SACRAMENTO, CA — Opponents of California's landmark climate law say they have submitted almost twice the signatures needed to place a ballot measure before voters in November to suspend AB32 until the state's unemployment rate drops by more than half.
Backed by a coalition of business groups and financial contributions from Texas oil interests, the California Jobs Initiative seeks to put the most stringent clean energy mandate in the U.S. on ice until the state's unemployment rate, currently at 12.6 percent, falls to 5.5 percent -- and stays at that mark or better for four consecutive quarters. That statistical achievement has happened only three times in the past 30 years, the Associated Press notes.
Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger signed AB 32, the legislative muscle behind his environmental agenda, into law in 2006. Under the law, California must cut its greenhouse gas emission to 1990 levels, a reduction of about 25 percent, by 2020 through measures that include increased renewable energy and cleaner fuel requirements. AB 32 also calls for major polluters, such as power plants and oil refineries, to report and reduce their emissions, and pay fees for not meeting requirements.
“The effort to suspend AB 32 is the work of greedy oil companies who want to keep polluting in our state and making profits," Schwarzenegger said yesterday as the initiative backers submitted their signed petitions. "AB 32 will add jobs, create savings in energy costs and increase personal incomes. In fact, the highest job creation California is seeing right now is in our green economy. When I ran for governor, I said if special interests tried to push me around, I would push back. That’s exactly what I will do ..."
Supporters of the initiative say the state economy is too battered to withstand what they contend are billions of dollars in costs for fully implementing AB 32, whose key provisions take effect January 1, 2012.
"While the goals of AB 32 are admirable, clearly the implementation of this at this time ... would be a death knell for many small businesses," John Kabateck, executive director of the National Federation of Independent Business -- California, said at a news conference yesterday.
However, California's Air Resources Board contends in a recent report that AB 32 would have a modest effect on the state's economy while saving the state billions of dollars in avoided fuel expenses. The board issued its report in March amid growing controversy over the cost of AB 32.
According to the state's legislative analyst and director of finance, if the measure to suspend AB 32 is passed, it would have "potential positive, short-term impacts on state and local government revenues from the suspension of regulatory activity, with uncertain longer-run impacts. [With] potential foregone state revenues from the auctioning of emission allowances by state government, by suspending the future implementation of cap-and-trade regulations."
Backing efforts to suspend AB 32 are coalitions of small business and agricultural groups, the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association and other taxpayers' alliances, several minority chambers of commerce, lumber, logging and dairy groups, the California Republican Party and the Independent Oil Producers Agency.
Lending financial weight to the campaign are Valero Services Inc., which contributed $500,000; Occidental Petroleum, $300,000; and Tesoro Corporation, which contributed $275,000, according to figures from the California Secretary of State's Office reported by the Mercury News.
Lining up in support of AB 32 are companies and business groups -- ranging from Levi Strauss & Co., Waste Management and the San Francisco Chamber of Commerce to major Silicon Valley innovators including Google, Serious Materials and Bloom Energy. Also in the mix are renewable energy and other cleantech firms and environmental, health, labor, good government, faith and student groups. Major contributions came from the Green Tech Action Fund, $500,000; the Natural Resource Defense Council, $87,500; and the Environmental Defense Fund, $75,000.
Today, AARP joined the campaign that calls itself the "Stop the Texas Oil Companies' Dirty Energy Proposition." Yesterday, George Shultz, secretary of state for President Ronald Reagan, became honorary co-chair of the California for Clean Energy and Jobs Coalition. In a prepared statement, Shultz called the attempt to derail AB 33 "misguided" and said such a measure would "seriously harm" efforts to foster a clean energy economy and break dependence on foreign oil.
Backers of the California Jobs Initiative said they submitted petitions on Monday with about 800,000 signatures and needed just under 434,000 to qualify for the November 2 ballot.
Image CC licensed by Flickr user Håkan Dahlström.


Browse
Engage
Research









This whole website is disgusting
Why is there a full scale effort to sequester oxygen by trying to fix something that is not broken?
Control.
I say, as humans beings being OF this world, we have a duty, yes, a requirement to put as much CO2 in the atmosphere as possible so that oxygen is not sequestered.
Furthermore, all you warmers out there who were formally ice age doomers, we all know your schtick.
I CAN SEE NOVEMBER FROM MEXICO.
Greg Barton
Mountain View, home of disgusting Google who does ALL EVIL = EPIC FAIL
AB32 is a job killer
If our dear Governor believes the words that he spews, then having the voters vote on it should not be an issue at all. If the public believes that 1. California is the only state with such a law to reduce CO2 emmissions make the law entirely useless (49 other states can crank out as much as they want. and 2. AB32 when fully enacted with cause the loss of over 1 million jobs in California. then there vote would be easy.
Let the public speak Arnold. It's the right thing to do.
Humankind is not intelligent enough and is too self absorbed
The scientist and environmentalist James Lovelock offered two reasons why a meaningful response to global warming was well nigh impossible.
First, modern democracy is not capable of taking adequate action. Too much time is wasted in debate.
Second, humans had not evolved to a level of intelligence adequate to understand the complexity of climate change. The species had too much inertia and only catastrophes would convince us to act.
In other words, our species is too slow and stupid.
Disconcerting as this apocalyptic dismissal of human, political frailties is, there is something satisfyingly Darwinian about it.
Perhaps the species is in a race to destroy the environment in which it thrives. Once our air, water and land is destroyed, humans will disappear to be replaced by creatures better evolved to survive in what is left. Let us hope that these successors develop adequate politics and intelligence.
Maybe we should leave notes for them.
Carbon is a bogus issue when it come to climate change
When are you going to stop with the carbon obsession. Water Vapor is the dominant GHG, yet you ignore it totally. How can you have any credibility when you start out by taking 95% of GHG out of the equation. CO2 is a fraction of our greenhouse gases and human contribution is only 3% of the tiny carbon part of greenhouse gases.
Wake up and admit the horrible waste and damage you have brought about by your unthinking obsession with a meaningless part of the ghg equation. I suggest you focus on the plastic in the ocean. That is the problem that if we don't change to a compostable waste stream will damage future generations. A dead ocean is not good for anyone.
AB32 is an economy killer.
AB32 is not needed or wanted by Californians and you will see them vote in November to kill this abomination.
Ignorant
The consensus of millions of scientists don't agree with you. Climate change is real.
Fidel Castro made a profound observation last week that the oil disaster proves that governments are too weak to prevent large corporations from controlling the public's destiny:
"Fidel Castro says the spreading oil slick fouling the Gulf of Mexico is proof that the world's most powerful governments cannot control large corporations that now dictate the public's destiny.
Officials are rushing to seal an underwater oil gusher triggered after a deep-water rig operated by BP PLC exploded and sank on April 20, killing 11 people. It still is unclear whether some of the 3 million gallons of spilled crude could eventually reach Cuba's shores - though government scientists have appeared on state television to say the island is not immediately at risk.
In an opinion piece published by state media on Saturday, Castro said the disaster "shows how little governments can do against those who control the capital, who in both the United States and Europe are, due to the economy of our globalized planet, those who decide the destiny of the public."
Is this the same Fidel Castro
Is this the same Fidel Castro that is accepting $10 million from China to allow them to drill for oil in Cuban waters just 90 miles south of the Florida coast?