Inside Coke and McDonald's new war on waste
Two of the world’s most iconic food and beverage brands have launched ambitious initiatives aimed at significantly reducing waste and increasing the recycled and biobased content of their packaging. Together, they mark the acceleration of a yearslong war on waste.
- McDonald’s Corp. last week announced plans to make 100 percent of its consumer packaging from "renewable, recyclable and certified materials" by 2025. It also pledged to offer consumer package recycling in all of its restaurants worldwide by that date.
- A few days later, the Coca-Cola Company announced "World Without Waste," a global goal to help collect and recycle "the equivalent" of 100 percent of its packaging by 2030, as well as to make bottles with an average of 50 percent recycled content by then.
The twin announcements signal a new era among large consumer brands to take responsibility for their packaging. It’s coming in an age of increased global concern over the prevalence of plastic and other waste materials in waterways and oceans, not to mention streets and landscapes around the world. It also comes at a time when brands such as Coke and McDonald’s recognize that their global growth ambitions could be stymied by consumer, activist and governmental pushback against mounting waste streams.
Both companies’ goals will require considerable effort. For McDonald’s, it will require setting up recycling programs in restaurants across the more than 100 countries where it operates. Currently, recycling is in only about 10 percent of McDonald’s restaurants globally, according to Francesca DeBiase, chief supply chain and sustainability officer for McDonald's Corp. Meeting its goal means the company will have to address the dearth of recycling infrastructure in many parts of the world.
Both companies’ challenges are compounded by the fact that neither controls the source of its waste problem: McDonald’s restaurants and Coke bottling plants are owned and operated by franchisees, not by the parent companies, meaning that they will have to work closely with these independent operators to ensure their initiatives achieve their goals between now and 2025 (for McDonald’s) and 2030 (for Coke).
And, as both companies have learned, the franchisees are known to push back against mandates they believe are draconian or too expensive.
The Coke and McDonald’s announcements are merely the latest steps in their efforts to curb waste that go back to the 1980s, when awareness of "overflowing landfills" helped spur the modern environmental movement. Both companies long have been the target of environmentalists and anti-litter activists.
In the 1970s, Coke, along with Pepsi and other beverage companies, introduced recycling while simultaneously battling communities seeking to impose deposit schemes to increase the takeback of bottles and cans to reduce local litter. Similarly, McDonald’s packaging, especially its polystyrene foam "clamshell" hamburger containers, was an activist target; the company banned foam clamshells in 1990 in response to consumer and local government pressures. Over the years, both companies have taken numerous steps to eliminate solid waste and to reduce the amount of material used to package their products.
Coca-Cola’s latest initiative was driven in part by James Quincey, a 22-year company veteran who ascended to become its CEO last year. Ben R. Jordan, Coke’s director of supplier sustainability, told me that Quincey’s support has been key to making this "a major business initiative" at Coke, as opposed to a sustainability initiative — that is, core to the company’s strategy for growth and profitability. "I’ve been at Coke 21 years," Jordan told me. "I’ve never been associated with a project or an initiative quite like this."
Currently, only a relatively small portion of Coke’s beverage containers are recycled. The company’s latest sustainability report stated that it "refilled or helped to recover and recycle bottles and cans equivalent to approximately 59 percent (as estimated) of those that we introduced into developed markets" in 2016. But the company doesn’t report package recovery rates for emerging markets.
Those emerging markets represent a Herculean challenge, and a potential bottleneck for the company’s ambitious packaging recovery plans. A 2015 report by Ocean Conservancy and McKinsey found that 60 percent of the plastic that enters the world's seas originates from just five countries: China; Indonesia; the Philippines; Thailand; and Vietnam.
Between 5 million and 13 million tons of plastic leaks into the world’s oceans each year, some of it ingested by seabirds, fish and other organisms, and by 2050 the ocean will contain more plastic by weight than fish, according to research (PDF) by the Ellen MacArthur Foundation.
One success story is in Mexico, where Coca-Cola FEMSA and Arca Continental, two multinational beverage companies headquartered in Monterrey, bottle and distribute Coca-Cola products in that country. FEMSA and Arca are among 80 food and beverage brands that sponsor a nonprofit program called ECOCE (Ecología y Compromiso Empresarial), which facilitates the recovery of packaging for recycling in Mexico. Among other things, ECOCE operates a program that collects packaging waste in schools, from kindergartens through secondary. Students recover and recycle waste from PET containers, high-density polyethylene (HDPE), aluminum and plastic bags generated in their homes or at school.
According to ECOCE, Mexico is the world’s leading recycler of PET bottles and containers, recovering just over 50 percent of bottles, compared to just over 30 percent in the United States. Coca-Cola is evaluating how it can replicate the Mexican model in other markets.
