WASHINGTON, DC — President Obama yesterday gave a much-touted and much-discussed speech at Georgetown University yesterday about energy security in the United States and the move toward a low-carbon economy.
The speech (which you can read the prepared marks of here) comes at a time when political unrest in the Middle East and soaring demand are driving oil prices to levels not seen since 2007. And Obama's speech looks at the alternatives, in the most pragmatic light possible.
"So here’s the bottom line -- there are no quick fixes," Obama said. "And we will keep on being a victim to shifts in the oil market until we get serious about a long-term policy for secure, affordable energy."
In the speech, Obama sets an ambitious goal, although one that's fuzzily defined:
"So today, I’m setting a new goal: one that is reasonable, achievable, and necessary. When I was elected to this office, America imported 11 million barrels of oil a day. By a little more than a decade from now, we will have cut that by one-third."
How the country will go about achieving this goal is not one that will likely leave environmentalists and clean energy groups entirely happy. Obama said that there will be two key elements of cutting oil use: "Finding and producing more oil at home, and reducing our dependence on oil with cleaner alternative fuels and greater efficiency."
Throughout the speech and in his proposals, Obama leans heavily on fossil fuels -- first with increasing offshore oil production and spurring the oil industry to begin oil production at onshore leases oil companies already hold, then with natural gas drilling as an alternative to oil.
Only about halfway into the speech does Obama present low-carbon solutions to the energy crisis. Biofuels will be critical to this effort, and the administration is working to help companies open in the next two years refineries capable of producing 80 million gallons of biofuels per year.
The president also focused on energy and fuel efficiency as critical elements to a successful clean-energy transition. From mandating cars that get much higher fuel efficiency rates to pushing forward on his ambitious Clean Energy Standard -- which sets a goal of 80 percent renewable energy in this country by 2035 -- Obama sees the low-carbon future as a more efficient one.
Although highly pragmatic, and perhaps disappointing to those who would prefer high-flying and ambitious goals, Obama has shown throughout his first two terms to be most successful when he's most pragmatic, as was the case last fall in the wake of the midterm elections.
For more detailed parsing of the President's energy speech, see Greenwire, this nifty annotated version of the text at Science Magazine, and a very negative review at Grist.
Official White House Photo by Chuck Kennedy














Looks as if global warming
Looks as if global warming will take a back seat as far as issues are concerned, jobs and the economy will be first.
The President and your article neglected to point out with peak oil and the rapid increase of oil consumption by not only the BRIC's and even the exporting nations this "goal" of cutting imports by one third will no doubt happen anyway...
the "invisible" hand is at work again!
Global warming (change to
Global warming (change to climate change) SHOULD take a back seat, since more data (unadulterated) shows we are in a cooling cycle. Jobs and economy have to be first. Although it is clear that the loss of jobs has decreased our ghg output, because we are not driving, have no jobs, can't keep our houses, are watching our unemployed children with college educations still being paid for, with no reasonable expectation of their own sustainability.
Peak oil is a big question mark, and the hypocrisy of sending our money to central American countries to drill oil and build refineries is proof of point. One world, one globe, okay to drill anywhere but here? We just give money to countries, fight wars in countries, send our kids to hostile places because we can't find leadership to use our own resources?
And the baloney about the viability of wind and solar, with no emphasis on biomass fuel, and other undervalued resources that could be used as energy feedstocks that actually produce more energy for the USA than wind and solar combined.
The only time Obama talked about real energy policy was when he had Sarah Palin nipping at his heels. As soon as the election was over, he was back to his "electricity rates will necessarily spike under my plan", "policy", where he bankrupts America and her citizens.
Is it 2012 yet? I have been a Democrat for 40 years, and I can't wait!!