Growing change: Can agriculture be good for the climate?
Last year California set a goal to become carbon-neutral by 2045. Some called it unrealistic, while we call it mission-critical. But how do we get there? As we search for ways to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to prevent global atmospheric temperatures from rising above 1.5 degrees and result in irreversible climate change, one of the best answers is as old as the dirt under our feet, literally.
Let’s go back to basic science. Soil naturally has large amounts of carbon. Healthy soil — soil rich in nutrients and able to retain water — holds the carbon that plants absorb from the air and bring into their root system and sequester in the soil as root and plant matter decompose. Also, healthy soil is teeming with microbes which also bring carbon deep in the soil.
Agricultural scientists across the globe, including at Stanford University and the University of California, Davis, have in recent years been making new discoveries showing that healthy soil holds more carbon than previously thought and that good soil management can serve as an important carbon sink. Soil, writes Rob Jackson of Stanford’s Woods Institute for the Environment, "is a no-risk climate solution with big co-benefits. Fostering soil health protects food security and builds resilience to droughts, floods and urbanization."
Unfortunately, over the last half-century of primarily monocrop agriculture, repeated plowing and regular use of pesticides and chemical fertilizers, the average amount of carbon content in agricultural soil gradually has depleted, according to studies, which has led to the need for more fertilizer to maintain production levels. Between synthetic fertilizer and cattle growing via confined animal feeding operations to satisfy a world population hungry for meat, agriculture is a net carbon emitter — a substantial one. Agriculture accounts for about 13 percent of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and 9 percent of U.S. emissions, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. When including the emissions resulting from clearing forested land to plant crops, those numbers are even bigger.
But lately, a healthy soil movement has taken hold, focused on practices referred to as regenerative farming, offering intriguing possibilities of agriculture as a carbon sink. Often born of necessity as farmers grapple with less water, increased erosion and the rising costs of chemical fertilizer, some farmers are adopting a set of practices to make soil resilient, rich and in need of fewer inputs — and it so happens such soil is better at storing carbon underground. These regenerative practices include reduced tilling to keep decomposing organic matter in the soil; planting off-season cover crops which bring new nutrients to the soil and protect it from erosion; using compost and manure as fertilizer; and rotating crops and animal grazing among fields to give soil a chance to replenish. Collectively, these practices reduce the need for irrigation, fertilizer and herbicides.
California also has a Healthy Soils Program that promotes practices that nurture soil on California’s farmlands and ranchlands. Before the state legislature is SB 253, which would create the California Environmental Farming Incentive Program to provide technical and financial assistance to farmers who create wildlife-friendly improvements on their land to promote biodiversity and improve soil. We believe all these efforts are worthwhile.
While regenerative farming helps in the effort to rein in climate change by drawing carbon from the atmosphere into the soil, it has many other farming benefits, such as lower costs for water and fertilizers because healthier soil needs fewer inputs. Consequently, regenerative farming is gaining adherents among farmers and food and beverage companies.
Two regen farming advocates
Fetzer Vineyards and General Mills are two major food and beverage companies with extensive supply chains in California that are advocates of regenerative farming. They also happen to be partners in the Ceres Connect the Drops initiative, which promotes sustainable water management in California. Fetzer Vineyards incorporates regenerative techniques on its vineyards in Mendocino County and General Mills sources from farmers who practice regenerative farming. Both support the increased understanding and adoption of regenerative farming practices.
At Fetzer Vineyards' organically farmed brand, Bonterra Organic Vineyards in Mendocino County, vineyard managers follow a reduced tillage regime, allowing the soil to nourish itself with the plant residue of previous seasons and microbes working in the soil. The Bonterra team plants cover crops to prevent topsoil erosion and allows sheep to graze on these cover crops and grasses, reducing the need for machine mowing while promoting soil fertility, according to Joseph Brinkley, director of vineyard operations.
Additionally, the Bonterra team applies compost, generated on-site, for fertilizer.
Last month, Bonterra announced a study undertook in partnership with Pacific Agroecology Inc. that included year-long monitoring and research comparing carbon levels in vineyards in Mendocino County. It measured soil organic carbon (SOC) storage, benchmarking results against a nearby conventionally farmed vineyard. In all, the research Bonterra commissioned tested 100 soil samples and 500 vine root samples periodically over the course of a year.
The Pacific Agroecology found that soil samples from the Biodynamic form of regenerative agriculture and organic vineyards held an average 12.8 percent and 9.4 percent more SOC respectively than samples from the conventionally farmed vineyard, according to the researchers.
Elizabeth Drake, director of regenerative development at Fetzer, says, "The results of this study provide early indication that regenerative farming practices lead to healthier, more productive soils, while contributing to the mitigation of climate change by holding more carbon underground."
In 2015, General Mills set a goal to reduce GHG emissions across its value chain by 28 percent from 2010 levels by 2025 and it sees reducing agricultural emissions as key to reaching that goal.
"The majority of our GHG emissions come from the supply chain and 50 percent of those emissions come from agriculture," says Christina Skonberg, senior sustainability analyst at General Mills. "We see regenerative agriculture as a critical part of how we can address climate change." Regenerative practices also have the potential to build economic resilience on farms by reducing the need for expensive inputs and helping farmers buffer risk from threats such as pests, diseases and climate shocks, she says.
As climate change has increased the severity and likelihood of droughts and floods, farmers and everyone who depends on them face more risks. We hope the state legislature and air regulators continue on their path of developing and adequately funding programs that encourage regenerative farming practices, conservation and smart land management, such as SB 253 and the Natural and Working Lands Climate Change Plan. Otherwise, steadily increasing incidences of extreme weather events will have dire consequences for farmers and all of us.
Carbon neutrality and holding down atmospheric temperature rise to not exceed 1.5 degrees Celsius are, as we said, mission-critical.
This story first appeared on: