The toilet, developed by London-based Phoenix Product Development, features a sealable lid that enables a displaced air-flushing system.
This requires just 1.35 liters of water per flush, compared to the 9.2 liters used by conventional toilets. The system could potentially save the UK 1.85 billion liters of water each day.
Garry Moore, managing director at the company, said the system had been successfully trialed by Greenwich Council and the WRc.
The company has already secured a number of customers and now needs £3 million to fund the commercial roll out of the technology, after a previous backer pulled out due to the financial crisis.
"Greenwich has said it wants to install more of the systems after the trial and we have another trial lined up in Australia," Moore said. "But we can't scale up and begin manufacture without funding."
He said banks were unwilling to provide finance given the current economic climate, while many government investment funds tended to focus on low-carbon technologies, rather than water-saving ones.
Moore added that the system could easily be retrofitted to existing toilets and promised to deliver carbon as well as water savings.
"Three million tonnes of carbon emissions each year come from the water companies, and 12 percent of the water they supply is used by households to flush toilets," he said. "It works out as three grams of CO2 per flush, so saving water also delivers significant carbon savings."
Image courtesy of Propelair Ltd.


Browse
Engage
Research










Lack or Water to keep things Moving
As a civil Engineer agree with the previous comment. I certainly support any endeavour to save our precious water resources. However basic hydraulics cannot be ignored. Achieving self cleansing velocities are a very necessary part keeping wastewater on the move. Talk to any doctor, if your own body gets dehydrated it will struggle to pass your waste through and even cause things to block up. A sewerage system is no different.
The old 25ltr cisterns were overkill, but the modern 4-6 ltr toilets seems to keep the solids moving well. I share the same concern that reducing the volume of water any further will stop the solids flowing all together!! If this technology is to be investigated seriously, consideration towards "continuing to move the solids" needs to be given. Maybe using these in multi story units, or incorporating storage and then flushing out slightly larger volumes in one go??
Who's POO
Yeah Great. I suppose it will be up to the wastewater authority to add water back into the sewerage line to get it all moving again!! Just pushing the problem onto someone else. Literally!