It's a challenge for every company with a software "solution" for sale: it's a solution, but for what? Are customers looking for an all-encompassing solution to a big problem, or a targeted solution for a small problem? Do they want an interconnected suite of software modules, with a common data model, common look-and-feel, and discounted price tag, or a small-bore program that will automate a currently-manual process?
For the suppliers of enterprise carbon and energy management (ECEM) software, this age-old problem is especially challenging since the range of potential functionality is so broad, and the array of potential stakeholders, influencers, and buyers is so wide.
Consider the "word cloud" depicted in Figure 1 below, which shows a subset of the labels for such software.

And in parallel, the motivations of potential buyers of ECEM shown in Figure 2 below (and click here for a larger version):
Since most companies do not face cut-and-dried regulatory requirements for emissions reporting, matching up the motivations of the buyers with the functional scope of the product sellers is a time-consuming exercise of workshops, pre-sales consulting, assessments, and, inevitably, drilling a lot of dry holes.
So with everything available for ECEM -- from full-blown suites of software products from the likes of SAP, Oracle, or IBM, to free web-based carbon accounting tools -- how can the vendors best position themselves to prosper in this nascent market? Following the pattern of other enterprise software markets, we think ECEM adoption will play out in one of several variations of the "land and expand" strategy.
• For the big vendors, they have already "landed." IBM's Maximo asset management software has thousands of customers, likewise its Tivoli data center management software. Expanding and interconnecting these product footprints, and their user constituents, is the central opportunity for IBM and its brethren like SAP and Oracle.
• Similarly, the EH&S software companies like Enablon have "landed" too. They have deep connections with customers, albeit generally a narrower set of them and a specialized user constituency within those customers. And therefore a bigger challenge to expand beyond the heavy-emitter industries and EH&S managers that make up the bulk of their customer base.
• For the startups, the opportunity is finding a place to land. And while much of their focus is on energy management and the concrete, cost-reduction ROI that it can deliver, I continue to get more inquiries from Forrester clients about carbon accounting. A big hospitality company looking to get off of Excel. A European food company looking to support its integrated report strategy. A giant manufacturer looking to simplify its CDP reporting. These kind of narrow-gauge requirements are the starting point for companies with well-crafted point products.
And for all the vendors, agility is paramount. They must be able to helicopter up & down, from enterprise suite to point product, as customer requirements evolve.
SAP has developed "quick start" programs that address specific use cases of prospective customers, bundling content, services, and software. And they are powering a software reporting package offered by the CDP to its members.
Meanwhile, startups like C3 showcase their comprehensive vision and product architecture, while selling products targeted at specific customer challenges and offering near-term payback on software investment.
What's your ECEM requirement set? And who are the buyers and influencers of the decision within your organization? Please weigh in below…
Software photo via Shutterstock.


Browse
Engage
Research











Chris, Great article. I would
Chris,
Great article. I would add one more Motivator which is Employee Engagement and the related Organizational Stakeholders which in this case are all the employees within an organization.
In our experience deploying sustainability data management solutions within our own firm and those of our clients, we have witnessed many sustainability initiatives fall short because of a lack of employee awareness, understanding, and most importantly engagement. As a result, many internal "Green Teams" struggle with how to increase the breadth and depth of employee engagement in the organization's established sustainability initiatives.
To address this challenge, we have chosen to deploy a combined cloud based solution (Sustainability Data Suite from CloudApps) along with their SuMo (Sustainability Momentum) Employee Engagement app in the form of a widget on the desktop of every employee. The simple widget syncs to relevant data in the cloud so that employees remain aware of their personal and the organization's performance vs. established goals and engages their participation via the power of "crowdvoting" where they can suggest ideas as well as promote/demote other ideas posted by their peers. A process which is welcomed and feels very comfortable to Millennial generation employees.
Chris, Thanks for the
Chris,
Thanks for the insights. This is interesting stuff. I work for Locus Technologies and we sell a cloud based platform for managing EHS and Sustainability data and operations for both large Fortune clients as well as individual facilities. I would say we fall in the Second Landed category.
I agree with most of what you are saying and it is pretty much inline with what I am seeing as well.
I think one aspect you maybe overlooking is a general market confusion/unclear direction in relation to future standards, global requirements, and various regulatory programs. I believe that many companies are putting ducks in a row to prepare for better EHS management, but at the same time are waiting to see how the political climate plays out as well as how things like the GRI and other global standards play out.
If these last few months are any indication, it should be a fun and interesting year.
Post new comment