South America where they have not done any harm. Therefore I would ask that you stop repeating your unfriendly style here. Patagonia deserves praise, not scorn. BTW, I do not work for Patagonia.
Employees from Patagonia, the
Employees from Patagonia, the company, have over time removed hundreds of miles of range land barbed wire fencing from Patagonia, the region, so as to restore the free movement of endangered animals. Further, they donate 1% of their earnings, from "selling all of their crappy products", that oddly enough have a lifetime guarantee, to environmental groups around the world. If you read up on the company you'd probably understand why they don't have a brick and morter presence in the region.
Unfortunately, not too many
Unfortunately, not too many of us took their advice. I think this year's Black Friday sales were actually increased from last year. The violence also increased.