WASHINGTON, DC — Utilities need to go beyond the smart meter and use a range of energy-feedback tools to achieve significant reductions in customers' power consumption and their electricity bills, new research shows.
In a report released this week, the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy estimates that U.S. households could cut their electricity use by as much as 12 percent and save as much as $35 billion over the next 20 years. That is if customers have context for the data that advanced metering can provide, they are shown how they can slash their power use and costs, and they are sufficiently motivated to change.
"The bottom line here is very simple: Smart meters in and of themselves are just not 'smart' enough to get the job done for consumers and our economy," said John A. "Skip" Laitner, the council's director of Economic and Social Analysis.
"While advanced metering provides a useful tool to save energy, cut consumer electric bills and reduce greenhouse gas emissions from power plants, utilities need to use these advanced meters to provide consumers with information on their consumption in ways that grab consumers' attention and encourage them to take action," Laitner said in a statement.
By the end of 2008, 6.7 million advanced meters had been deployed among commercial, industrial and residential customers in 19 states, the ACEEE report said. At the time, just 4.7 percent of all residential meters were advanced devices.
Though deployment has since increased, smart metering is in place among just a fraction of customers. This year, the study said, the typical American household will spend about $1,500 for the electricity and natural gas. That household is also likely to use 20 percent to 30 percent more energy than necessary.
The report outlined ways that various forms of feedback can help curb energy waste and usher customers into a smart grid. The list includes:
Indirect feedback after consumption-- An "enhanced" utility bill or website that provides more than basic consumption data
-- "Whole-home" resource consumption information delivered by a vendor
-- Deeper contextual information, such as statistical analysis, delivered by a vendorDirect feedback via real-time technology
-- On-site/in-home energy display
-- Smart devices including appliances
-- Disaggregated and contextual informationAutomation Layers
-- Whole-home automation: generation, energy management, storage
The report also noted that third-party providers of feedback tools and technologies are likely to become increasingly important players in the process because of the bridge they provide between consumers of energy and the utilities that supply it.
The study highlighted a few of the early participants, including:
- OPower, which uses peer pressure to drive greater efficiency by providing personalized energy consumption reports to customers -- and comparing usage to that of their neighbors
- Efficiency 2.0, which enables users to develop an energy savings plan and connect with other like-minded people via social media
- Google, which is partnering with a number utilities through its PowerMeter program.













I think Smart meters are a
I think Smart meters are a valuable piece of technology that can provide us with the information to make informed, lifestyle changes in order to establish some progress on the energy front. If no one is looking to the data then benefiting from it is rather difficult.
Sustainability is ultimately a series of actions, choices that determine a lifestyle. What sustainability is not is a technological fix to supplement a wasteful lifestyle. The real "savings" in conservation come with people changing their daily routine and taking advantage of new fixtures/appliances/practices that optimize the information smart meters can offer.
People looking for the quick and easy fix won't find it here. Those in search of a tool to use in helping to become more informed may find smart meters as quite useful.
While smart meters are a step
While smart meters are a step up from having absolutely no feedback on your power use at all, they still don't provide enough granularity to do something about it.
And as stated above, the real reason the utility companies are deploying smart meters is so they can now charge more for usage during peak demand periods and save on labor costs for meter readers.
My company, Wise Energy Online (www.wiseenergyonline.com), provides a power monitoring solution that breaks out the individual appliances so that one can see where the power is being used and how much each of these individual loads is costing them. That's feedback they can use to proactively lower their electricity costs, both by ferreting out and replacing inefficient appliances and by changing their own habits.
With this type of feedback, most people can and will reduce their electricity use. Without the details though, it's almost impossible.
Reducing cost by 12% is
Reducing cost by 12% is hardly "slashing", more like a little nibble. Anyway, it seems that the goal is to charge consumers the same, or perhaps more, for a lesser amount of electricity. Except for some vague and doubtful benefit of "saving the planet", I see no reason for consumers to embrace this program.
We're a German company moving
We're a German company moving into the United States. I am the product support engineer.
Our product is mostly for Solar Photovoltaic installations but we have developed a tried and tested product that has sold to over 40,000 solar plants all over Europe. Our product addresses this issue directly.
Feel free to check us out! Unfortunately our home page is only in German right now (translated within the week) but if you have Google Chrome it'll take care of the work for you!
www.solar-log.com
"That is if customers have
"That is if customers have context for the data that advanced metering can provide, they are shown how they can slash their power use and costs, and they are sufficiently motivated to change."
-- It's called letting them use what they want and billing them accordingly. The system has been in place for a little over 100 years.
Were smart meters supposed to
Were smart meters supposed to actually reduce energy use? Being able to read them remotely and not having a meter reader walking to each house would have seemed to have been a fairly big benefit to the electric company. Of course consumers end up having the cost of the meter tacked onto their bill for the next couple of years so it's really win/win for the electric companies. Does splitting my usage into days/hours/minutes give me any more resolution than seeing my monthly bill? Yes I have a kill-a-watt, so I know how much electricity my devices use, but does it really play a decision in whether I'm going to watch tv, or make the room more comfortable? No. At this point I can't really think of a lifestyle change I'm willing to make other than shutting down the server when I don't think I'm going to be using it for a couple of days. Keep it hotter in here? Nope. Cut out my one or two hours of tv per night? Nope. Build a more energy efficient computer and only use the more powerful ones when I need to? Nope. Handwash instead of using dishwasher? Hang laundry instead of using dryer....eh...probably not.
Do an energy audit. Make upgrades that have a decent ROI. Keep power consumption in mind when buying devices. Otherwise, just live your life.
Ahh, the old ignore the
Ahh, the old ignore the problem and hope it goes away...
Hey, it worked with that whole Ozone layer thing, and BP seems to think it will work with the Gulf, so why not... Worth a shot right ?
I agree with Russ. That
I agree with Russ. That sounds like a much more effective method of energy conservation.
Surprise, surprise! What did
Surprise, surprise!
What did people think they were going to do? They are nothing more than a tool for the utilities for time of day rates.
Inside the house there needs to be a display of what appliance is using what watts in order that the resident may turn on/off consumers in the most beneficial manner.
Those do exist but to date nothing is reasonable in cost.
Personally I have used a meter for days on each consumer to learn the data but most people aren't interested in playing games like that.