But the silver lining in both of these reports -- one from the Economist Intelligence Unit, and another from Cisco -- is that both despite and because of the gloomy economy, companies of all types see the importance and benefits of taking on green practices at work.
In the Economist study, timed to the launch of its 2009 Sustainability Summit, nearly three-quarters of the executives surveyed said that energy efficiency will be a high or moderate priority in the next two years as a way of cutting costs. The study also found that 67 percent of respondents believed that climate change will become a lower priority to companies as they try to weather the economic climate. The report also found that just over half -- 54 percent -- of companies have a "coherent" climate policy in place.
"The Copenhagen conference in December will be a crucial time for climate-change negotiations. But set against a backdrop of significant economic stress, a key question will be to what degree concerns about the economy will weaken any possible progress,” Robin Bew, Editorial Director of the Economist Intelligence Unit, said about the report. "This report shows that, although businesses will necessarily switch focus to survival mode, many firms are starting to embrace some of the short-term cost benefits of energy efficiency. A significant minority are also discovering longer-term business opportunities relating to climate change."
In a survey conducted by Zogby International on behalf of Cisco, 55 percent -- almost the same number of respondents as in the Economist survey -- say their firms have developed a green strategy. But the survey, which focused on information technology's role in improving the efficiency of a company's operations, found that executives are increasingly aware of the power of IT to make not just data centers and workstations more efficient, but also to help monitor, track and reduce energy use across operations.
In looking at budgets for IT purchases in the coming months, 54 percent of executives said that they're much more likely to buy technological solutions to help with their overall green strategies, and over two-thirds said they'd also consider adopting technologies to manage energy consumption within buildings.
"This survey demonstrates that U.S. business leaders see technology as a viable tool for addressing cost and environmental concerns, especially as they try to maximize their IT investments," said Laura Ipsen, a Senior Vice President at Cisco and the co-chair of the company's EcoBoard. "Cisco believes that information technology has the power to transform how the world manages its energy and environmental issues in everything from the data center, to the enterprise, all the way to the Connected Home."
These new studies come on the heels of an announcement earlier this week by a Canadian researcher, who found that, despite rising awareness of IT's potential to help achieve environmental goals, the electronics industry still has a long way to go before balancing the scales between environmental benefits and environmental impacts.


Browse
Engage
Research









save money, tell others how, and win money
Video competition - win cool prizes and cold hard cash
www.powerdownfortheplanet.org
Many people don't think to turn off their computers after using them. Given that most personal computers waste half of the energy delivered from the wall, leaving your computer on wastes money, wastes energy, and generates excess heat. So pick up a camera and make a video telling your own story of energy efficiency and IT waste.
Join us, gather some friends, and broadcast your vision of efficient computing. The team with the most compelling video can win up to $5,000 and energy efficient laptops; students at participating universities are also eligible to win $5,000 and Specialized Globe bicycles.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jABb8L89G44
Green pays off in another way...
I read the previous comment with interest, as here at Columbia we have installed our low-power consuming SiCortex in what is essentially a closet. No need to battle for space in a data center, or to supercool our office. We just need to remember not to close the closet door.
IT can achieve more, and consume less.
I agree with the statement that “the electronics industry still has a long way to go before balancing the scales between environmental benefits and environmental impacts.” One such example is how the computing industry designs large-scale cluster systems for data centers. First, to size the problem, a number of published sources state that data centers in the US consume between 4% and 6% of the electricity produced in the country, and is projected to continue to increase. Yes, some of this computing is applied to research projects that could ultimately save energy. But the majority of these systems are constructed by clustering thousands of inefficient commodity processors. These processors, designed for desktop systems, include wasteful functionality that is not used for high performance computing but nevertheless consume energy for both ‘computation’ and cooling.
There is another way. There are companies, like SiCortex, that have designed high performance computers from the processor upward that use as little as 20% of the energy consumed by conventional clustered systems to deliver the same throughput. These systems run the same operating environments as the hot-burning systems without contributing to global warming or exacerbating our energy problem. Yes, a different approach, and as Einstein once said, We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them.”
All IT is Green IT
This article loses sight of the fact that IT has probably done more to streamline the operations of companies in the last two decades than any other invention or practice. IT has allowed companies to produce less, hold less inventory, and ship goods in process and finished products in a more efficient way.
So even though we begrudge IT for the electricity is uses, the heat it generates, and the room it takes up on our desktops, we can't deny that IT is probably THE greenest technology to emerge so far.
Sure, IT can do a better job of producing electronics that run more efficiently - and those activities and purchasing decisions are well underway.
I just don't like the tone that there is a difference between "IT" and "Green IT". All IT is green IT. Just some IT could become greener.