Why the sudden interest in ocean plastic?
The uptick in awareness is unprecedented, and it's not just about feeling sorry for sea creatures.
Over the last year, there has been a surge of interest in the problem of ocean plastic pollution. The media drumbeat began with the now-infamous turtle video, continued through National Geographic’s year-long "Planet or Plastic" series, and hit a new high with the BBC release of "Blue Planet ll."
Recent news shows governments and corporations investing in solutions:
In May, the Australian government set a target for 100-percent reusable, compostable or recyclable packaging by 2025; two months later, the Australian senate recommended a ban on all single-use plastics, including takeout containers, plastic-lined coffee cups, chip packages, and bags — by 2023.
In July, PepsiCo committed $10 million to the "All In On Recycling" initiative to increase recycling rates in the United States and capture 7 billion containers over the next five years.
It’s about time we took this problem seriously.
Charles Moore brought back the first reports of the "plastic garbage patch" in 1997. Since then, we’ve learned that 150 million tons of plastic are in the ocean, much of it from countries taxed with processing exponential levels of plastic with little or no waste management systems. The number has increased by 8 million tons each year as developed countries focus on eliminating single-use plastics such as straws — which represent less than 1 percent of ocean plastic — rather than systemic change.
In 20 years of working on environmental sustainability issues, I’ve never seen a topic or interest exponentially spike like this. Why?
- Animals: From the video of the turtle with the straw stuck in its nose to the beached whale in Thailand with a stomach full of plastic, often people are more motivated by animal welfare than concern for the environment in general.
- Health: We are naturally more concerned about environmental issues that affect our health (known as the "in me, on me, around me" hierarchy in brand management circles): If fish are eating plastic and I eat fish, what does that do to my body? The science is still out, but perception doesn’t wait for science.
- Tangible: Unlike most environmental problems, plastic pollution is tangible and, therefore, relatable. I can’t see greenhouse gases, but I can see plastic on the beach.
- Actionable: I make choices every day about plastic. It’s something I actually can do something about — giving up straws is far easier than installing solar panels on your house.
- Social media: Awareness has been amplified by images and video on social media. When we see video of scuba divers swimming through plastic bags on our Facebook feeds, we take notice.
- Easy target for politicians: Regulators can earn quick wins by passing laws restricting plastic. Banning straws may not solve the plastic pollution problem, but at least it will get passed by the city council.
However, all of this increased attention is not without increased risk. If people feel that they’ve done their part by sharing a Facebook post endorsing a straw ban, will they take similar action in giving up food in convenient (and non-recyclable) multilaminate plastic pouches? If politicians take a stand with single-use plastic regulation, will they also support policies that enable investment in recycling infrastructure?
I’m a lifelong advocate for the causes I believe in. As an idealist fresh out of college, I worked on everything from campaigns to save wild salmon in the Pacific Northwest to efforts to expand afterschool programs to help kids stay on the right track. I saw the incredible power of the private sector to drive change and moved in-house to help Walmart eliminate 20 million metric tons of greenhouse gas from the supply chain. By co-founding Closed Loop Partners, I helped leverage $40 million and unlock $125 million in funds to establish recycling infrastructure across the United States.
Analysis shows that if we can build waste management and recycling systems in Indonesia, China, the Philippines, Vietnam and Thailand, we can reduce leakage by 45 percent. But here’s the catch: The cost of such an effort could be in the billions of dollars.
With governments and corporations committed, we can unlock the funds needed to begin working on that 45 percent. And, when combined with source reduction efforts and closed loop systems at scale, we can take care of the rest.
We’re wasting time like we’re wasting plastic. Let’s stop both.