Another part of the strategy is to leverage the relationships it built to tackle Coke’s 2007 commitment to replenish 100 percent of the fresh water it extracts to produce its products by 2020. In 2016, the company announced that it had met its goal five years early, returning the equivalent amount of water used in its global sales back to nature and communities — the first Fortune 500 company to achieve such a water-replenishment target. The nonprofit environmental group WWF was a key partner in that effort.
The local partnerships created to tackle water could be leveraged to address waste, said Jordan. "We’ve got teams on the ground on both the Coca-Cola side and the WWF side who have been working for years around watershed improvements in the Yangtze River. They’ve been focused just on the freshwater elements. Why not scale that up to think about waste as part of that as well? They’re engaging in this community. They’re engaging in that watershed."
In addition to WWF, Coke plans to work with other global partners, including the Ellen MacArthur Foundation’s New Plastics Economy initiative and the Ocean Conservancy's Trash Free Seas Alliance. The company also will launch efforts with new partners at the regional and local levels and work with its key customers to help motivate consumers to recycle more packaging.
Out the door
McDonald’s, for its part, faces its own waste-recovery hurdle: Most of its packaging leaves its restaurants, making it difficult to recover and recycle. "We're going to be working with local municipalities and local owner-operators to educate our customers and our restaurant employees on this," DeBiase told me.
The company, said DeBiase, is using the How2Recycle program it joined in 2014 to educate consumers to say, "When you take the packaging out through the Drive-Thru, with the infrastructure that you have available, here's what you can do with the different packaging streams.
"It's challenging, even for me. You want to do the right thing and it's not always easy to understand, based on which municipality you're in, what you can do with the waste."
Like Coke, McDonald’s has success stories to leverage. "In the U.K., about three-quarters of our freestanding restaurants have recycling bins in the restaurant, so the consumers sort their waste packaging," explained DeBiase. "In Germany and Austria, the sorting is done in the back of the house by the crew. So I think the benefit of being McDonald's and being in over 100 countries is we'll continue to learn and evolve our strategies based on what's going to work."
Consumer education is one thing. Another is supporting the local recycling infrastructure. "We're definitely going to have to work closely with local municipalities to create a waste stream that's going to be profitable," said DeBiase. "It's kind of a circle. They're not going to develop streams if there's not something to put in the stream, but people aren't going to make a stream if there's nowhere to recycle it. So how do you break this circle? We think that we have the opportunity to do it, but we can't do it alone."
The second part of both companies’ recent commitments has to do with increasing the use of environmentally responsible packaging:
- Coca-Cola says it plans to make "all of its packaging 100 percent recyclable globally" and to "build better bottles” with increased recycled content, plant-based resins or with less plastic in each container. By 2030, the company aims to make bottles with an average of 50 percent recycled content. "The goal is to set a new global standard for beverage packaging," according to its press release.
- McDonald’s, for its part, committed to produce 100 percent of its "guest packaging" from renewable, recycled or certified sources "with a preference for Forest Stewardship Council certification" by 2025, the company said. Globally, 50 percent of customer packaging currently comes from renewable, recycled or certified sources and 64 percent of fiber-based packaging comes from certified or recycled sources. Last week’s announcement closely followed McDonald’s recent commitment to stop using plastic foam coffee cups at its restaurants by the end of this year.
Both goals are natural follow-ons to Coke and McDonald’s efforts for nearly 30 years to reduce the mass and impacts of their packaging. In 1990, McDonald’s joined forces with the nonprofit group EDF, largely in response to growing pushback on the hamburger giant’s contribution to litter and landfills, to eliminate polystyrene clamshells; convert to unbleached paper carry-out bags, coffee filters and Big Mac wraps; and reduce napkin paper use while increasing postconsumer recycled content.
For Coke and McDonald’s to succeed at their respective initiatives will require a balancing act between the global — setting and achieving goals across their sprawling supply chains and markets — and local — adapting to each country’s and community’s infrastructure, consumer attitudes and cultures.
"When you're dealing with any large community of people you're trying to influence, you're going to have a spectrum," said Jenny McColloch, McDonald’s director, global sustainability. "You're going to have some who are early adopters and take on the charge and are probably already doing a lot of this work already, and trying to think through how can we help them become ambassadors and bring along the ones who are just getting started on their journeys. And when they start feeding off of each other, I think that will be a really good sign that we're making the progress we need."
Added DeBiase: "I'm sure we'll have some ups and downs over the next seven years as we work in each and every local municipality to make this happen. Just keeping up the momentum, the positive spirit, in each and every municipality moving forward — I just think it's going to be really hard."