Would you use skin lotion that contains a known carcinogen, or wash your child's hair with a shampoo that has formaldehyde?
Bowing to public pressure to provide safer formulations of everyday products such as these, Johnson & Johnson (J&J) this week is pledging to remove potentially harmful and carcinogenic chemicals from its lotions and adult toiletries by 2015.
That includes brands like Aveena, Neutrogena, Clean & Clear, and Lubriderm.
The move follows J&J's decision late last year to remove "chemicals of concern" from its iconic Johnson's Baby Shampoo and other baby-care lotions in the US by the end of 2013.
“We applaud Johnson & Johnson for its leadership in committing to remove cancer-causing chemicals from its products. We will be vigilant in making sure [J&J] meets its commitments and will continue to encourage it to remove other ingredients of concern," says Lisa Archer, director of the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics at the Breast Cancer Fund, a co-founder of the campaign.
In particular, the company is eliminating a preservative called quaternium-15 that releases formaldehyde, a known carcinogen. The inclusion of that substance in the US formulation of Johnson's Baby Shampoo drew the notice of the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics, especially since a formaldehyde-free version was being sold in other countries.
J&J's commitment also calls for it to:
- Reduce 1,4 dioxane (another probable human carcinogen) to a maximum of 10 parts per million in adult products;
- Limit parabens in adult products to methyl-, ethyl- and propyl-;
- Complete phase-out of triclosan from all products;
- Phase out Diethyl Phthalate (DEP) from all products (no other phthalates are currently used);
- Phase out polycyclic musks, animal derived ingredients, tagates, rose crystal and diacetyl from fragrances.
Next page: Most aggressive stance by a beauty products company?














1,4 dioxane can be removed
1,4 dioxane can be removed from ethoxylated surfactants by vacuum stripping, so I'm not sure about the policy to retain it in the company's formulations. The only downside with vacuum stripping is the added expense, which I'm sure would be a minimal addition to retail prices if passed on to the consumer.