SAN DIEGO, CA — Businesses that let 100 employees work half of their time from home can save more than $1 million a year according to Telework Research Network's (TRN) latest study of telework programs and their benefits.
TRN looked at more than 250 case studies, research papers and other documents on telework (also called telecommuting and workshifting), and combined that with interviews with companies, researchers and more to figure out how telecommuting benefits employers, employees, the environment and communities.
In "Workshifting Benefits: The Bottom Line," TRN says that letting one employee work half of their time out of the office saves their company about $10,000 per year and the employee up to $6,800 per year.
While 80 percent of workers want to telecommute and 30 percent would take a pay cut in order to telecommute, less than 2 percent of employees work from home the majority of their time and at least 40 percent have jobs that are compatible with telecommuting.
About half of the $1.1 million that a company would save ($576,000) with 100 workers telecommuting halftime would come from increased productivity from fewer interruptions, better time management and employees putting in more hours by working when they would have been commuting.
Companies would also save $304,000 a year in electricity, real estate and related costs from parking lot leases, furniture, supplies, maintenance and space consolidation. About $113,000 would come from fewer unscheduled absences, less sick time and from employees working while sick or waiting for personal appointments (cable installation, delivery, etc.) that would normally result in a full day off of work. Lastly, $76,000 would be saved due to lower employee turnover.
Employees, on the other hand, would save anywhere from $2,000 to $6,800 and about two work weeks worth of time due to using less gas, and avoiding parking, food, clothing and other costs. Gas savings would total about $360 per year, collectively adding up to $15 billion across the U.S. and result in greenhouse gas emission reductions of 53 million metric tons.
"Workshifting Benefits" includes savings for companies, which came from TRN's telework savings calculator, for letting 50, 100 or 500 employees telework halftime, along with the total savings for the U.S.
Empty office - CC license by Flickr user Iain Farrell




![Ending the alphabet soup in the [insert word here] field Ending the alphabet soup in the [insert word here] field](http://www.greenbiz.com/sites/default/files/imagecache/wide_small/130516-voien1-w.jpg)








This is a great study and
This is a great study and will hopefully lead to some long needed adjustments to employees' work habit expectations.
One thing left out of this discussion is if, while offsite telecommuting employees (albeit working from home) would still be working for their respective companies' benefit, if they would be justly compensated for related expenses, such as home office electricity, supplies, etc. Hopefully this wouldn't hamper the effort to bring this kind of forward thinking about, but it must be considered in any model.
Excellent validation of
Excellent validation of savings. We had previously seen $9,000/employee in our workplace.
This is an important study
This is an important study for businesses interested in improving their triple bottom line, particularly small businesses. Allowing workers to take advantage of flex time and telecommuting is a great way to increase productivity and add value to your business, all while significantly reducing your business' per employee carbon footprint. It is nice to see instances in which one single decision can benefit all three components of the 3BL. Telecommuting and flex time gives businesses, including SMEs flexibility that they may not necessary have otherwise. It also allows home-based businesses and sole proprietors to compete in this complex, difficult global market, which is good for spurring innovation and investment. It was great to read the results from this study, and I hope it inspires more businesses to get creative in how they operate and view work hours and facilities. Hopefully an increase in telecommuting will also help to spur investments in residential energy efficiency and alternative energy, as the line between a business’ footprint and that of its employees begins to blur somewhat.
- Tim Kovach
Product Coordinator, Energy at COSE
www.cose.org/blog
www.twitter.com/COSEenergy