

OAKLAND, Calif. -- Despite being a centerpiece of celebrations the world over, fireworks displays often release toxic chemicals into the environment; researchers are developing a new generation of fireworks that shine as bright but leave less of an impact.

ELMSFORD, N.Y. -- Coca Cola signed a 10-year contract with UTC Power that will bring two fuel cells to a southern New York bottling plant, where they will produce enough heat and energy to satisfy nearly a third of the facility's needs. The state of New York also provided $2 million for the project.

GENEVA, -- Efforts by the world's leading cement companies knocked down carbon dioxide emissions from the industry’s manufacturing process by 35 percent even while production climbed by 53 percent, according to a new report by the World Business Council for Sustainable Development’s Cement Sustainability Initiative.
[Editor's note: In this exclusive excerpt from Joel Makower's new book, "Strategies for the Green Economy, we look at the easy steps to tell your company's green story. You can read a previous excerpt here.]
How do you create a green strategy that is pitch perfect and tuned for long-term success? It's not easy, based on the efforts I've seen. Companies executives -- and their advertising, marketing, and public relations partners -- are prone to make broad, sweeping statements about their environmental commitment or the green attributes of their products or services, statements and claims that often pose more questions than answers.
In other cases, companies simply seem uninspired. (How many more times can we stand yet another takeoff on Kermit the Frog's plaintive proclamation, "It's not easy being green." Kermit first crooned that song lyric in -- Would you believe? -- 1970, and nearly four decades later it still seems to be the best copywriters can come up with. (In mid-2008, I conducted a Google search of the phrase "easy being green," which yielded 1,570,000 returns. By contrast "til death do we part" yielded only 17,500 returns, while "check is in the mail" garnered 20,500 returns.) Moreover, each new slogan or press release quoting or paraphrasing Kermit seems to revel in its cleverness, as if its creators were the first to have thought it up.) Is it any wonder that the public is skeptical about companies' environmental commitments?
It's not just Kermit, of course. Too many green strategies, and the messages behind them, are variously vague, vapid, or vacuous.
How do you avoid this fate? To answer this, I turned to my colleague Andrew Shapiro, founder and CEO of GreenOrder, the sustainable business strategy firm with which I am affiliated. I've learned a lot hanging around Shapiro, managing principal Nicholas Eisenberger and their team for the better part of a decade, but what sticks most is GreenOrder's framework for crafting green strategies and messaging that work. It's called CRED.
GreenOrder -- whose blue-chip clients have included Allianz, BP, DuPont, General Electric, General Motors, Office Depot, and Pfizer -- isn't the first consulting firm to come up with a multipart strategy acronym. Over the years, as I've encountered or worked with some of the leading consulting, PR, and marketing firms, I've seen my share. They all have value.
CRED evolved from GreenOrder's experience working on C-suite executive strategy and implementation, including creating the metrics companies must use to measure success and make their environmental initiatives thoughtful, effective, and believable. After all, it's no use having a green strategy and message if they don't work or if they don't drive value and fit with a larger vision -- the story the company would like to tell about itself, both today and over the longer term. And telling a green story that isn't rooted in real-world accomplishments amounts to little more than arm waving.
This is only part of the problem. An equally vexing challenge is how to stand out in the crowd, to be heard amid the growing cacophony of green messages. Therein lies the green-strategy paradox: As green becomes increasingly mainstream, it gets harder to be heard. The louder the noise, the more people tune out. And the more companies boast, the greater is the risk of backlash.
GreenOrder's CRED strategy is aimed at mitigating this risk. It is comprised of four key parts: Credibility, Relevance, Effective messaging, and Differentiation. Let's take a look at each.
CREDIBILITY
Why should people believe you? To be effective, your strategy and messages need to be convincing. This means that they must be backed by facts and figures. This is not to say that everything you say on the topic needs to be laden with dense data. Far from it. But you need a solid foundation of proof points, if only to have in your back pocket.
Credibility also begs larger questions. Does your company's performance match its green rhetoric? Can you prove it? How does your company or its products compare, whether with competitors' best products, the installed product base, what the government requires, or even the historical performance of past generations of the same product? You'll be credible if you can show that you've done your homework. It needn't appear in ads, product labeling, or point-ofpurchase information, but it should be available somewhere, whether on product fact sheets, Web sites, customer service lines, or some other place. "GE has done that well with ecomagination," says Shapiro. "They've had very detailed information about the environmental and operating performance of ecomagination products on a dedicated Web site, even though the advertisements on television, for example, haven't overwhelmed consumers with factoids."
The volume and nature of data may depend in part on your sector, as well as on how well your company is regarded from an environmental perspective. An eco-hip and well-regarded brand such as Patagonia, the maker of outdoor apparel, or Method, which makes cleaning products, may have a lower burden of proof than a company that lacks a green image or history. (Then again, maybe not. Informed, eco-conscious customers such as Patagonia's and Method's can be among the toughest audiences in the world in terms of questioning and challenging green claims.) Business and institutional buyers likely will have much deeper information needs and may not spend a lot of time hunting it down. Also, you may want to dial up or down the amount of information to reflect the importance you're placing on a product's green attributes and how aggressively you want to promote them. Sometimes, less is more.
