The new language of sustainability: Risk and resilience

The new language of sustainability: Risk and resilience

Image by Glynnis Jones via

[Editor's note: WRI President Andrew Steer joined GreenBiz Executive Editor Joel Makower at the recent GreenBiz Forum in New York for a conversation about how the concepts of risk and resilience have entered the sustainability discussion. This article builds off that conversation and identifies four lessons for companies that want to address risk and build resilience in their operations.]

Sustainability has become a major business buzzword in recent years, but for many, it's still viewed as a philanthropic initiative, disconnected from a company's core goals, or even a burden that competes with other strategic priorities. That must change.

Fortunately, more leaders are recognizing sustainability risks. At the World Economic Forum in Davos last month, leaders in business, government, academia and civil society named climate change and water supply as two of the top 5 global risks facing companies today  and with good reason.

Extreme weather and climate impacts are becoming increasingly common and carrying a significant economic toll. According to the insurance group Munich Re, the number of weather-related loss events over the past three decades has quintupled in North America, quadrupled in Asia and increased in Africa, Europe and South America. In the United States alone, 11 events crossed the $1 billion mark in losses in 2012. Hurricane Sandy cost U.S. taxpayers more than $60 billion, striking at the heart of a heavily populated business and financial zone. And drought in the U.S. is expected to cost 1 percent of the annual GDP, making it one of the most expensive natural disasters in the country's history.

Likewise, water risks are increasingly on companies' radars. More than 1.2 billion people are already facing water scarcity. By 2025 two-thirds of the world's population will likely experience water stress. According to a 2012 report by the Carbon Disclosure Project, the associated costs of water events for some companies reached $200 million, up 38 percent from the previous year.

So how can companies link these risks to corporate strategy? How can they push the management of sustainability issues into the center of businesses' strategic decision-making?

Here are four takeaways about how companies can act on sustainability by addressing risk and building resilience.

Lesson 1: Identify all your risks

Because future events are likely to become more unpredictable, current risk thresholds are outdated. Businesses cannot entirely plan for the unknown, but the key is to comprehensively identify risk and build resilience into business models. This is the crux of sustainability.

According to GreenBiz's 2013 State of Green Business report, corporate leaders are increasingly watching, measuring and managing environmental and natural resource risks as they become more material and demand urgent attention. The report notes that there is growing interest in integrated reporting that presents both environmental and financial performance data. Investors, then, can see a more accurate balance sheet of the environmental risks for a company's performance.

WRI is working with companies to create the tools to identify and address those environmental risks. Aqueduct, a new, data-rich global water risk mapping platform, is designed to help companies better identify water "hot spots" around the world. We are also creating specific tools for companies that will help them better monitor deforestation rates (to be launched later this year); measure and manage greenhouse gas emissions throughout their entire supply chains; and evaluate ecosystem services' benefits and risks. The quest for consistently better data and information has to continue.

Lesson 2: Translate environmental risks into strategic actions

We need more companies to recognize the economic implications of environmental damage. Some, for example, are putting a monetary value on what nature does for their businesses. It helps them to understand significant costs and benefits that traditional financial analyses can miss. At the Rio+20 conference last year, several major companies, including Coca-Cola, Dow Chemical and Duke Energy, signed onto the Valuing Natural Capital initiative. They agreed to develop a methodology to assign value to the world's forests, freshwater and marine systems.

Addressing both environmental risk and economic interests as an integral part of corporate strategy is the next step. WRI recently updated a familiar business strategy tool to help companies better understand and translate sustainability. We worked with businesses such as Staples, Delphi and Danone Brasil to create a new twist on the traditional "SWOT" analysis. The sustainability SWOT, or "sSWOT", translates environmental challenges  like climate change and resource scarcity  into business risks and opportunities. The sSWOT is helping companies better identify their risks and illustrate new priorities for strategic planning in our changing world.

Lesson 3: Build more resilient markets

We are at a point where investment in resiliency and sustainability is now cost-effective. It is time to stop thinking of regulatory environmental protection as an unnecessary burden that will harm business. Instead, these investments can be seen as enabling private sector innovation and adaptation to global risks.

More public-private collaboration is needed to "de-risk" markets that support sustainability. The last few years have seen some interesting test models, but they now need additional funding and expansion to have a real impact.

Consider, for instance, the Green Climate Fund. It is aimed at helping developing countries  tomorrow's growth markets  to access funds to accelerate a transition to low-carbon energy and prepare for mounting climate change impacts. Similarly, last year's commitment of $175 billion from multilateral development banks could help catalyze sustainable transportation innovations across the world. To reach that scale, however, these markets will need private sector leaders who see these as attractive investment options.

Lesson 4: Don't follow  lead

The riskiest thing a company  even leading companies  can do today is continue to follow business as usual. New risks will require new best practices.

Several companies are now shifting to longer-term analysis of risks and benefits. For example, UPS has relaxed the minimum rate of return it requires that enables the company to invest in a new vehicle fleet that has reduced fuel use and other costs over time. Johnson & Johnson likewise cut its internal rate of return requirements for greenhouse gas-reduction projects by half. And Unilever CEO Paul Polman no longer provides quarterly financial reports to its shareholders, stressing its focus on the long-term.

Meanwhile, some businesses are finding new ways to turn risk into opportunity. For example, Siemens exceeded ambitious revenue targets from its green products in the midst of a global recession. And Alcoa saw its market for green building products grow, even as the broader construction market slumped during the recession. WRI will be profiling some other companies moving toward best practices in its forthcoming working paper, "Aligning Profit and Environmental Sustainability: Stories from Industry," to be released later this week.

Companies who get a handle on environmental risks can talk about sustainability as a means of cutting costs and driving profits. In doing so, they protect their bottom lines  and the planet  for current and future generations. This is how we should be talking about sustainability.

Elliot Metzger, a senior associate at WRI, contributed to this post.

This article is cross-posted at World Resources Institute.

Image by Glynnis Jones via