Is it time to stop using solar-utility war words?

Is it time to stop using solar-utility war words?

war words
ShutterstockBenoit Daoust
Is there too much “war” and conflict language in the media coverage of the solar industry? Or is it natural and necessary?

I recently had an exchange on Twitter about the use of fighting words that we’re seeing in solar headlines and other content, mostly having to do with state net metering battles. Here are a few examples with conflict-related words:

Battles Over Net Metering Cloud the Future of Rooftop Solar

California’s Solar Industry Fights Back On Net Metering 2.0

Sunrun, TASC Fight To Keep Net Metering In Maine

PAC Fronts Formed In Nevada Net Metering Battle

Solar Fighting For Survival In Mass. Energy Transition

Arizona Chamber to Arizona Solar Industry: Drop Dead

Utilities Push Back Against Solar

Nevada PUC’s Rooftop Solar Scrum Continues

Of course, some headlines don’t have any conflict-infused language, but we’ve certainly seen solar and utility spokespeople predicting "death spirals" and "job-killing."

Does war-of-words messaging help Team Solar win legislative battles and capture the hearts and minds of the public, or does it ultimately make us shoot ourselves in the legislative foot?

No studies that I’m aware of say it affects either side of the battlefield, but I do believe this language is natural and most likely will continue for many years.

Before I explain why, let’s be clear: Reporters and editors come up with their own headlines. Solar advocates and utility PR people do not dictate or control this aggressive language. Nevertheless, this conflict-imbued wordplay reflects the passionate tone of our public solar policy disagreements. Given the current state of expiring net metering caps, I don’t expect the tone to change.

Ideally — in tone and action — the solar and distributed energy resources industries want utilities to be "partners" in a smart, distributed grid-tied world, not cast as "enemies" that inflict casualties on solar Davids and utility Goliaths. In fact, a recent article by Julia Pyper on GTM highlighted how at least some utilities want to address consumer preferences for more solar.

So there is opportunity for a truce in the War of Solar-Utility Words, but I don’t think it will hold right now for five main reasons:

1. It’s just too early 

We are in the middle of an energy revolution, and it’s natural to describe that revolution with an emotional context that pushes utility and policy stakeholders to understand that solar, wind and other DER companies are here and changing the world today, regardless whether the utilities and policymakers are prepared for it.

2. There’s a ticking clock 

Desperate times make for desperate words. Many new energy economy investors impatiently wait for returns on their investments, leading to a growing number of solar companies forming policy arms and hiring lobbyists to push legislators and regulators to envision the jobs and tax revenue that a distributed solar world brings. And let’s not forget climate change. The combination of edgy new energy investors and serious climate change concerns puts pressure on solar, storage and grid-edge companies to aggressively make their case on why the 21st-century energy transition must happen sooner rather than later.

3. It’s personal 

Stakeholders on both sides take this clean energy revolution personally. Both see the other side as threatening their jobs, their profits, their growth and especially their customers and their investors. In the context of "fighting" for clean air and the health and welfare of kids and grandkids, clean energy policy decisions truly can be framed as a life-or-death battle.

4. Battle language is simple 

Our clean energy transition is very complicated, but battle language frames the issues simply, and that’s especially important for energizing public opinion. "It’s us against them." "It’s small businesses fighting big business." We see wording such as "job killers" and "protecting ratepayers" as well as "energy independence" and protecting an individual’s "solar rights."

5. Making noise gets attention 

Quite simply, if the DER and solar industries don’t push hard with policymakers, the utilities will have less incentive to compromise or change quickly. We’re in the midst of a clean energy revolution, and revolutions typically involve a great deal of shouting and protest.

Language expresses what people see in the world, and right now we’re seeing many disagreements on how the planet will transition to solar and clean energy. It’s my sincere hope that utilities, solar and DER advocates soon will agree on clear national and local policy paths toward making this historic energy transition a reality. But until then, I expect the War of Solar-Utility Words to continue.