WASHINGTON, DC — Tests of reusable grocery bags in Florida found that some plastic bags contain more lead than will be allowed in kid's toys. Coupled with previous cases of lead found in bags, the federal government is being called on to investigate and ban lead in bags.
The Tampa Tribune commissioned tests of bags from the Winn-Dixie and Publix grocery chains, finding both companies' bags had more than 100 parts per million (ppm) of lead, the federal limit for the chemical in kid's toys starting in August. The amount of lead also exceeds the federal limit for paint on consumer products.
The tests, conducted by Thornton Laboratories, found that bags with elaborate illustrations, particularly with yellow and green colors, were more likely to contain lead. A nylon bag from Target, and bags with simple illustrations from Sweetbay, Walmart and Publix, were found to contain little lead.
The presence of lead, though, does not present an immediate danger. The Tampa Tribune reports:
The lead appears to be in a form that is not easily extracted or leached, [Hugh] Rodrigues [owner of Thornton Laboratories] said. It is not in a form that would rub off on food simply by touching the bag, like wet paint, he said, but over time, bags wear down and paint can flake off and threads can fray, releasing the lead.
All of the bags with high lead levels were made in China, which has been at the center of other cases involving chemicals in products.
The 1.7 million RC2 Corp. toys and the 2 million Mattel toys that were recalled in 2007 over high lead content came from Chinese manufacturers, 21 percent of toys that the Ecology Center found had significant levels of hazardous chemicals in 2008 came from China, and once lead became a high-profile matter, Chinese companies started switching to cadmium, which also poses dangers when in consumer goods.
Publix has so far asked its suppliers to lower the lead content in their bags, and both Publix and Winn-Dixie are offering refunds to customers.
Earlier this year, bags from Wegmans grocery stores were found to contain up to 799 ppm of lead, and the company stopped selling the two styles with excessive lead content.
U.S. Sen. Charles Schumer has called for the government to step in, and is urging the Food and Drug Administration, Environmental Protection Agency and Consumer Product Safety Commission to look into the issue and ban reusable bags with lead above federal limits.
The matter has put others on the defense, with Envirosax issuing a statement explaining its polyester bags are lead-free and tested down to the 10 ppm level.
Reusable bags - CC license by Flickr user tyger_lyllie

Browse
Engage
Research









I have a few Publix bags, so
I have a few Publix bags, so what can we do with them? Can we recycle them, and if so where?
What is one to think about
What is one to think about Publix' bags? Are they safe or not? In one paragraph, the article states the lead content in Publix' bags are more than 100ppm, which is greater than the lead limit. Few paragraphs down it says the nylon Publix bags are safe. Which is it?
Follow the link to the
Follow the link to the original story at the Tribune. This warning is for 3 very specific bags. You'll understand which ones if you've ever bought any like that. I have one from Whole Foods. It's double layer - the outside is coated & shiny. The inks/dyes seem to be issue not the bags. That's not surprising. Pretty much all pigments have lead. The more something is coated the higher chance of having a detectable limit of lead.
When in doubt... try not to eat the bag.
based on the headline, i was
based on the headline, i was hoping to see that the American Chemistry Council (or similar industry group that is opposed to local bans on disposal plastic bags) had counter-proposed a ban on reusable bags. don't think they won't be using this new story in their campaigns against banning disposable plastic shopping bags (or
"recyclable" plastic shopping bags, as I'm sure they'd prefer they were called).
I would say the headline is a
I would say the headline is a bit exaggerating - in the article itself it said that "U.S. Sen. Charles Schumer has called for the government to step in, an is urging the Food and Drug Administration, Environmental Protection Agency and Consumer Product Safety Commission to look into the issue and ban reusable bags with lead above federal limits."
So, I guess it would be more accurate to say: Reusable Shopping Bag Ban Proposed After Lead Discovery for Bags With Leas Above Federal Limits.
Your headline is misleading:
Your headline is misleading: it's not the reusable shopping bags that are being banned: it's the lead in them that is being banned.
Just because we have embraced
Just because we have embraced the whole sustainability concept and everyone seems to be moving towards a more caring response to the environment does not mean we won't be conned by slippery producers of green goods!
Some supposed green products and services are worse than the old ways or products - it's just that the pollution or damage is more carefully hidden.