[Article updated on 9/12/11 at 13:30pm]
It's been talked about for years and has a bigger buzz -- at least in the utility industry -- than the next iPhone, but the smart grid is still largely a mystery to the consumers who will have to embrace it in order for it and all it promises to become reality.
The Atlanta-based Smart Grid Consumer Collective (SGCC) has been working to help make that happen for the past year and a half, and its efforts are starting to pick up steam. Already in 2011, the SGCC has nearly doubled its membership, and as GridWeek kicks off this week, the group is expected to roll out some data about what consumers want and expect from a smart grid.
SGCC launched in March 2010 to provide stakeholders with research and best practices that helps them educate consumers about smart grid technology. By January 2011, the group counted 40 members on its roster, and as of last week the SGCC had 70 organizations as members, including infrastructure and technology giants such as GE and Cisco, investor-owned utilities such as Southern California Edison and Duke Energy and non-profit advocacy groups such as Environmental Defense Fund and Sierra Club.
"We want everyone at the table who cares about this issue," said Patty Durand, SGCC executive director. "Different groups can be adversarial with each other because they don't have the ability to talk to each other except at public hearings. We wanted to be a source of information and a facilitator for conversation."
SGCC's current focus -- besides growing its membership ranks -- is to research consumer attitudes about smart grid technology and help stakeholders educate the public about the positives of smart grids. It's a much-needed focus, given the anti-smart meter protests that have popped up around the country as utilities try to roll out the first phase of their smart grid projects.
Eventually the organization will act as an independent clearing house of facts and data about the smart grid. This will help consumers make their own decisions about the technology, according to Durand, who used to head up the Georgia chapter of the Sierra Club.
"This organization cares about consumer education and wants to make sure that we're not perceived to be serving the utilities' interests," she said. "They thought my background with the Sierra Club would disprove any doubt in that area [because] Sierra Club is willing to oppose utilities directly."
SGCC seems to be getting its message across to its current target market. Membership is divided pretty evenly between its three main target categories: technology vendors, utilities and advocacy-focused non-profits interested in sustainability and consumer issues.
Utilities like it because they always knew they would need a comprehensive consumer education effort but hadn't designed one even as roll outs started, said Zanku Armenian, senior manager for Southern California Edison and an SGCC board member.
As the first meters were installed, utilities chose not to talk much about them because the rest of the technology wasn't ready for prime time yet and wouldn't be for a couple of years, he said. But public health and privacy concerns were soon raised and the viability of smart meters was suddenly thrown into question. " It turns out that we probably should have done some more upfront communication about what the technology entails," he said. "It was a lesson learned by everyone."
To make those lessons more concrete, the SGCC is releasing the first round of data from a survey of individuals aimed at highlighting what they see as the perceived benefits of smart grid technologies. According to preliminary findings from the 2011 Consumer Price Survey, rate payers say saving money and increasing energy efficiency are the two smart grid ideals that are most likely to move them to adopt smart grid technology. Among the other findings of the study:
- Making service more reliable and protecting the environment also rate near the top of that list.
- Saving money is most likely to "strongly" increase support for 56 percent of respondents and somewhat increase it for 24 percent more.
- Slightly less of the 1,200 people surveyed -- 55 percent -- said that "avoid wasting energy" and "more U.S. energy independence" would strongly increase their support of smart grid tech while 53 percent cited "more reliable service" and "protect the environment" as reasons that would strongly influence them.
- More rate and billing choice ranked lowest of the seven options presented in the survey, with only 46 percent of people saying that it would strongly increase their interest in having smart grid technology installed.
Article updated on 9/12/11 at 13:30pm to include just-released data from a consumer survey conducted by SGCC.
Photo CC-licensed by Portland General.














"Smart Grid Education" is
"Smart Grid Education" is corporate propaganda to hide the truth. "Wireless microwave radiation" is hurting people, pets and plants. I was not sensitive to EMFs until I was exposed to "Smart Meters" in the area.
This seems a lot like the smoking fiasco; years of companies claiming that smoking does not cause cancer while millions of smokers died. How long will it take for people to wise up to this time?
Until the PSC or the FCC come
Until the PSC or the FCC come up with a long-term health study proving the Grid to be 100% safe I will trust: Joshua Hart, Prof.Daniel Hirsch, Dr.Karl Maret,Devvy Kidd, Dr.Sam Milham, Dr.Bill Deagle, Rob States, Sandi Mauer, Deborah Tevares, Cindy Sage, Orlean Koehle, Jerry Day,Dr.Magda Havas, Patrick Wood and many, many more working hard to get the truth out.
Not sure how this is supposed
Not sure how this is supposed to help the environment as smart meters seem to kill the shrubs around them. Plus as a person that is affected directly by microwave radiation I can tell you that it has profoundly changed my life. I had two cell towers installed behind our home last year and I have been extremely ill ever since. My doctor has other patients as well that are affected.
Where are people that are sensitive to this technology supposed to go? How are we to cope with being ill for the rest of our lives for no better reason than to transmit date through the air as opposed to a wire? People are getting sick from smart meters, wi-fi, cordless phones, cell towers, cell phones, etc. They all use microwave radiation to work. The smart grid uses this same radiation to transmit all this information around, through the air, through your house and your neighbours house, through you, through your kids, through your pets, etc.
This smart grid system is not worth the ruin of our society's health. Wake up everyone and start looking into this. It's a colossal mistake!!!