Displaying 1 - 16 of 16
1
Article
The impact on humanity is no longer a hypothetical concern.
2
Article
We need to limit consumption of foods with outsized climate impacts, especially beef, lamb and goat.
3
Article
Hint: it has to do with methane, a greenhouse gas 84 times as potent as carbon dioxide.
4
Article
European oil giants plan to expand into cleaner products. Their U.S. counterparts: not so much.
5
Article
Insurance giant vows to quadruple green investments, as Dutch bank ING strengthens its policy on coal investments.
6
Article
What started as a research project could slow melting in strategic locations.
by Sue Lebeck
7
Article
Braskem, Galp Energia and Harmony Gold Mining are cutting emissions without science-based targets.
8
Article
Should the oil and gas giant be held responsible for misleading the public?
9
Article
Still, there are many reasons we need to eliminate our carbon dioxide emissions, limit global warming and help society adapt to the future.
10
Article
From tourism to transportation, businesses in the 50th state are rallying behind its commitment to addressing the impacts of climate change. But cultural considerations will dictate the pace of progress.
11
Article
Too many of us are too focused on addressing narrow slices of the challenge, rather than the bigger picture.
by Mark Trexler
12
Article
Instead of waiting for heroes to save us, maybe we can all do some of the work ourselves.
14
Article
There’s more to this questionnaire than checking boxes. Think about these things before digging in.
15
Article
The New York Declaration in September catalyzed political and corporate action, firmly moving deforestation into the mainstream.
by Will Nichols
16
Article
Developing nations need cheap, reliable energy or they will turn to coal. But the solutions to ensure a low-carbon future already exist.