Sure, solar power is greener than electricity from fossil fuel, but that doesn't guarantee that all solar panels are made sustainably. For corporations buying or investing in solar panels for their environmental benefits, it makes sense to keep track of the sustainability leaders -- and to be wary of the potential risks of associating with manufacturers with less sustainable practices.
The good news, though, is that many solar manufacturers are highly aware of the issue, according to a new report from San Francisco-based nonprofit As You Sow. The group, which advocates for environmental and social corporate responsibility, supports solar energy and put out the report – titled Clean & Green: Best Practices in Photovoltaics -- as a guide for investors, consumers and others.
“I was really pleased to see how much awareness there was,” said Amy Galland, the report’s author, adding that solar companies likely want to avoid the criticisms about sustainability that other industries have faced.
Because the solar industry is built on the concept of protecting the environment, it can face extra scrutiny in cases where it fails to do so.
Many in the industry already recognize this: Last fall at JinkoSolar in China, where demonstrations over a polluted river sometimes turned violent, the company quickly took action to address the problem, Galland said.
And this month, the Solar Energy Industries Association made its first official solar industry commitment to environmental and social responsibility via a document promoting industry standards in those areas. The founding companies in that include Dow Solar, SunPower, Suntech, Trina Solar, and Yingli Solar.
“You’re seeing an industry that’s really responsive,” Galland said.
However, it still has room for improvement. Only 11 companies responded to the more than 100 surveys that As You Sow sent out, for example. “We do hope the rest of the industry becomes more transparent and thinking about it,” Galland said.
Many of the respondents were industry leaders that could provide good examples for others to follow, she added. For instance, the responding companies beat emissions standards, have started their own initiatives to reduce their water use and are participating in voluntary worker safety programs, she said.
The report notes the inherent benefits of solar panels over fossil fuels, such as the fact that solar is renewable and that panels are safer for workers to produce than fossil-fuel equipment. But it also discusses some challenges, including the toxic substances used to make solar panels, as well as problems with some companies and suppliers failing to comply with health and safety codes.
From deciding where to make solar panels to planning for the end of their usefulness, the report highlights how capturing the renewable energy can be more environmentally friendly.
Buyers might consider the manufacturing location, for example. Depending on where they are, solar factories use electricity from different types of fuels to make the panels – and, therefore, have widely varying carbon footprints. In China, 81 percent of electricity comes from conventional thermal sources, while 45 percent of U.S. electricity comes from coal.
The end-of-life aspects also play a role in determining panels' sustainability. First Solar, for example, has a prefunded collection and recycling program that stands out in the industry, with up to 95 percent of the old panels' semiconductor material reusable for new panels, the report notes.
Other recommendations from the report include management practices, such as board independence and transparency, as well as tying executive compensation to environmental health and safety.
For more information about the report, visit http://www.asyousow.org.
Photo by Kletr via Shutterstock.
I think anything that makes
I think anything that makes sustainable energy, or makes it more sustainable is worthwhile. Switching to solar energy is the only real solution with the way our current resources are being quickly depleted and polluting our environment. Solar systems create clean, natural energy with absolutely no pollution. It can provide heat, lighting, mechanical power and electricity. I got an amazing lead on this topic when I found Greenlogic.com. They have some useful information regarding their costs and savings before and after tax incentives and credits and utility rebates. These tax breaks alone can make it easier for you to afford a system. They had information on green energy solutions that really helped me come up with a useful strategy. I knew the initial cost of my solar system and the expected lifetime savings. It made the decision quick and easy. I would definitely recommend taking a look.
The question of "how green is
The question of "how green is solar" includes not only the fact that nothing is burned, which we interpret to mean "green" since by that fact we "appear to be" addressing the global climate change imperative, reducing some GHG's.
But that's not the whole picture. In addition to manufacture, which as Eric points out has been anything but green, the question of deployment looms large in any meaning full carbon assessment. Large utility scale solar proposed for Southwest Deserts according to DOI PEIS and other policies destroy old growth desert ecosystems which sink carbon. Transport of panels from Guangdong by ship, rail and truck adds to the carbon load. And removal of those panels after a period of 25 years utility increases carbon loading as well. These cradle to grave impacts and attempts at carbon neutrality have not been quantified by the BLM, the DOI or project applicants. In addition remotely sited utility model assumes the need for transmission lines. Again factor the transport GHG impact from all that Chinese steel now being erected for Sunrise Powerlink, also unquantified.
Large Utility solar facilities are wasteful, costly and destructive. Distributed solar is the only way to address California and the Southwest's presumed energy needs and Climate Change politics. The real answer is however hidden behind industry lies and manipulation, as the only way to meet climate goals is to not use the power (Lovins, Negawatts). The fact that public utilities do not have an adequate business model for distributed solar on rooftops and already distressed lands, should not be the reason ratepayers' energy costs skyrocket, America's energy infrastructure becomes more vulnerable not less, and climate goals are not met. That's why some people call this ENRON 2.
I will also post below a letter from CRIT Colorado River Indian tribes Chairperson Eldred Enas to President Barack Obama regarding the destruction of Native American culture and lifeways as a result of the proposed "build-out" of utility scale "large solar."
Most 'sustainable' solar
Most 'sustainable' solar project for homeowners? A Climax tank installed as a hot water preheater on the roof, combined with hot water pipe lagging and a reduced size heavily insulated main water tank inside. It's a steel tank painted black and put in a glass-front insulated box. Other tech involves toxic components; ARKLA air chillers use lithium bromide salts solutions in the 'generator' and 'absorber' sections while PV cells use arsenic, gallium, lead, and other select semiconductive metallic materials in their crystals.