The role of marketing in promoting sustainable lifestyles
Brilliant to see the role of marketing being addressed here, both in terms of 1. its potential to drive a business beyond cost savings (once you've made a committment to customers you have to keep going) and 2. where marketers are actually making matters worse, through ineffective advertising that doesn't stand out and can actually confuse the customer making it more difficult for all of us!
These insights are the foundation of our communications consultancy business. We offer workshops for those advertising agencies brave enough to admit they aren't doing sustainability well yet. Clients looking for practical advice might want to take a look at our content rich website which covers topics ranging from targeting through to developing messaging strategies and forming the business case www.hiveideas.co.uk.
We're looking to convene a conference of marketers to encourage them to see the role they can (profitably) play in encouraging people to live more sustainable lifestyles. Get in touch if you're interested in being part of it berryd@hiveideas.co.uk.
The road to sustainable marketing
Great article Joel. The steps for using your green efforts to enhance a brand are well defined. I've already reprinted (with attribution of course) over on my blog.
My personal exploration now is less about steps like thes and more about how the tools of marketing can be used to create a sustainable economy. The distinctions I'm drawing (just wrote a blog post about it, and working on a video) are:
- Marketing Sustainability: selling green products and concepts
- Marketing with Sustainability: using your green efforts to enhance your brand
- Sustainable Marketing: utilizing marketing tools (product, price, placement & promotion) to help build a sustainable economy (people, planet, profit)
More at:
http://bobcanhelp.com/
Are You Serious?
Are you serious? Crediblity? How credible is it that this site's charter sponsor and major advertiser is General Motors. Besides spending quite a bit of money telling people they are going green by sponsoring green events, web pages and advertising , what exactly has GM done? Have you seen the new Hummer ads?Almost every company listed in your article is on the most recent PERI Toxic 100 list which uses EPA data, including Dupont at #1. Here are the rest:
6-General Electric
18-General Motors
29-BP
59-PFizer
What service are we truly providing these companies when it comes to actual environmental issues versus just "feel good" attempts to try to persuade consumers that something is being done?
Credibility Is Key
As a communications consultant, I think Joel is absolutely right to put so much emphasis on credibility. It's essential to successful communications on any topic, but especially green/sustainable products, services, and initiatives. With so much greenwashing out there, there's a huge wall of skepticism to overcome -- witness the "Are You Serious?" comment.
Personally, I have a great deal of ambivalence about many large corporations' sustainability communications. Significant efforts to reduce environmental impact and increase social benefits should be encouraged and applauded, but can you really claim to be aiming for sustainability if your fundamental business model is unsustainable?
Green marketing + REAL vision make a difference to consumers
In my observation, the companies that benefit the most from Green marketing are those who really leapfrog the previous common wisdom about what is actually possible and make giant strides based on systemic rethinking (a la Amory Lovins), as well as the small incremental improvements like green lightbulbs and compostable plasticware that lots of other people are doing.
This includes a lot of companies who have for decades been far from the cutting edge, but are feeling economic and consumer pressure to be more viably green. I think that's a good trend, as long as the progress is real and not just for show
Shel Horowitz, award-winning author of Principled Profit: Marketing That Puts People First and founder of the Business Ethics Pledge, http://www.business-ethics-pledge.org
Sustainability Is a Processes Not a Switch
"Credibility is Key" hit the nail on the head with the question, "...can you really claim to be aiming for sustainability if your fundamental business model is unsustainable?"
The simple answer is 'of course not.' Green-washing is ever present with companies like Clorox producing 'Green" options but not changing the formulas to their traditional brands. As mentioned in an earlier post, GM and DuPoint are on top toxicity lists.
But, what we have to realize is that sustainability is a process. It's the process of breaking out of old habits and adapting brand new methods that are completely opposite from our routines. For large corporations this means either a). waiting for a more cost effective way to do business b). becoming a pioneer and taking the initial loss for the long-term ROI.
This is not an easy choice at all. While they are thinking about A or B, the corporations' "greenwashed" contributions to sustainability actually makes the complicated answer YES. Let's face it, we have come to depend on corporate brands in a 'stamp of approval' way. If these companies are now Greening their habits-even if it's faux Green, they are sending a very large message to the non-greened general population that sustainability is the right way to go.
--LadyPink
more at http://www.thepinkstandard.com
Are You Serious Continued
I think it is going to be extremely difficult to convince the masses to take sustainability seriously when the so-called "experts" and the media are willing to take money from companies that are the biggest polluters. The small changes these companies are making are so incredibly minute compared to the damage they caused and continue to cause. However, they have the marketing/pr machines and most importantly -- the money -- to try to convince people they are doing something good. Money that Greenbiz.com, GreenOrder, CNN, Planet Green, NBC/Universal, Time, The Sundance Channel and many others are all glad to take.
Effective messaging & differentiation
Most of the comments have focused on credibility. In a recent survey 76% of consumers could not name one green company. That is why I believe that the last two factors in your CRED framework are at least as important. Like it or not, most people don't put a lot of thought into evaluating marketing and PR messages. Green marketing is no different...this is not about advocacy, it is about persuasion.
Marketing Guy
Post new comment