How can a wireless network help both rhino resilience and water quality?
The sun beats down on the dried Tanzanian soils. Dust is slowly settling back down to the ground in the wake of a parade of tourists’ vehicle disappearing over the horizon. It’s dry season in the Serengeti National Park, and safari trucks groan under the weight of excited visitors.
The park, a World Heritage Site, draws tourists from all over the world. Its ecosystem is carefully managed by hard-working park rangers — a delicate balancing act between wildlife promotion and preservation made even more daunting by poachers in pursuit of the endangered eastern black rhino.
Protecting rhinos from poachers always has been an integral part of park management. While it’s still a complicated and highly skilled endeavor, it’s been made a little easier thanks to recent advances in data communications technology. Using geolocation sensors implanted in the rhinos’ horns and novel wireless telecommunications technology known as a low-power wide-area network (LPWAN), rangers can track the Serengeti’s rhinos from a central location, then concentrate their surveillance efforts where the animals are at any given time.
"If you have the information on where the animals are, then you can guide the protection to them," said Laurens de Groot, co-founder of Smart Parks, which is applying the technology at Serengeti. "We can place the sensors on tourist vehicles, fences, water level measures, rangers — you can see everything you need from one control room."
De Groot and his organization have been working on optimizing data communications systems used in wildlife conservation —including the Serengeti project — for five years.
"Our aim is to make everything in the park measurable, so the manager knows how to anticipate certain circumstances," he said.
The LPWAN edge
From wildlife conservation to oceanography, every single aspect of environmental science and management has a common factor at its heart: data. These data vary enormously across disciplines and projects, not just in the form they take, but by how they are collected.
In the last few years, LPWANs have shaken things up significantly in the data collection world relative to the better-known data collection and transmission tools of WiFi, Bluetooth and mobile internet. WiFi and Bluetooth have a limited range of around 100–150 feet and 35 feet, respectively. Mobile internet has great range and can carry data at the high rate required to support voice calls, video and image sharing, but it requires a huge amount of power.
This combination of distance and low power needs makes the technology ideal for application, not only to tracking endangered species, but for other conservation and environmental protection work as well.
LPWANs can be used to reduce conflict between wildlife and people, too. In Assam, India, Smart Parks is installing smart sensors on fences bordering farmland and communities. When an elephant shows up, the sensor alerts people to its presence. The rangers then can scare the animal away, preventing damage to communities and crops.
"We’re using human-made technology in order for reserves and animals to have as little interaction with humans as possible," de Groot said.
Some have expressed concern that poachers could co-opt LPWANs and use them to find and steal animals. But de Groot isn’t worried.
"In 2018, it’s almost ridiculous to say something can’t be hacked. But our data are very well encrypted, and the signal is sent on such low power that you’d need to be highly skilled to even detect it, let alone decrypt and read it," he said. "By that point, the animal you were tracking would probably have moved on anyway."
Meanwhile, in Dublin, Ireland, engineers, academics, telecommunications providers and local government have teamed up to demonstrate the potential power of LPWANs in optimizing water services. Nimbus Research Centre in Cork has deployed sensors along the River Liffey to gather data on water depth, temperature and velocity.
"The idea is to integrate this with other data feeds from various sensors — so you can imagine rainfall sensors, flow sensors, all integrated together," said center water coordinator Kevin Fitzgibbon. These data can be used to inform decisions around infrastructure planning and maintenance, such as installing energy-saving valves, repairing leaks, cleaning up pathogens and optimizing water recycling.
European Union regulations around soil fertilization are fairly broad — farmers can spread fertilizer any time between March and October (PDF) — and it’s not uncommon for it to end up polluting water in addition to nourishing crops.
LPWAN technology could make it easy to gather data — soil moisture, water phosphorus levels and air moisture — and feed them into an app. "You’d have a platform for an operator or a technician to say, ‘Don’t spray now; your ground is water logged; there’s a spike in water phosphorus levels,’" Fitzgibbon said. "Then a message could be pushed out when the conditions reach optimal levels."
An Australian business, The Yield, already has developed technology and analytical frameworks very similar to those Fitzgibbon imagines. It’s produced a service for farmers that integrates sensor data from the ground with local weather conditions. Sensors deployed by the company can measure temperature, humidity, barometric pressure, wind speed and direction, and more. This allows customers to base decisions around irrigation, fertilization and harvest on accurate, highly localized data so they not only can save time and money but avoid wasting resources.
"We know we need to be able to farm better — to produce the right amount of yield so we can avoid gluts and wastage which we see so often in the agricultural world," explained Felicity Turner, general manager of customer experience.
Farmers don’t have to err on the side of caution quite so often.The Yield is sharing data it gathers with researchers at the University of Technology, Sydney, who are working on crop and livestock disease prediction models. They’ve been particularly focused on Pacific oyster mortality syndrome (POMS), a viral disease estimated to have cost the Australian state of Tasmania $4.2 million during one 2016 outbreak.
Who will pay?
If LPWAN is so valuable, why aren’t more people using it?
"The biggest barrier to adoption of LPWAN is — who is going to pay for the infrastructure?" Fitzgibbon said.
This infrastructure is extremely cheap compared to other telecommunications networks, such as WiFi and cell phone coverage. But it still needs to come from somewhere. For LPWAN usage to be widespread and accessible, base stations, also known as gateways, need to be installed and maintained across the desired coverage distance of the network of sensors being used to collect the data.
Some World Heritage Sites and research facilities might have the resources to support these tech solutions, but smaller scale projects may not. Worldwide, some local governments and corporations are already working on developing LPWAN infrastructure — but these bodies are not always inclined to make it openly accessible.
The future of LPWANs in sustainability and environmental management clearly lies in the hands of those who have the money and power to make it happen. That means proponents of the networks need to be just as business-wise as they are tech-savvy.
"How do we commercialize these ideas to make this a reality?" asked Fitzgibbon. "The technology is capable of doing many things, but if it doesn’t have a business case, it will only ever be a demonstration project."
One thing is certain: If the resources are available to deploy the technology, countless opportunities await to apply it to shaping a healthier environment around the world.
This story first appeared on: